by Ganesh Sahathevan
The Herald Sun reported on 4 July 2021, under the headline Sydney hotel quarantine leaks don’t coincide with highest COVID numbers:
Leaks in Sydney’s hotel quarantine system have not coincided with higher numbers of positive COVID-19 cases in those hotels, a Sun-Herald analysis has shown, as NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian criticised national cabinet’s decision to cut Australia’s intake of international arrivals in half.
The decision came as the number of overseas acquired cases in NSW reached their lowest levels in recent months, even though the state processes 3000 people through its quarantine system each week. Instances of the Delta variant in returned travellers have also declined.
Professor Greg Dore, an infectious diseases physician and epidemiologist at the Kirby Institute, said the decision to cut NSW’s international arrivals was confusing, given the system was seeing lower positivity rates and lower rates of the Delta variant-“The number of positive cases in hotel quarantine hasn’t increased, and the outbreak in Sydney wasn’t the result of any airborne transmission within a hotel quarantine setting – so it just confuses me as to the logic,” he said.
TO BE READ WITH
Sunday, July 4, 2021
Australian politicians rely on foreign nations to fund their Zero Covid policy-foreign nations ought to start sending them the bill, and deporting stranded Australian citizens & PRs
by Ganesh Sahathevan
While the Federal Court in Newman v The Commonwealth has clearly and unequivocally decided that Australian citizens have no right of return to Australia given the emergency powers granted the Commonwealth pursuant to the provisions of the Biosecurity Act , the Commonwealth does have an obligation to the international community of which it remains a part of, despite the closing of its borders.
Being a hitherto responsible member of that community is what gives meaning to these words found in Australian passports:
The Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, being the representative in Australia of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, requests all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer, an Australian Citizen, to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford him or her every assistance and protection of which he or she may stand in need.
The words to afford him or her every assistance and protection of which he or she may stand in need can only have meaning if the Australian Government honours its legal and moral obligations to its citizens. Not doing so, as is the case in Newman where the assumption that one can return to one's home country has been in the words of counsel for the Commonwealth Craig Lenehan overcome by "legislative bulldozer" means that the burden falls to a foreign nation. In a world of limited resources all nations are expected to care for their own, and cannot be expected to take on the burden of others as well.
Australian state and Commonwealth leaders appear to have disregarded that economic obligation to ensure that a foreign nation is not burdened with the care of Australian citizens. That obligation exists regardless of the legal position in Australia and disregarding it will harm Australia's standing within the international community. It can then be expected that Australian citizens travelling abroad would be expected to post bond to ensure that the countries they visit are not burdened with the care that would normally be assumed by the Australian Government.
The problem becomes obvious when for example Australian citizens are prevented by acts of the Australian Government from returning to Australia when their visas to remain in a foreign country expires. Deportation would be the normal course of action but that becomes virtually impossible when the home country shuts it borders to everyone including its own citizens.
TO BE READ WITH
Reducing arrivals into Australia: Brilliant political strategy by PM ScoMo , and now off to church to pray that foreign countries do not start deporting Australian overstayers; no reason why foreign nations would want to fund ScoMo & premiers' chances of re-election
No comments: