by Ganesh Sahathevan
College of Law CEO Neville Carter has refused to answer any queries, including queries about
his work in Malaysia. The College has been losing crucial PLT market share in Australia.
The highly anticipated Privacy Act Review Report (Report) has been released by the Federal Attorney-General, which sets out significant proposals to amend the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act), including the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). If implemented, these changes will have far-reaching implications for all organisations.
Meanwhile more than a year has passed but College of Law Australia has still not responded to Apple Inc's report of a data breach at the College. As reported the safety of lawyers and law students in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, other ASEAN countries and the UK may be compromised(see below).
The primary Australian regulator is Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman. Speakman remains silent even as Commonwealth Attorney General Mark Dreyfuss proposes enhanced privacy protection.
To Be Read With
Sunday, November 21, 2021
Apple Inc says College of Law Australia is subject of data breach but primary Australian regulator AG NSW Mark Speakman silent-Parochial interests take precedence over safety of lawyers & law students in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, other ASEAN and UK
by Ganesh Sahathevan
Saturday, November 6, 2021
Apple says College of Law Australia is subject of data breach - Personal details of lawyers, law students in Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, other ASEAN and UK may be affected
by Ganesh Sahathevan
The website is owned by College Of Law Ltd, better known as the College Of Law Sydney or College Of Law Australia.
The College has entered into agreements with law societies in Malaysia, Singapore and the Malaysian state of Sabah pursuant to which it has invited lawyers from those jurisdictions to provide their personal details in exchange for access to the College's material.
In 2019 it commenced business in the UK via wholly-owned subsidiary College Of Legal Practise Ltd, offering among other things the UK Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE).
The College has refused to answer queries about its governance and management practises.
END
SEE ALSO
Sunday, July 21, 2019
Malaysia will investigate NSW AG and LPAB oversight of the College Of Law: College's Malaysian business removes protective mantle; likely to further expose LPAB Annual report exclusions
by Ganesh Sahathevan
The story below was published by the well connected Malaysian investigative new site New Malaysia Times. An investigation by all the relevant Malaysian authorities can be expected, and that will involve a forensic examination of the College Of Law Sydney.
Questions about the College's activities in Malaysia have been put by this writer to the two parties ultimately responsible for regulating the College's activities , the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman and the Legal Professional Admission Board NSW.
The queries have been met with accusations, by the LPAB and the AG of harassment , threat and intimidation by this writer of the College's management.They have gone so far as to object to the Attorney General Malaysia being informed about the College's activities in Malaysia
They have also excluded from the LPAB's 2018 and earlier Annual Reports , which the AG tables in the NSW Parliament complaints against the College and its management; and in particular statements on the official record that they have made in support of the College.
All the above is now likely to be investigated in Malaysia.
END
Bar Council education ‘JV’ must be clarified
by Ganesh Sahathevan
The story below was published by the well connected Malaysian investigative new site New Malaysia Times. An investigation by all the relevant Malaysian authorities can be expected, and that will involve a forensic examination of the College Of Law Sydney.
Questions about the College's activities in Malaysia have been put by this writer to the two parties ultimately responsible for regulating the College's activities , the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman and the Legal Professional Admission Board NSW.
The queries have been met with accusations, by the LPAB and the AG of harassment , threat and intimidation by this writer of the College's management.They have gone so far as to object to the Attorney General Malaysia being informed about the College's activities in Malaysia
They have also excluded from the LPAB's 2018 and earlier Annual Reports , which the AG tables in the NSW Parliament complaints against the College and its management; and in particular statements on the official record that they have made in support of the College.
All the above is now likely to be investigated in Malaysia.
END
Bar Council education ‘JV’ must be clarified
KUALA LUMPUR, July 19 – The Malaysian Bar Council launched its first education venture, a LLM in Malaysian Legal Practise (LLM), last year in collaboration with the College Of Law Australia.The LLM does not seem to have the approval of Malaysia’s Legal Professional Qualifying Board (LPQB) but the website for the course, which is hosted in Australia, prominently displays the Bar Council crest.
The crest has not been used before to promote a course of study, and queries put to Bar Council President Fareed Gafoor about the use of the crest have been acknowledged but remain unanswered.NMT has however sighted an email from Fareed dated Friday, May 24, 2019 with regards the LLM and the use of the crest where he states:Dear Rajen,We can’t remain silent on this.Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul GafoorSent from my iPadIt is understood that “Rajen” refers to Rajen Devaraj, Chief Executive Officer of the Bar Council Secretariat in Kuala Lumpur.The Bar has remained silent for nearly 2 months since.







