Friday, September 13, 2019

The John Holland-CCCC takeover:: Australian Government approval granted despite Holland's 60 years worth of intelligence gathered from past and ongoing Defense contracts

by Ganesh Sahathevan



The 2015 takeover of John Holland Constructions by  China Communications Construction Company  was approved by the Foreign Investment Review Board and the then  Liberal Treasurer Joe Hockey despite JH's more than 60 years experience in providing engineering solutions to the Australian Department Of Defense.


In 2011 Holland was  ranked the largest contractor in the Defense facilities sector.These include the  Darwin  Robertson Barracks  project was awarded in 2013; the Darwin Port deal which  was concluded with Landbridge of China at about the same tine gives the Communist Party of China access to almost all US and Australian defense facilities in Northern Australia.
END 




AND 





12:05 PM · Sep 19, 2018Twitter Web Client

3
Retweets


















Foreign investment decision: acquisition of John Holland Group by China Communications Construction Company


Note
This media release annouces the Treasurer, the Hon Joe Hockey, has approved the foreign investment proposal by CCCC International Holding Limited to acquire John Holland Group Pty Limited.
Today I have approved the foreign investment proposal by CCCC International Holding Limited to acquire John Holland Group Pty Limited.
John Holland is one of Australia’s largest engineering and construction companies and employs over 5,600 people in eight countries.
CCCC International is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), the fourth-largest construction company in the world by revenue, with a presence in over 80 countries.
The Government welcomes foreign investment where it is not contrary to our national interest. Foreign investment has helped build Australia’s economy and will continue to enhance the wellbeing of Australians by supporting economic growth and prosperity.
I note there have been some media reports about CCCC in relation to a World Bank debarment in 2009. I have sought advice and action on these and other issues in relation to CCCC. As a result, appropriate arrangements have been put in place to mitigate any concerns in relation to this issue and I am satisfied that this investment is not contrary to our national interest.

Thursday, September 12, 2019

Communist Party China owned John Holland's NSW projects, and Malaysia's 1MDB scandal: Berejiklian Govt has ignored 2016 allegations, which have now been presented in court by Malaysia's AG's Chambers prosecutors

by Ganesh Sahathevan









In 2016 and again in January 2019 The Australian reported:

John Holland’s parent company, China Communications Construction

Company, was asked to inflate costs on a Malaysian project by about $US7.5bn

($10.4bn), more than doubling its cost, according to documents obtained by The

Australian.

The documents show that money siphoned off from the deal was to be used to

plug the multi-billion-dollar hole in Malaysia’s looted sovereign wealth fund,

1MDB, buy controlling stakes in two companies linked to the alleged

mastermind of the 1MDB fraud, Jho Low, and pay tens of millions of dollars to

unnamed consultants.

They also reveal the deal was pitched as “Malaysia’s acceptance of China’s One

Belt, One Road strategy” — an ambitious plan to project Beijing’s economic

power internationally by building billions of dollars worth of infrastructure

throughout Asia and Europe.

China agreed to finance the East Coast Rail Line, which was to link Kelantan,

near the border with Thailand on the northeast of the Malaysian peninsula, with

Port Klang, on the peninsula's western side near Kuala Lumpur, in November

2016.

The Australian reported on allegations the East Coast Rail Line contract had been inflated in August 2016, but is now able to reveal details of documents setting out the proposal. Last week, The Wall

Street Journal reported that Chinese officials offered to bail out 1MDB using

money siphoned off from infrastructure projects built in Malaysia as part of the

One Belt, One Road program.

(John Holland parent asked to inflate costs to plug $10.4bn 1MDB hole;By BEN BUTLER, BUSINESS REPORTER 12:00AM JANUARY 14, 2019


Over the past week prosecutors from Malaysia's Attorney General's Chambers presented evidence in the trial of former Prime Minister Najib Razak, who has been charged with offences relating to the 1MDB scandal , confirming the stories in The Australian going back to 2016 (see story below).

In May last year the Trudeau government of Canada blocked China Communications Construction

Company takeover of Aecon Canada’s third largest construction company t for “national security” reasons.


Despite all of the above, John Holland continues to win major projects from the NSW Government and remains a prominent donor.

Multiplex and John Holland have emerged as frontrunners to build the new stadium at the old Moore Park Allianz Stadium site , following developer Lendlease's sudden exit from the project in July.


The company does have a long history in Australia, but the CCCC takeover does change things.




END 







Malaysia had plan to use Chinese money to bail out 1MDB, court hearsRozanna Latiff, Joseph Sipalan



KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysia’s former leader Najib Razak approved a plan to bail out troubled state fund 1MDB by offering stakes in several big infrastructure projects to Chinese firms in 2016, a former aide told a court on Wednesday.



FILE PHOTO: Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak leaves Kuala Lumpur High Court in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia August 28, 2019. REUTERS/Lai Seng Sin

Najib, who was voted out of power last year amid public anger over alleged graft at 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), is on trial for allegedly receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from the state fund he set up in 2009.

He has pleaded not guilty.

Former special officer Amhari Effendi Nazaruddin said Najib sent him to China in June 2016 on a “secret mission” to reaffirm economic ties and investments between the two countries.

The talking points prepared for his meeting with Chinese officials showed there were plans to use Chinese investments to help pay off the debts of 1MDB and its former unit, SRC International, Amhari told the Kuala Lumpur High Court.

“The phrase ‘while simultaneously completely resolving 1MDB and SRC debts’ clearly meant that Najib intended to send the message that this cooperation would aid 1MDB and SRC International through the bailout of 1MDB’s debts,” Amhari said, referring to the talking points.

China has denied reports that its officials had offered to bail out 1MDB in 2016, saying it never attaches political conditions to its cooperation with other countries.


ADVERTISEMENT


Amhari said among the deals offered to Chinese companies to fund the bailout were two pipeline projects and the $20 billion East Coast Rail Link (ECRL), a major part of China’s Belt and Road initiative.

The pipeline projects were later canceled and the cost of the railway project nearly halved to $11 billion after Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad took over last year.

Mahathir, who swiftly reopened probes into 1MDB, has said investigators are looking into whether a $2.3 billion loan from the Export-Import Bank of China for the two pipeline projects was used to repay 1MDB debts.

China Communications Construction Co. Ltd, the lead contractor for the ECRL project, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Amhari’s testimony.

Amhari said his talking points were prepared by fugitive Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho, or Jho Low, who attended the meeting with Chinese officials as a translator.

Low, who faces charges in the United States and Malaysia over his alleged central role in the 1MDB scandal, has denied wrongdoing. His whereabouts are unknown.

“In summary, based on the situation that had unfolded and the documents prepared by Jho Low, I believe that Najib had knowledge and had given the mandate to Jho Low to plan and manage efforts to bail out 1MDB and SRC from its losses and debts,” Amhari said.


ADVERTISEMENT


Malaysian and U.S. investigators say that at least $4.5 billion was misappropriated from 1MDB by Low and other high-level officials of the fund and their associates.

Najib’s trial continues on Thursday.


Reporting by Rozanna Latiff and Joseph Sipalan; editing by Darren Schuettler
Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

In 1999 Zhu Minshen became managing director of Urban Property Development Co., Ltd-Peter Hall QC and ICAC duty bound to investigate this information which is (also) in the public domain

by Ganesh Sahathevan
ICAC Chief Commissioner Peter Hall will head an inquiry that involves NSW Labor.

In his current inquiry into Chinese donations to the Labor Party ,ICAC Commissioner Peter
Hall QC(picture above) seems reluctant to go anywhere near the matter of Zhu Minshen and his Top Group,whose
donations to the NSW Liberal Party may have consequences for Hall's former colleagues at the NSW Bar and Bench who manage the Legal Profession Admission Board, the body that has provided Zhu the status of a law school vice chancellor.
Troy Grant MP

NSW Libs received donations of $44,275 from TOP Education Grosup 


This writer has raised the question for which an answer has yet to be provided:
Is Zhu Minshen a property developer,should the NSW Liberals have accepted his money.


It was reported in the above article that while  Zhu's Top Group is in the business of providing teaching services,  Zhu himself is reported  to be a well known investor in real estate(see article in Chinese below). Additionally Clive Hamilton in his book "Silent Invasion"  asserts that Zhu started a property development company in 1996 from which he made "tens of millions of dollars". 

The Chinese language article that Hamilton relied on has been translated in part and includes this paragraph: 

In 1996, Zhu Minshen began to get involved in the real estate industry. In 1999, he became the managing director of Urban Property Development Co., Ltd., and his business also achieved tens of millions of Australian dollars from several million Australian dollars.

At the beginning of 1999, Zhou Wenzhong, the Chinese ambassador to Australia, visited Sydney to visit new and old Chinese and overseas Chinese. He went to Zhu Minshen’s real estate site to look at it.

That is not the only reference to Zhu as a property developer. The article below which seems to be more readily found on the Net includes this paragraph: 

At this time, Sydney is starting to heat up because of the Olympic Games, so since 1996, Zhu Minshen has been involved in the real estate industry. In that year, he founded the Superstar real estate company and registered millions of Australian dollars. It is not easy to do real estate in Australia. The labor cost is high, the construction industry is very powerful, and the requirements of the city hall for building houses are very cumbersome, and it is difficult to approve. Despite this, Zhu Minshen still feels that there are a lot of business opportunities in the world. According to his usual practice, he has kept his target on the upper class in Australia. He has posted all the advertisements in the mainstream media in Australia, and the agents are also Westerners. Because of the large amount of advertising, “Superstar” soon became known.
Now the company of Zhu Minshen is making hundreds of houses every year with a turnover of tens of millions of Australian dollars.

Peter Hall and ICAC's continued refusal to call Zhu Minshen and gather all and any evidence of his activities, including his property development businesses, raises questions about the ICAC Chief Commissioner's objectivity.If he cannot show that he is not conflicted with regards the current Attorney General Marp Speakman and the ruling NSW Liberal Party , he should at minimum step down as chair of the current inquiry.

END 






Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Zhu Minshen's links to China's United Front add to national security and legal concerns but Zhu remains part of Australia's legal establishment : Law Council Australia & judicial bodies silence embarrassing, damages reputation of Australian lawyers in this region

by Ganesh Sahathevan



As reported  on this blog:


Law Council Australia cannot lecture Chinese lawyers while it provides cover to CPC linked Minshen Zhu

The extent of that cover has become clearer with this posting on Twitter by Geoffrey Wade, Visiting fellow at the Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University.






Australia: Note presence of Zhu Minshen 祝敏申 of Top Education Institute on listing of Australians on the Fifth Committee (2013-17) of China’s national united front body China Overseas Exchange Association 中国海外交流协会第五届理事会理事名单.
Quote Tweet
Geoff Wade
@geoff_p_wade
·
Australia: Listing of Australians on the Fifth Committee (2013-17) of China’s national united front body China Overseas Exchange Association 中国海外交流协会第五届理事会理事名单. Includes Ernest Wong, Arthur Wu, Yu Aibing, Zhu Minshen archive.is/SaoML
https://twitter.com/geoff_p_wade/status/1171963444792188928/photo/3

The links show that other Australian academics are also involved in United Front activities. Zhu however is in a superior position to all of them for he alone can decide who among his students may be allowed to practise law in Australia as a result of the powers bestowed on him by the NSW Legal Profession Board, which is chaired by the Chief Justice Thomas Bathurst ,and under the purview of the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman SC.
The Law Council Australia's Arthur Moses is like Speakman a member of the NSW Bar; in fact he is its immediate past president. The LPAB has stated that it consulted with the Law Council before granting Zhu and his Top Group license to award law degrees.
No where else in this region has any legal regulatory body granted a Chinese Government linked body such privileges. That combined with the fact that an Australian law degree can now be obtained from a private company is harming the reputation Australian lawyers once had in this region. In that context Arthur Moses lecturing Hong Kong's lawyers borders on the farcical.See also:

AG NSW Speakman and senior judicial officers at the LPAB ignored the fact that Zhu Minshen undermined an Australian Federal Police directive