Monday, September 9, 2019

Law Council Australia can help remove Minshen Zhu''s cover that adds to his capacity to defy Australian security: That would be better than Arthur Moses SC lecturing HK lawyers to stand-up to China

by Ganesh Sahathevan


A few other Australians can be spotted in footage of the event, which was attended by Xi Jinping and Politburo Standing Committee Member Wang Yang. Here is Zhu Minshen, who famously paid Sam Dastyari's travel bill, shaking hands with Papa Xi 4/


Image
3:59 PM · May 31, 2019·@alexjoske
China-HK protest on Australian campuses but not at Minshen Zhu controlled campuses-Are legal profession admission rules being used (again ) to suppress complaints and protests


It has been reported on this blog that the Attorney General of NSW Mark Speakman SC and senior judicial officers at the Legal Profession Admission Board NSW  ignored the fact that Zhu Minshen undermined an Australian Federal Police directive.

As reported,  he did so when  he organised  students , including students from his Top Education Institute to counter  Tibetan  protesters  at the  2008 Olympic Torch rally in Canberra.
Despite that clear undermining of Australian law and order Zhu was granted, with Law Society Of Australia approval, the "first and only" license granted a private company that is not a university.
With that license comes the right to effectively veto an application by any graduate of his law school to seek admission to be admitted to practice law in NSW and Australia. This right gives him enormous power over his students to ensure that their views of the Chinese Government do not differ from his own.It also helps justify his defiance if not brush over his open defiance of  Australian security agencies and police.


Meanwhile, the Law Society Australia's president Arthur Moses SC has taken it upon himself to lecture Hong Kong's lawyers on their responsibility to uphold the law.
Clearly, Moses and the LSA would better serve their HK counterparts by removing the cover they and the Australian legal establishment provide Misnhen Zhu.
The above adds to the story below, published on September 1 2019, where it has been shown that the approvals Moses, his LSA and the legal establishment granted Zhu are being used to partially fund Zhu's business with a facial recognition company linked to the Chinese Government. 

END 


SEE ALSO


Sunday, September 1, 2019


Law Soc Australia cannot lecture Chinese lawyers while it provides cover to CPC linked Minshen Zhu

by Ganesh Sahathevan




A few other Australians can be spotted in footage of the event, which was attended by Xi Jinping and Politburo Standing Committee Member Wang Yang. Here is Zhu Minshen, who famously paid Sam Dastyari's travel bill, shaking hands with Papa Xi 4/



Image



The AFR reported on 8 August 2019:
The president of Australia’s peak legal body has told leaders of the profession in China that there is no rule of law in their country and they need to speak up and challenge the government.

“I was direct with my colleagues in the legal profession in China,” Mr Moses told The Australian Financial Review.

“I told them that you cannot use rhetoric to claim there is the rule of law in China when you don’t have an independent judiciary, detainees are denied access to lawyers and lawyers are imprisoned for seemingly doing their job by representing persons who may have a contrary view to the government.

“That is not the rule of law. That is rule by law.”
(see Law Council boss ticks off China lawyers)y


Meanwhile Mr Moses' Law Society Australia , the NSW Law Society and Legal Professional Admission Board, which is under the purview of Mr Moses' fellow senior counsel, Mr Mark Speakman SC,have provided the Communist Party Of China (CPC) linked Minshen Zhu the credibility and standing of an Australian law school chancellor , and with it the funding and cover to help further develop the CPC's surveillance infrastructure:




END 

See alos
NSW AG attempted to evade information and queries on political donor Minshen Zhu: AG has a duty to ensure that Zhu is registered as a foreign agent, but instead grants Zhu rights,privileges, never before (and since) granted a private entity


No comments:

Post a Comment