Wednesday, October 5, 2022

Defence Department Shangri-La data breach - Why is Defence silent about Shangri-La's Hong Kong base, China connections

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


The ABC has reported:

Between May and July this year, customer data was stolen from eight Shangri-La hotels across Asia, including the luxury Singapore venue where Defence Minister Richard Marles held top-level security talks with China shortly after Labor's election win

The Defence Department confirmed it was aware of a data breach affecting Shangri-La hotels and said it was "working with the company to understand the impact on Australian Defence attendees at the Shangri-La Dialogue".

Despite the now normal concerns about Chinese Government linked hacking, Defence has remained silent, or prefers to left unsaid the fact that the company is headquartered in Hong Kong

Shangri-La Asia Ltd. is an investment holding company, which engages in the ownership and operation of hotels and real estate properties. The company was founded on August 14, 1992 and is headquartered in Hong Kon.


In fact, the Shangri-La Singapore was the first in the chain, and was established by billionaire Robert Kuok who remains very much in control of the company

Kuok's Communist Party China connections and his loyalty to what he describes as his motherland are well known. In his words: 

Shangri-La Beijing, my first major hotel project in China, was granted only a 13-year cooperation period. “I do it for the love of my motherland, the birthplace of my parents. It’s in the marrow of my bones to help the country.

(“Robert Kuok—A Memoir” written by Robert Kuok with Andrew Tanzer,2017)

TO BE READ WITH 
Published:  Nov 27, 2017 3:14 PM
Updated: 7:11 PM

Tycoon Robert Kuok does not speak about communism with contempt, despite being a capitalist.

In his latest memoir, Kuok revealed that his brother William rose to become the propaganda chief of the Malayan Communist Party (MCP).

Despite their diverging paths, Kuok spoke kindly about his brother, describing him as one who stood up against injustice and for the poor. He had one other brother, Philip.

Kuok said William had dabbled with the idea of joining the MCP to fight the Japanese occupiers, having witnessed the atrocities by them, particularly against the Chinese in Malaya due to the Sino-Japanese War.

ADS

However, Kuok said his brother did not join the MCP then as there was fear that being found out would lead to retribution on the entire family.

"I believe William joined the MCP in late 1945 or 1946. He never let on. I think his reason for keeping it close to his chest was not to implicate his family, because the British were hounding and persecuting the Communists who were literally driven into the jungle," he said in his memoir, a copy of which was obtained by Malaysiakini.

Before the British crackdown, Kuok said William moved to Kuala Lumpur and ran a tabloid newspaper as a mouthpiece for the left wing and after it was shut down by the colonial government, William became active in the militant Singapore Harbour Board Union.

ADS

"I was never derisive about William's activities of helping the poor and championing the cause of the labour unions. However, I didn't think that business and politics needed to go together.

"He, on the other hand, felt that I was only keen on making money. One day in 1948, he sat me down and told me I was wrong, and that sooner or later I would recognise the worth of his advise - that politics and economics, and politics and business were intertwined," he said.

Kuok said William entered the jungle in 1948 and it was then he realised life was not only about making money.

"Here was my own brother, one of the finest human beings I have known, risking his own life to help the downtrodden.

"When mother learnt about William, she never uttered a word; but I think she must have felt the terrible sacrifice of her own flesh and blood," said Kuok.

Kuok said the British ambushed William and his two bodyguards in the jungle along the border of Negeri Sembilan and Pahang in August 1953, killing them. William was 30 years old.

Role in ending MCP

Despite relocating to Hong Kong, Kuok said he was still dragged back into Malaysian politics and one such instance was then inspector-general of police Rahim Noor seeking his help to convey messages to the Communist government of China.

ADS

"The special branch of the Malaysian police contacted me often to say: 'Can you pass this message to China?' They asked China to silence the MCP radio, which was making broadcasts hostile to the Malaysian government.

"I passed the word and the radio was silenced," he said.

Kuok said he later sought a written commitment from China that it would no longer support the MCP, at the request of Rahim.

The tycoon said he was brought to an undisclosed location in Guangzhou, China, where a Chinese operative consulted him on the wording of the statement.

Kuok advised that the statement was what Kuala Lumpur wanted to hear but there were two paragraphs that could negate the statement and advised for them to be removed.

The operative agreed, but said the statement had been approved by a senior leader and asked Kuok to propose a solution.

With the operative's permission, Kuok whited out the undesired paragraphs and faxed the message back to Rahim.

"A few months later, the Malaysian government and Chin Peng signed a truce agreement. His people came out of the jungle, symbolically laid down their arms, pledged allegiance to Malaysia and the Malaysian Communist Party was no more," he said.

RELATED STORIES

From Malay shareholding to PM's aide, Kuok recounts path to MISC disposal

Mom kept billionaire from profiteering at the expense of the poor


Robert Kuok: A Memoir became available in Hong Kong and Singapore on Nov 25. It will be released in Malaysia on Dec 1.

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Only public hearings of a Federal ICAC can uncover misconduct at quasi-judicial bodies such as the NSW LPAB, and the anomalies in its business with the Communist Party China linked Zhu Minshen and his Top Education Group

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


While debate continues about the extent to which the proposed Federal ICAC's inquiries ought be public, the mystery that continues to surround the apparent misconduct at  the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board and the anomalies in its dealings with the Communist Party China linked Zhu Minshen and his Top Education Group serve to provide a useful case study  for the argument that the inquiries ought to be public. 


The NSW LPAB is a quasi-judicial body which is chaired by the Chief Justice Of NSW. As detailed in the story below, the secrecy that it is afforded given its status allowed it to grant Zhu Minshen favours never granted any other individual and private entity. In this case the favours were granted despite Zhu's Communist Party China ties, and the political donation scandal that he was embroiled in.


TO BE READ WITH 







Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Did the Law Council Australia and the NSW LPAB ignore ASIO advice in granting Zhu Minshen the right to grant LLB degrees, and entree into Australia's legal system?

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Hon George Brandis




AAP reported in November 2019:

Retired ASIO chief Duncan Lewis has accused the Chinese government of using 'insidious' foreign interference operations to 'take over' Australia's political system.
Anyone in political office could be a target, the former spy chief told the political journal Quarterly Essay in an interview to be published next week.
Mr Lewis claimed Chinese authorities were trying to 'place themselves in a position of advantage' by in political, social, business and media circles, The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday, citing the interview.

Despite that warning, the NSW LPAB renewed Zhu Minshen's  right to grant LLB degrees, and entree into Australia's legal system:



In fact, questions about Zhu Minshen were raised by the former Commonwealth Attorney General George Brandis as early as 2016:



Former AG George Brandis raised questions about Zhu Minshen and Top Education Group which remain unanswered, but Zhu and Top are today even more entrenched in the NSW and Australian legal system, thanks to the NSW LPAB and its chairman the CJ NSW, and the AG NSW



Despite all of the above, the Law Council Australia as well as NSW LPAB seem determined to continue supporting Zhu and Top Group:


Zhu Minshen's new Chinese website says the Law Council of Australia "officially approved" Top Education Instituter's application to issue law degrees


The NSW LPAB and Law Council Australia may  attempt  to deflect questions about all of the above by asserting that they are not required by law to seek the advice of ASIO when determining who may or many not grant law degrees in Australia. If they did, and even if the answer is legally correct, it would demonstrate poor judgment; entree into the legal system is always a matter of national security:

“....perhaps the only accredited degree program in Australia that counts agitating for a foreign power towards its qualifications": Why the Law Soc Australia & NSW LPAB's business with Zhu Minshen is a matter of national security


END 



















Retiring ASIO boss issues a chilling warning that China seeks to 'take over' Australia

  • Retired ASIO boss Duncan Lewis has warned of Chinese takeover of Australia
  • Mr Lewis has claimed Chinese authorities wanted to be in 'position of advantage'
  • His comments come after Liberal MPs were denied visas to travel to China 
Retired ASIO chief Duncan Lewis has accused the Chinese government of using 'insidious' foreign interference operations to 'take over' Australia's political system.
Anyone in political office could be a target, the former spy chief told the political journal Quarterly Essay in an interview to be published next week.
Mr Lewis claimed Chinese authorities were trying to 'place themselves in a position of advantage' by in political, social, business and media circles, The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday, citing the interview.
'Espionage and foreign interference is insidious. Its effects might not present for decades and by that time it's too late,' he said.
'You wake up one day and find decisions made in our country that are not in the interests of our country.'
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about'.
His remarks come after Liberal MPs Andrew Hastie and Senator James Paterson were denied visas to travel to China for a study tour after they criticised its human rights recordIn an opinion piece published in The Australian on Thursday, senior Chinese diplomat Wang Xining accused the MPs of having double standards and showing disrespect.
'It is cynical that in a country boasting freedom of speech, different views from another nation are constantly and intentionally obliterated,' Mr Wang wrote.
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about' (pictured is a reeducation centre in Xinjiang province)
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about' (pictured is a reeducation centre in Xinjiang province)

Tuesday, September 27, 2022

MH17 flight path anomaly explained -MH17 was shot down while flying toward the Ukraine-Russian border

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 




The diagram above and the  following  extract from the Dutch Government's MH17 crash investigation report may explain a question raised on a related blog in 2014, which was concerned with why MH17 alone was shot down but not the other planes that flew that route: 


The clearance direct to air navigation waypoint RND was acknowledged by the flight crew (of MH 17)at 13.19:56 (15.19:56 CET). This was the last radio transmission from flight MH17. Dnipro Radar immediately, at 13.20:00 (15.20:00 CET), advised flight MH17 to proceed to expect a clearance direct to waypoint TIKNA after RND. TIKNA is an air navigation waypoint in the Russian Federation located on airway A87. According to the air traffic control flight plan, flight MH17 had planned to use airway A87 after crossing the Ukrainian/Russian Federation border. No acknowledgement or further radio communication from flight MH17 was received.


To Be Read WIth


MH17:Statistics suggest an anomaly that needs to be investigated,and explained-That SQ 351 survived unscathed suggests an anomaly in MH 17's flight path 




While Malaysian authorities have rightly argued that MAS is not alone in flying that route over Ukraine, the statistics displayed below suggest  the  question that  should be asked is  why only MH 17 was shot down.

The diagram below is of airlines and their aircraft that transited that route in the week before the incident. 
As the diagram shows, there were almost twice as many Aeroflot flights on that route as there were MAS flights.
Singapore Airlines is the next most frequent.



Displaying overview.jpg


The question then , what was it that made MH 17 stand out from the rest? Did this reported diversion from the norm trigger the  BUK's target acquisition  system?

A total of six targets can be engaged simultaneously by a BUK  battery while they are flying on different bearings and at different altitudes and ranges. A typical battery comprises a Command Post (CP) vehicle, a Target Acquisition Radar (TAR) vehicle and six Self-Propelled Mounts (SPMs) that act as the launcher vehicles. A specialist Loader-Launcher (LL) vehicle that acts both as missile transloader and additional launch unit supports pair of launchers.
(see http://www.janes.com/article/40907/missile-profile-9k37-buk)
Given that SQ 351 was just 25 km  behind MH 17,and given that MH 17 was reported be in the "safe" altitude zone, one must ask how and why   SQ 351 came through unscathed but MH 17 did not.

END