Sunday, October 11, 2020

Premier-in-waiting Mark Speakman is the minister ultimately responsible for the matter of Zhu Minshen, and the cover-up

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


                                                     
                                                         Mark Speakman AG is considered
                                                        a replacement for Gladys Berejiklian                                


With regards the cover-up:




And now, read on: 



Saturday, December 21, 2019

Zhu Minshen's law school approvals involved the highest levels of the NSW Supreme Court administration: Chief Justice Bathurst and AG Speakman ultimately responsible for approvals & renewals which were granted despite Dastiyari scandal, Zhu's defiance of AFP directives

by Ganesh Sahathevan



NSW LPAB Chairman Bathurst who granted Top Group its history making right to issue LLB degrees will stay in job till 2023: Bathurst CJ will be around to swear in Top Group law grads as officers of His Honour's Court.

The New South Wales Legal Profession Admission Board, which provided Zhu Minshen's HK listed Top Education Group Ltd its approval and later renewal of its  license to issue law degrees in Australia seems to have had an interesting year. 

In less than a year after it appointed an outsider as Executive Officer, it advertised the position as if vacant, apparently seeking a replacement.It is unclear if Ms Tan Siew Ting Mckeogh was being replaced, or whether the advertisement was simply the usual NSW Public Service method of re-advertising a position that has already been filled.
Ms Tan McKeogh signed-off the LPAB's 2018-2019 Annual Report as Acting Executive Officer.


Confirmation is not possible given the LPAB's refusal to answer any questions about its work; it has been evasive on a number of matters, including its failure to report complaints against it and the College Of Law Sydney, which it regulates, in the relevant 2017-2018 Annual Report. This evasiveness has extended to the practise of issuing letters unsigned, and simply marking them "on behalf of the Board" if at all.


Nevertheless, the advertisement has provided some insight into the Executive Officer's functions and powers.It is clear from the position description that the Executive Officer could not but have had a significant part to play in the approval and later review and renewal of Zhu Minshen and Top Group's license to issue LLBs.


The advertisement also provides insight into who the Executive Officer's superiors are. While the Executive Officer wields considerable power within the LPAB, the LPAB itself is chaired by the Chief Justice Of NSW, Thomas Bathurst.
In addition the advertisement states that the Executive Officer also reports to the  Executive Director, Superior Courts.Chris D'Aeth. D'Aeth has been Executive Director and Principal Registrar of the Supreme Court NSW since 2015.He would therefore have overseen Top Group's initial application, and more recent review which "went smoothly" despite the issues surrounding the matter(see story below). As reported, this included an account from Professor Clive Hamilton of how Zhu organised student demonstrationsin Canberra in defiance of AFP directives.

The Chief Justice and the minister in charge, the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman have continued to remain silent on all of the above despite extensive reporting on Top Group and Zhu Minshe's dealings (see also New Matilda story below).


END 







Friday, September 27, 2019


Zhu Minshen announces that NSW LPAB review "went smoothly": AG NSW Mark Speakman and officers unconcerned by Clive Hamilton's disclosures of threats, intimidation and defiance of AFP directives ,share price collapse

by Ganesh Sahathevan



The LPAB''s tick of approval does not seem to have reversed the downward trend in share price.Indeed it does look as if the LPAB has ignored all together the fact that Top's market capitalisation has collapsed since listing. Note that Top's shareprice has fallen 14.29% over the past month,compared to 1.13% for the overall market as measured by the Hang Seng Index

In the words of Zhu Minshen, chairman and CEO of his Top Education Group Ltd:



Bachelor of Law Re-accreditation 

The scheduled re-accreditation process of our Bachelor of Laws (‘‘LLB’’) went smoothly. On 27 June 2019, TOP received formal notification from the Legal Profession Admission Board of New South Wales (‘‘LPAB’’) to accredit TOP’s LLB for a further five-year period commencing from the notification date.
(TOP EDUCATION GROUP LTD
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANNUAL RESULTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019)




All this despite the revelations of open defiance of an AFP directive, threats and intimidation disclosed in Clive Hamilton's "Silent Invasion",which have been previously reported on this blog:

In his 2018 book "Silent Invasion" Professor Clive Hamilton reports that Top Education Group's Zhu Minshen organised  students , including students from his Top Education Institute to protest  against Tibetans at the  2008 rally , which counted towards the Top students’ assessment.  Zhu’s Top Institution is “perhaps the only accredited degree program in Australia that counts agitating for a foreign power towards its qualifications.”


Hamilton provides details of Zhu's Communist Party China antecedents and his organisation of the 30,000 strong demonstration by Chinese students at the Canberra torch relay, many of them brandishing Chinese flags.

This was clearly an open challenge to the authority , and in public defiance  of, the AFP's directive to Chinese government security that they were not to be involved in the torch relay. As Hamilton puts is "ASIO shat themselves".

Despite this open defiance of the law that they are meant to defend and uphold the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman and the other senior judicial officers at the LPAB determined that an exception should  be made to allow Zhu to operate the "first and only" law school in Australia that is not part of a university.


END 

See Also 



Law Council Australia 's exception for Zhu Minshen despite Law Council declaring China's justice system "a joke"


















Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pictured with Top Education's Minshen Zhu.

A Top Education? Dastyari’s Donations Troubles Expose The College With Impeccable Connections

By  on September 2, 2016Education
A top education? Sam Dastyari’s donations trouble exposes the private college with impeccable connections.
Labor Senator Sam Dastyari has found himself under considerable scrutiny this week over a donation he received from Sydney’s Top Education Institute.
There is no doubt that Sam Dastyari is close to the Top Education Institute – otherwise he could scarcely have called on them to pay his parliamentary travel bill when he exceeded its cap. Close scrutiny has now also revealed that his disclosures on interstate travel have been sloppy, to say the least.
But Dastyari is not the only one to have links to Top Education. The private college is well-known in the corridors of power. Top Education’s director Minshen Zhu is one of the best-connected foreign donors in the country.










Labor Senator Sam Dastyari.Labor Senator Sam Dastyari.
The Top Education Institute is headquartered in the Biotechnology Building of inner Sydney’s Australian Technology Park. It was the first Australian college to be on the Chinese government’s approved list of tertiary institutions. Top Education has achieved the prestigious TEQSA certification to offer Bachelors’ degrees. It is the only non-university institute to offer Australian-accredited law degrees at undergraduate level. This course was originally only approved with conditions in 2013, but was fully accredited without conditions in 2015.
Top Education’s chairperson Minshen Zhu is reported to have close links with the Chinese government, though exactly how close is difficult to ascertain. An ANU graduate, Dr Zhu was a board member of the Confucius Institute of the University of Sydney. He has been a delegate to the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, a consultative body that implies political influence. In 2012, former foreign minister Bob Carr also appointed him to a Chinese Ministerial Consultative Committee.
Criticism of Dastyari, particularly from Liberal Party senators such as Cory Bernardi and George Brandis, has focussed on Top Education’s links with the Chinese government. This is ironic. The public record shows that the Liberal Party also seems to enjoy close connections with Dr Zhu and the Top Education Institute.
Dr Zhu has been remarkably adept at convincing Australian politicians to help promote and market his institution. Indeed his college has received extraordinary attention from the most senior members of the LNP government.










Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, pictured with Minshen Zhu.Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, pictured with Minshen Zhu.
As prime ministers, both Malcolm Turnbull and before him Tony Abbott found time to attend Top Education functions. Fairfax yesterday reported that he also met with Attorney-General George Brandis in April this year, and with Treasurer Scott Morrison in November 2015.
The payment of Senator Dastyari’s travel bill has caused him considerable embarrassment. But Dastyari’s $1,670 travel invoice is just a small indication of Top Education’s political largesse. Top Education has donated handsomely to both major parties in recent years. While Top Education initially favoured the ALP in donations, since the Liberal Party came to power in 2013, Top Education’s donations have shifted to the federal and New South Wales branches of the Liberals.
Australian Electoral Commission registries indicate that the Australian Labor Party has received at least $186,000 from Top Education since 2010. Between 2014 and 2015, Top Education has donated $44,275 to the Liberal national and New South Wales branches. Unusually, the Top Education Institute itself did not disclose any of its donations to the ALP to the AEC. They were disclosed by the ALP.
Dr Zhu and Top Education have also built plenty of face-to-face connections with top Liberal politicians. He is well-known in the party rooms of Parliament. Simple internet searches can easily find photos of Top Education’s supremo with Malcolm Turnbull, George Brandis and Julia Gillard.
There is also video footage and Facebook photos of Alex Hawke (now the Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Security) speaking at the Top Education Institute on July 27 2015. Hawke was there on behalf of Tony Abbott and Christopher Pyne, then the education minister. He even read out a special message from the Prime Minister. Such favours have been frugally bestowed on Australian public universities, who were at that stage engaged in fractious negotiations with Pyne over the govenrment’s policy of university fee deregulation. 
Abbott and Pyne were already well-acquainted with the Top Education Institute. They met with the Institute’s senior management in September 2013, just a fortnight after the Abbott government was elected. On Top Education’s website, you can see a photo with Abbott prominently featured. He is pictured holding a brochure for the Institute’s new law school. The close relationship with the government has endured after Abbott’s demise as prime minister. On November 7 2015, Turnbull was photographed holding a course brochure at a dinner with Dr Zhu.
Yesterday, Attorney General George Brandis was keen to distinguish the payment of personal debt from political donations. “Indeed, many of us have met Mr Minshen Zhu and had dealings with the Top Education Institute but it appears only Senator Sam Dastyari has accepted money from him in settlement of a personal debt,” he told the Senate. Ordinary voters may question this distinction.

Dr Zhu’s big donations at ALP functions

The ALP has been Top Education’s most favoured donation recipient, with at least $186,000 donated to state and federal branches of the Labor Party since 2010. New Matilda attempted to contact ALP Federal Secretary George Wright about the ALP donations but ALP head office said that he was away and not available for comment. New Matilda understands that multiple donations from Top Education Institute are classified as ‘other receipts’ because they were paid at functions and events, rather than as financial gifts without any benefit in return.
The practice throws a spotlight on the increasing popularity of these ‘other receipts” as a category for donations disclosures. As Crikey’s Bernard Keane argued yesterday, “‘Other receipt’ is especially useful because any payment of any kind other than a donation — such as a tax refund, bank interest or a legitimate asset sale — gets lumped into that category, further reducing the clarity of disclosure.”

A donations spree in a time of higher education deregulation

The policy context for Top Education’s donations spree is instructive. Under a policy begun by the Gillard government and continued under the Coalition governments of Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull, tertiary education in Australia has been opened up to the private sector in unprecedented ways.
As a result of these reforms, private education providers such as vocational colleges and institutes are now able to access federal government funding via the FEE-HELP system. This system plays a crucial role in Australian higher education, enabling students to study for expensive tertiary qualifications without paying anything upfront, by taking a loan out through the federal government. Without access to FEE-HELP, private colleges would find it much more difficult to sign up large numbers of domestic students. 
Students at the Top Education Institute can access FEE-HELP.
As New Matilda has chronicled, the expansion of FEE-HELP to private colleges in the vocational sector has been a billion-dollar disaster for Australian education. Notorious swindlers like the Phoenix Institute and former stock market high-flyers Vocation moved into the sector, vacuumed up hundreds of millions of dollars in government education loans, and then collapsed.
The Top Education Institute is not without its own scandals. In May this year it was reported that TEI was offering internships at prestigious accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers. For a cool $2,800, prospective interns could “work closely with PwC partners”, according to an advertisement on social network WeChat. In response, PwC and Top Education then scrambled to explain the advertisement as a misunderstanding; apparently the positions were in fact only a two week ‘development’ course fee.
The arrangement between Top Education and PwC got murkier. In June this year PwC Australia acquired a 15 per cent stake in TOP Education. PwC and Top openly spruiked its investment in Top Education as an opportunity to get involved in the lucrative export education trade.
According to this article on Top Education’s website:
TOP Education’s Chair of Council and former Vice-Chancellor of La Trobe University, Emeritus Professor Brian Stoddart, said that TOP was delighted to align with PwC.
“PwC recognises the value of investment in education export services and of the services already provided by TOP as a leading private innovator in the sector,” he said.
New Matilda is not suggesting Dr Zhu or Top Education have done anything improper. However the generous donations on the public record highlight the assiduous efforts Dr Zhu has made to court major party politicians. 
Examining Top Education’s lobbying efforts suggests that the real play here is probably not Chinese soft power or political influence. In fact, the real value of Top Education’s generosity may be about securing a foothold position in Australia’s increasingly-privatised higher education market. The advantages for a private college looking to cash in on a boom in overseas students looking to study at private universities are manifest.


Friday, October 9, 2020

The Zhenhua method, not database ,is the real danger: AG NSW Mark Speakman & officers' decision to grant Zhu Minshen & Top Group a license to issue law degrees illustrates why the method matters more than inclusion in the database

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

Troy Grant MP

Mark Speakman

 

The Zhenhua database has concerned many, especially those whose names have been reported to be on the list. However, the main concern ought to be with the methods used by Zhenua and other Chinese government linked organisation to collect and analyse open source data.

Put in another way, the machinery that exists can be tasked at anytime and within seconds to collect data on anyone.

As demonstrated in the paragraphs that follow, simple Internet searches of Communist Party China linked businessman and educationist Zhu Minshen  and his Top Group can uncover information on a wide range of influential persons.; in this case the Attorney General Of NSW Mark Speakman, and his officers, especially those at the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board. Speakman and the others named below are not known by this writer  to be on the Zhenhua database.


The NSW Legal Profession Admission Board (LPAB) is a statutory body chaired by the Chief Justice of New South Wales Tom Bathurst. It is part of the NSW Department Of Justice and the Minister responsible is the Attorney General NSW , currently Mark Speakman SC


The LPAB's duties include granting licenses for the award of Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degrees. Until recently only public universities were issued these licenses. In 2015 the LPAB issued a license to grant LLBs to TOP Education Group Ltd, which proudly proclaims the fact that it is the "first and only" private company to have been granted such a license.

The LPAB states in its 2015 Annual Report:

In addition, the LPAB received an application for accreditation of a new law degree to be offered by a non-university provider, TOP Education Institute (LLB).
The LPAB considered the advice of its Accreditation Sub-Committee and Legal Qualifications Committee, and also consulted with other admitting authorities through the Law Admissions Consultative Committee (LACC), before deciding to accredit the new degree with effect from 1 January 2015.
http://www.lpab.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Annual%20Report%202014-15.
Dr Gordon Elkington, a member of the NSW LPAB Board, was assigned to TEQSA to assist with the TOP application for the relevant licenses from TEQSA. 

In 2018 Zhu listed his Top Group on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. 
Zhu's business failures are listed on page 160 and 167 of the IPO Prospectus. They are failures in small businesses which in turn raise questions about his capacity to fund a much larger venture like TOP. Regardless, the prospectus shows how Zhu relied on his LPAB accreditation to promote his IPO. 

In the 4 months or so prior to the LPAB granting TOP the license to issue law degrees, TOP made donations worth AUD 44 275 to the Liberal Party NSW Branch.









TO BE READ WITH 



Sunday, August 9, 2020

Zhu Minshen Top Group law school froze enrolments in 2019 after NSW LPAB reaccreditation: NSW LPAB & its Chairman , the Chief Justice NSW Tom Bathurst, have provided no explanation

by Ganesh Sahathevan


                          Ambassador Cheng Jingye Pays an Official Visit to the State of New 
                          South Wales   (2016/08/16)

The following statement appears at the bottom of Zhu Minhen's Top Education law school website:


* Law school is currently not accepting any new enrolments for its Bachelor of Laws course


The Acting Dean of the law school,  Katherine Lindsay , has confirmed in writing :

No new law students have been admitted  in 2020.

The decision to freeze enrolments appears to have been made after the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board reaccredited Top's license to issue law degrees on 27 June 2019. 

The NSW LPAB and its Chairman, the Chief Justice NSW Tom Bathurst, have provided no public explanation and have maintained their usual silence

Top is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange but the HKEX has not been informed of this freezing of law school enrolments, despite Top relying on its "one and only" and "very unique" law school to sell its IPO.

TO BE READ WITH 



Friday, September 27, 2019

Zhu Minshen announces that NSW LPAB review "went smoothly": AG NSW Mark Speakman and officers unconcerned by Clive Hamilton's disclosures of threats, intimidation and defiance of AFP directives ,share price collapse

by Ganesh Sahathevan



The LPAB''s tick of approval does not seem to have reversed the downward trend in share price.Indeed it does look as if the LPAB has ignored all together the fact that Top's market capitalisation has collapsed since listing. Note that Top's shareprice has fallen 14.29% over the past month,compared to 1.13% for the overall market as measured by the Hang Seng Index

In the words of Zhu Minshen, chairman and CEO of his Top Education Group Ltd:



Bachelor of Law Re-accreditation 

The scheduled re-accreditation process of our Bachelor of Laws (‘‘LLB’’) went smoothly. On 27 June 2019, TOP received formal notification from the Legal Profession Admission Board of New South Wales (‘‘LPAB’’) to accredit TOP’s LLB for a further five-year period commencing from the notification date.
(TOP EDUCATION GROUP LTD
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANNUAL RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019)




All this despite the revelations of open defiance of an AFP directive, threats and intimidation disclosed in Clive Hamilton's "Silent Invasion",which have been previously reported on this blog:

In his 2018 book "Silent Invasion" Professor Clive Hamilton reports that Top Education Group's Zhu Minshen organised  students , including students from his Top Education Institute to protest  against Tibetans at the  2008 rally , which counted towards the Top students’ assessment.  Zhu’s Top Institution is “perhaps the only accredited degree program in Australia that counts agitating for a foreign power towards its qualifications.”


Hamilton provides details of Zhu's Communist Party China antecedents and his organisation of the 30,000 strong demonstration by Chinese students at the Canberra torch relay, many of them brandishing Chinese flags.

This was clearly an open challenge to the authority , and in public defiance  of, the AFP's directive to Chinese government security that they were not to be involved in the torch relay. As Hamilton puts is "ASIO shat themselves".

Despite this open defiance of the law that they are meant to defend and uphold the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman and the other senior judicial officers at the LPAB determined that an exception should  be made to allow Zhu to operate the "first and only" law school in Australia that is not part of a university.


END 

See Also 



Law Council Australia 's exception for Zhu Minshen despite Law Council declaring China's justice system "a joke"









Thursday, October 8, 2020

"Shariff resettled his family in (Melbourne) Australia in 2002 and continued to pursue radical ideology": Graham Ashton, Vic Police & ors allowed jihadi Zulfikar Shariff and associates to operate publicly for more than a decade

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


ChannelNewsAsia reported: 

(Zulfikar) Shariff was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in July 2016 for terrorism-related activities, the Ministry of Home Affairs said then.

He influenced others with radical messages and material he propagated online, including “numerous Facebook postings glorifying and promoting Isis and their violent actions, while exploiting religion to legitimise the terrorist activities of ISIS”.


He had embarked on the path of radicalism as early as 2001 after reading jihadi-related material, said MHA, supporting terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and the Jemaah Islamiyah, and advocating Muslims to take up arms in Afghanistan after the Sep 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the US.

According to MHA, Shariff resettled his family in Australia in 2002 and continued to pursue radical ideology.


Answers are needed from all concerned as to why Zulfikar was allowed to operate without any trouble from Victoria Police, various police chiefs including Graham Ashton, and all other agencies charged with keeping us safe.


TO BE READ WITH 

 

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Zulfikar Shariff(2nd from right) and sons

 


Victorian Police Commissioner Graham Ashton was provided information on the ongoing jihadi activities of one Zulfikar Shariff of Melbourne, but he did nothing. Ashton refused to act even after Shariff began posting on hiss Facebook, articles such as this, which even a Muslim found "frightening":

Zulfikar Shariff

December 22, 2013 via mobile

Walking along Craigieburn Rd and saw little green birds flying.
Wonder if I will ever be in the little green birds flying freely in Paradise.
And my Rabb asks me if I need anything.
Insha Allah. Amin




Then there were postings of this type:
Zulfikar Shariff

December 14, 2013 via mobile
Looking at the snow and ice covering the Middle East, I am reminded of this hadith:
On the authority of Thawbaan (May Allah be pleased with him), the Messenger of Allah said:

"If you see the Black Banners coming from Khurasan go to them immediately, even if you must crawl over ice, because indeed amongst them is the Caliph, Al Mahdi."


Zulfikar Shariff
January 12 via mobile

Yes Ariel Sharon is dead. But Israel and its murderous, brutal leaders is still there. So what are we doing about it?


Finally, it was action by the Government Of Singapore that saved  Melbourne and Australia (see article below)
END





Did ST play a role in the apprehension of alleged extremist Zulfikar Shariff?



In December last year, this publication reported about a Singaporean who supported the setting-up of ISIS like Caliphate in the region. The Singaporean, Zulfikar Shariff, who is a PhD student in La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia, was reported to be openly supporting an ISIS-inspired Caliphate to immediately replace the western-ideology imposed secular States in our region (http://theindependent.sg/australias-fears-not-unfounded-singaporean-supports-set-up-of-isis-like-caliphate-in-region).
12The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said today (29 Jul) that it had arrested and detained Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff, 44, after it determined that he had used social media to propagate and spread his radical messages. He considered his propagation of radical material as a form of jihad, by way of creating awareness of ISIS and promoting armed jihad.
MHA’s press release on Zulfikar’s detention can be read here: http://bit.ly/2aCqjuN, and it said (in part):
Zulfikar admitted that besides his intention to promote ISIS and armed jihad, he also wanted his online followers to reject the Western secular democratic nation-state system and instead establish an Islamic caliphate in its place, governed by Syariah law. He believes that violence should be used to achieve this goal if necessary. To this end, Zulfikar had actively looked into holding training programmes aimed at radicalising young Singaporeans so that they would be persuaded into joining his extremist agenda.”
Zulfikar resettled his family in Australia in 2002 after MHA started investigating a Muslim organisation, Fateha, which he headed. Commenting on why he left Singapore in 2002, Zulfikar said:
“A few weeks after the General Elections, the PAP government arrested 18 individuals under the Internal Security Act, allegedly for being members of a militant group known as Jemaah Islamiah. It seemed then, that the ‘Ho Ching Miracle’ criminal defamation report was a reflection of a plan for my arrest. I realised that if it was known that I was trying to leave Singapore, the ISD may arrest me before it happened. To mask the intention, I acted as though I intended to remain in Singapore. Only close family and Fateha members,including the families involved in the tudung case were informed. It was decided then, that I would leave for Australia. My application for an Australian visa was submitted only after I left Singapore.”
While online news sites like The Independent Singapore avoided publishing Zulfikar’s comments in his personal Facebook, as well as from his posts in his Facebook page ‘Al-Makhazin Singapore’, The Straits Times (ST) published an op-ed by him on 28 May this year – mere days before he was arrested and detained.
In the op-ed titled, ‘Duterte: Beneath tough talk, is he a potential peacemaker?‘, Zulfikar suggested that the President of Philippines, Duterte’s tough, warrior-like image was just a front and that because of his support for Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao in Philippines, he was actually a peacemaker.
Some netizens have speculated that Zulfikar could have been lulled into a false sense of security about re-entering Singapore after the Government mouthpiece, ST, published his work.
Home Affairs Minister, Mr K Shanmugam, commenting on Zulfikar’s arrest said: “We had to be quite sure about the evidence against Zulfikar, so we were looking at him over a period of time. Second, he was overseas. Recently he came into Singapore, and when we felt that we had enough evidence, and he came, we took him into custody.”

Besides Zulfikar Shariff the following decisions were made by MHA’s Internal Security Department:
  1. Mohamed Saiddhin bin Abdullah (Saiddhin; Singaporean; aged 33), a radicalised businessman, was issued with a Restriction Order (RO)[2] for a period of two years in Jul 2016.
  2. Muhammad Fadil bin Abdul Hamid (Fadil; Singaporean; aged 27), was re-detained under the ISA for a period of two years in Apr 2016 as he intended to join a terrorist group like ISIS, to engage in armed violence in Syria.
  3. A 17-year-old male Singaporean, who recently graduated from a madrasah, was issued with an RO for a period of two years under the ISA in Jul 2016. Investigations showed that he had become radicalised online after viewing pro-ISIS videos, websites and social media material.
  4. Self-radicalised Singaporean Abdul Basheer s/o Abdul Kader (Basheer; aged 37), was released on Suspension Direction[3] (SD) in Feb 2016.
  5. The RO of Singaporean Rijal Yadri bin Jumari (Rijal; aged 35), was allowed to lapse upon expiry in Mar 2016.