Friday, June 14, 2024

Class action against Dell for data breach affecting 49 Million customers, but Australia's ACCC says it has no jurisdiction to address complaints from Dell users in Australia who have suffered software and hardware damage caused by breach

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



While Dell faces a class action for the data breach that affected 49 Million customers worldwide, in Australia the Australian Competition And Consumer Commission (ACCC) has declared in writing to this writer ,and DELL laptop owner, that it has no jurisdiction to address complaints from Dell users in Australia who have suffered  software and hardware damage caused by breach (which this user has).


This comes as a surprise for the ACCC has, under the leadership of Rod Sims, promptly attended to consumer  complaints against DELL.The new chair  Gina Cass-Gottliebhas has  not explained why she feels her powers have been curtailed. 


TO BE READ WITH 




Dell Sued After Data Belonging to 49 Million Customers For Sale On Dark Web Featured

Dell sends email notifications to customers after hacker found selling access to stolen data containing details on 49 million users.

A class action lawsuit was recently filed against computer giant, Dell Computers, after it was learned that information belonging to 49 million customers is being sold on the Dark Web. The lawsuit accuses Dell of “negligence” after a cyberattack was able to breach the Company’s database.

Over a two day period beginning May 9, 2024 – Dell customers received an email from the company where it revealed that its database had been breached. According to the email, names, physical addresses and hardware and order information- such as service tags, item descriptions, date of order and warranty information- was exposed in the breach.

The language of the lawsuit accuses Dell of “negligence” and says the plaintiff and other class action members “now suffer from a present and continuing risk of fraud and identity theft and must now constantly monitor their financial accounts.”

What Happened?

Little is known to date about the data breach. According to a Company statement, an “incident” involving a “Dell portal” had led to a database containing “limited types of customer information including name, physical address, and certain Dell hardware and order information” being exposed.

The computing firm said it “did not include financial or payment information, email address, telephone number or any highly sensitive customer data”, adding that it did not believe there was a “significant risk” to customers given the nature of the information involved – Dell said it was taking proactive steps to notify them.

“Dell Technologies has a cybersecurity program designed to limit risk to our environments, including those used by our customers and partners,” the US firm’s statement said.

What Is Dell Doing to Protect My Identity?

Dell’s statement goes on to say that upon discovering this incident, it promptly implemented its incident response procedures, applied containment measures, began investigating, and notified law enforcement. The investigation is supported by external forensic specialists.

“We continue to monitor the situation and take steps to protect our customers’ information. Although we don’t believe there is significant risk to our customers given the type of information involved, we are taking proactive steps to notify them as appropriate.”

Dell is not currently offering credit monitoring or identity theft protection services to affected individuals. The PC maker warned customers to watch out for strange activity on their Dell accounts and potential tech support scams.

What Can Hackers Do With My Information?

Stephen Crow, security director at cybersecurity firm ANS, said recent Dell customers should be alert to any suspicious messages they receive claiming to be Dell or another firm.

““An immediate priority for impacted Dell customers will be to be wary of communications around recent orders, as these could be fraudulent,” he said.

“Malicious actors may seek to gain more data through targeted attacks using the information stolen.

He added: “The data breach at Dell is a stark reminder that no organization is completely immune from cyber threats, and that all forms of customer data requires stringent protection.

“Despite the absence of financial data, threat actors could potentially use the stolen information to launch phishing or malware attacks against consumers. They are likely to sell this data on the dark web as well, putting customers at even more risk.

Protect Your Identity. Join the Dell Data Breach Class Action.

If you receive a notification letter from Dell Computers, you are at permanent risk of identity theft and the devastating financial and legal consequences that go along with it.

You may be eligible to participate in a class action lawsuit to recover compensation for loss of privacy, time spent dealing with the breach, out-of-pocket costs, and more.

The lawsuit looks to cover anyone in the USA whose private information was compromised by the breach announced by Dell Computers.

Please complete the below form shown on this page and a data breach attorney will contact you. There is no cost to you.


Join the Dell data breach class action. There is no cost to you.

Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Bar Council Malaysia working with College Of Law Australia promised its members "internationally recognised" law qualifications - College Of Law Sydney not among law schools certified by the Australian Law Schools Standards Committee

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

 An extract from the Bar Council Malaysia's 2017/18 Annual Report: 







However,  College Of Law Australia, based in  Sydney,is not among law schools certified by the Australian Law Schools Standards Committee. The College's CEO Neville Carter has ordered his staff to not entertain queries from this writer, which go back to 2018, and concern the College's conduct in Malaysia.


TO BE READ WITH 









Saturday, January 23, 2021

College Of Law Sydney's LLM degrees offered in Malaysia, Singapore, ASEAN not recognised even in Australia: College Of Law Sydney not among law schools certified by the Australian Law Schools Standards Committee

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 




                                                            https://www.collaw.com/our-people



Readers will recall that Sydney's College Of Law has begun offering a range of LLMs, or Masters Of Law courses in Malaysia, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN on the strength of its standing in Australia, and its contribution to legal practise in Malaysia going back to the 80s. As New Malaysia Times has reported, the College's past and recent business in Malaysia is shrouded in mystery. Silence on the part of the College's advisers in Malaysia, Dinesh Bashkaran of Shearn & Wong Tat Chung of Wong Beng Toh, who are senior members of the Malaysian Bar , has only deepened the mystery. 


Now it has been discovered that the College Of Law Sydney, and thus the LLM courses it offers,are not certified by even the Council Of Australian Law Deans and its   Australian Law Schools Standards Committee.


The Australian Law Schools Standards Committee (ALSSC) is established under Standard 12 of the Australian Law School Standards. The ALSSC’s functions are to:

  • consider and determine applications from law schools for certification as compliant with the Standards; and
  •  keep the Standards under review and to propose to CALD amendments from time to time.

The ALSSC is comprised of eight committee members from both within and outside the law school sector.

A list of the Australian Law Schools that are certified as at 9 March 2020 is available here.

https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Certified-Law-Schools-as-at-9-Mar-2020.pdf               

Readers can see for themselves from the PDF link above that the College Of Law Sydney is not among those listed as being certified by the CALD.

END 

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

Anwar Ibrahim has threatened to block the promotions of civil service bosses who turn a blind eye to corruption - A timely reminder that corrupt practices at the Industrial Court Malaysia in favour of Vincent Tan Chee Yioun remains uninvestigated.

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Malaysiakini Morning Briefing for 12 June 2024 starts with this:


PM warns civil service bosses

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has threatened to block the promotions of civil service bosses who turn a blind eye to corruption within their departments or units.

He said rampant corruption couldn't persist for years within the civil service without top officials being aware of it.

He said the fight against corruption must be a collective responsibility, and not just a matter to leave to the authorities.


Anwar's warning serves as a reminder of the likely courrpt practises at the Industrial Court Malaysia in favour of Vincent Tan Chee Yioun, which remains uninvestigated.



TO BE READ WITH 


Sunday, December 10, 2023

Sultan Ibrahim has declared that he is going to "hunt all the corrupt people"- The corruption of the Industrial Court system in a matter involving Johoreans Rejal Arbee and Vincent Tan Chee Yioun, and Singapore billionaire Peter Lim who has investments in Johor, will be a easy place to start

 by Ganesh Sahathevan



Malaysia's incoming King Sultan Ibrahim has declared :

'I'm going to hunt all the corrupt people' 


This  Industrial Court matter which involves his critic and Johor subject  Rejal Arbee, his former employer  and  Johor subject Vincent Tan, and the Singapore billionaire Peter Lim (who has business in Johor) would be a good place to start. Even the judge in the matter was a Johorean, the former judge Suafee Affandi. 




Saturday, January 14, 2023

Tokoh Wartawan Negara Rejal Arbee lied under oath about his knowledge of Singapore billionaire Peter Lim's business in Malaysia - Recent spotlight on Lim's business in Malaysia calls for an investigation of Rejal's perjury ,and Lim's businesses

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


      Vincent Tan,and in the inset,Peter Lim


As recently reported on a related blog,   Tong Kooi Ong's pursuit of Murad Khalid raises questions about Murad's business with Singapore billionaire Peter Lim, and raises even more questions for PM & FM Anwar Ibrahim when considering any application from Berjaya and Vincent Tan for a banking, finance or insurance business license or approval.


Additionally, Tong's spotlight (even if it be inadvertent) on Lim's businesses in Malaysia draws attention to Tokoh Wartawan Negara Rejal Arbee's perjury before the Industrial Court, Malaysia , in the matter of Sahathevan v Sun Media, when  he told court that an article in The Sun about Lim's businesses in Malaysia was wholly without basis. Arbee was at the relevant time Managing Editor of Sun Media Group, publisher of The Sun.

Rejal testified under oath with reference to the article that he  published, and not the article submitted which he and his subordinates edited to remove reference to the primary source of the story, Tan Sri Mokzhani Mahathir. 

Tong has resurrected these issues at a time when judicial matters are again prominent.  


TO BE READ WITH 

Thursday, January 7, 2021

In 1998  Sessions Crt judge  Saufee Affandi was specifically assigned to a contempt matter involving Vincent Tan's Sun Media, and managed to place blame on the Sun reporter while excusing Sun Media and its editor Rejal Arbee; Saufee's conduct in '98 adds context to his legal innovation in favour of Sun Media, Singapore billionaire Peter Lim, Vincent Tan ,their business partners , and others in the matter of Ganesh Sahathevan v Sun Media 

 by Ganesh Sahathevan

tokoh 15 (8)            YBhg Datuk Ahmad Rejal Arbee



As reported earlier on this blog, former Industrial Court Chairman Saufee Affandi managed to turn an Industrial Court claim by this writer against Vincent Tan's Sun Media into a defamation matter where he undertook to prosecute the case for Singapore billionaire Peter Lim and his business partners, despite not having any authority to do so, and despite Lim himself never commencing a claim against Sun Media or this writer. 

It has also been reported here how Saufee mismanaged  and in essence attempted to discredit evidence against Bursa companies Gamuda Bhd, Litrak Bhd and the EPF which had financed their privatised LITRAK toll road project, which had been discovered by this writer.


It can now be revealed that Saufee had a prior, and perhaps more questionable involvement with Sun Media in 1998 when he served as a Sessions Court judge. The matter was reported by The SUN (which is published by Sun Media): 

A Sun reporter was fined RM 2,500 today when he admitted defying a court order which prohibited the publication of certain information in the case of a sessions judge who allegedly performed oral sex on a man. Sessions judge Saufee Affendi, who had come from Kuala Lumpur to specially hear the case. 

A conviction under this sub-section carries a maximum fine of RM 5,000 or jail up to three years or both. Arulldas, who paid the fine, was accompanied by Sun Media Group editor-in-chief Ahmad Rejal Arbee and editor Andy Ng.


Why Vincent Tan's Sun Media and its editors Ahmad Rejal Arbee and Andy Ng who actually published the story were not also charged is mystifying. 

Even more mystifying is the fact that Saufee  accepted that the crime of contempt had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt  against a  reporter who had absolutely no power to publish. The contempt, described above involved the publication of facts which were subject to a court order against publication.