Showing posts sorted by date for query prospectus. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query prospectus. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, July 7, 2025

Gamuda in Australian political scandal linked to $5bn state government contract to build a new Sunshine Coast rail line- Shades of the 2003 MMC Gamuda multi-billion ringgit electrified double-tracking rail project corruption scandal

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



As previously reported on this blog:

Gamuda has a long and illustrious history in its home country, Malaysia, as this writer well knows. In 1997  another reporter and he revealed that Gamuda was launching an IPO on the basis of an incomplete prospectus, based on a project funded by the Malaysian national superannuation fund at ridiculously low rates. We were sacked for doing so.

Gamuda's cash surpluses that are now enabling its expansion into Australian wind and solar, come from toll road operations imposed on users in Malaysia's Klang Valley.It is not unfair to say that it ranks among Malaysia's most reviled, for that that reason alone.


As anticipated, Gamuda is now implicated in a scandal in Australia. The Australian has reported:

A registered lobbyist organised a meeting with his state Transport Minister brother-in-law for a client, a major engineering company vying to win a



The Australian can reveal that Counsel House lobbyist Pete Coulson invited Gamuda Engineering to an “intimate” budget-night fundraiser in aid of Queensland Transport and Main Roads Minister Brent Mickelberg, the brother of Mr Coulson’s wife.

While Mr Coulson and Mr Mickelberg have received advice not to engage in lobbying with each other, the minister and the representative from Gamuda Engineering met and spoke at the Parliament House event.

........(Gamuda) tried to give the party $25,000 to sponsor the LNP’s major post-budget lunch but the donation was returned.

The above brings to mind the 2003 MMC-Gamuda multi-billion ringgit electrified double-tracking rail project in Malaysia. 


TO BE READ WITH 

Nation
The lobbyist, the minister, and the $5bn rail line bid
Sarah Elks
691 words
6 July 2025
20:00
AUSTOL
English
© News Pty Limited. No redistribution is permitted.

BeyondWords Text to Speech Georgina's voice

A registered lobbyist organised a meeting with his state Transport Minister brother-in-law for a client, a major engineering company vying to win a $5bn state government contract to build a new Sunshine Coast rail line.

The Australian can reveal that Counsel House lobbyist Pete Coulson invited Gamuda Engineering to an “intimate” budget-night fundraiser in aid of Queensland Transport and Main Roads Minister Brent Mickelberg, the brother of Mr Coulson’s wife.

While Mr Coulson and Mr Mickelberg have received advice not to engage in lobbying with each other, the minister and the representative from Gamuda Engineering met and spoke at the Parliament House event.

Mr Coulson was not part of the conversation and was elsewhere in the room.

Gamuda has been preparing to bid for one of the biggest projects in Mr Mickelberg’s portfolio – the Direct Sunshine Coast Rail Line, now called “the Wave” – since November, when it hired a Brisbane-based “bid manager” focused on tendering for the public transport link.

When finished, there will be rail from the existing train station at Beerwah (on the southern end of the coast) to Birtinya (part of Kawana), and then “metro” express buses from Birtinya to the Sunshine Coast airport via Maroochydore.

Before winning the October state election, the LNP promised to deliver a heavy rail line all the way to Maroochydore.

The Australian reported in June that Mr Coulson had organised the guest list for Mr Mickelberg’s fundraiser, but the lobbyist said he wasn’t at the event in a professional capacity and had never lobbied his brother-in-law as minister.

Mr Coulson’s invitation to prospective guests spruiked Treasurer David Janetzki as the guest of honour, and described the event as a “rare opportunity for key stakeholders” and others to gain “insider access to budget insights and transport priorities”.

Gamuda did not donate to the LNP to attend the event. In late May, the company tried to give the party $25,000 to sponsor the LNP’s major post-budget lunch but the donation was returned.

It is understood the party wanted the company to seek a declaration from the Queensland electoral commission that they were not a prohibited donor, to make sure the LNP did not fall foul of the law banning property developer donations.

A spokesman for Mr Mickelberg’s department said he could not say whether Gamuda was one of the project’s proponents because the department was “currently in a procurement process for The Wave, which is subject to probity”.

The departmental spokesman said there was “no requirement for a probity adviser to be present at all interactions involving a minister and industry representatives”.

“The Minister for Transport and Main Roads has not been involved in any the procurement activities undertaken by (the Department of Transport and Main Roads) regarding The Wave,” he said.

It comes as Counsel House added multinational transport giant Uber to its list of registered lobbying clients in Queensland in late June.

The Australian understands that when Mr Coulson cannot lobby his Transport Minister brother-in-law on behalf of clients, another registered lobbyist – Melbourne-based Drew Douglas – will step in.

Mr Douglas was a senior political and policy adviser to Victorian Labor Premier Jacinta Allen when she was the deputy premier and transport minister. Neither Mr Coulson nor Gamuda Australia responded to questions.

Malaysia-based Gamuda has won several huge government transport projects in NSW, including Sydney’s Metro West underground metro rail, an extension of the M1 motorway, and the Coffs Harbour bypass.

In June, Mr Coulson – who worked for LNP leaders Deb Frecklington and Tim Nicholls in opposition – said he had supported the LNP for 20 years and would continue to do so.

“My relationship with Minister Mickelberg is properly declared, and I don’t represent clients in matters under his portfolio,” he said.

“I have never lobbied Minister Mickelberg in his ministerial capacity. Counsel House follows all lobbying laws and has backed stronger regulation in a recent submission to the integrity commissioner.”

Nationwide News Pty Ltd.

Sunday, May 4, 2025

Mark Speaman calls for Liberal Party to move to the 'sensible' centre -will still not say anything about his approval for Communist Party China 's Zhu Minshen's law school after Zhu's donations to the NSW Libs

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 





Meanwhile , this remains unexplained 



Friday, April 30, 2021

Zhu Minshen has passed away - NSW LPAB, Chairman Bathurst and AG Mark Speakman still refuse to explain why they made an exception in granting Zhu a license to grant law degrees, despite the political scandals that engulfed Zhu and his Top Group

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Zhu Minshen's Top Education Group Ltd informed the HK Stock Exchange on 30 April 2021 that he has passed away:



The NSW Legal Profession Admission Board, its Chairman Tom Bathurst (the Chief Justice NSW) and the Minister in charge, NSW Attorney General Mark Speakman, have yet to explain the "fishy smell" which still permeates  their  decision to grant Zhu the "first and only" license to grant law degrees that has ever been granted a private company.

TO BE READ WITH 


Wednesday, April 10, 2019

NSW Libs received donations of $44,275 from TOP Education Group just before after TOP was granted the "first & only" license issued a private company to award law degrees: AG Speakman and his LPAB refuse to disclose all details in the LPAB Annual Reports


by Ganesh Sahathevan


Troy Grant MP

Mark Speakman

As First Law Officer of the state, Mark oversees 
the administration of almost 200 Acts of Parliament, 
the most of any minister in the NSW Government. 


The Legal Profession Admission Board is a  statutory body chaired by the Chief Justice of New South Wales.Its annual report is tabled in the NSW Parliament by the Attorney General NSW , currently Mark Speakman SC,for approval.

The LPAB's duties include granting licenses for the award of  Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degrees to interested parties ,which until recently were all public universities. In 2015 the LPAB issued a license to grant LLBs to TOP Education Group Ltd, which proudly proclaims the fact that it is the "first and only" private company to have been granted such a license. 

The AG NSW is also the Liberal Member for Cronulla and he,as well as the LPAB , have been queried about the following issues discovered in the LPAB's 2015 Annual Report which relate to the TOP Group application. 

The  LPAB states in its 2015 Annual Report:

In addition, the LPAB received an application for accreditation of a new law degree to be offered by a non-university provider, TOP Education Institute (LLB).
The LPAB considered the advice of its Accreditation Sub-Committee and Legal Qualifications Committee, and also consulted with other admitting authorities through the Law Admissions Consultative Committee (LACC),  before deciding to accredit the new degree with effect from 1 January 2015.
http://www.lpab.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Annual%20Report%202014-15.



With regards the above the LPAB and the  AG have  been asked why in considering the TOP application they  appear not to have considered   TOP  Group's CEO and controlling shareholder Minshen Zhu's  business failures which were a matter of public record in 2015 ,and collated in its 2018 Prospectus issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering (IPO) of its stock and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Zhu's business failures are listed on page 160 and 167 of the IPO Prospectus. They are failures in small businesses which in turn raise questions about his capacity to fund a much larger venture like TOP.

The LPAB and AG were  also queried about the exclusion from the 2015 Annual Report of material that had been disclosed in the 2012 Annual Report where it is stated  that LPAB member  Dr Gordon Elkington was assigned to TEQSA to assist with the TOP  application for the relevant licenses from TEQSA. 

The exclusion from the 2015 annual report of the information disclosed in the 2012 annual report gives the impression that the LPAB's assessment of the TOP application in 2015 was a dealing with a party with which it had no prior relationship, when in fact it had.

All of the above would be of  concern to both students and investors given the dramatic collapse in TOP's share price, The AG and the LPAB have confirmed in writing that they are not interested in answering any of the questions above.


It has since been discovered that in the 4 months or so prior to the LPAB granting TOP  the license to issue law degrees, TOP made donations worth AUD 44 275 to the Liberal Party NSW Branch.










While  Mr Speakman is AG and the most senior law officer in the state, he is first and foremost a politician.He would not be AG had he not been elected.

It was to his party that the above donations have been made,and his refusal to answer the questions above does raise the perception that something is not quite right. 

His Department Of Justice has in the past shown that the Minister ,his Department Of Justice,and the LPAB can and do work together in the interest of their Minister and vice versa.This has included a recent non-disclosure of complaints against the LPAB and the College Of Law in the 2018 Annual Report.

Hence it is not unreasonable to expect that together they  provide answers to these issues which are of public interest,and which concern their conduct as public servants.


END 



Saturday, April 13, 2024

One of Malaysia's best connected, most reviled infrastcruture players will invest billions in Australian wind and solar -Gamuda of Malaysia not known to make money on infrastructure without government support

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

Gamuda has a long and illustrious history in its home country, Malaysia, as this writer well knows. In 1997  another reporter and he revealed that Gamuda was launching an IPO on the basis of an incomplete prospectus, based on a project funded by the Malaysian national superannuation fund at ridiculously low rates. We were sacked for doing so.

Gamuda's cash surpluses that are now enabling its expansion into Australian wind and solar, come from toll road operations imposed on users in Malaysia's Klang Valley.It is not unfair to say that it ranks among Malaysia's most reviled, for that that reason alone.

Then in 2003 the award of a highly lucrative Government  rail project to Gamuda and its partners  had one opposition politician questioning the propriety of the process , and another demanding it be cancelled.

Latley in 2021 Gamuda was again the news about its corrupt practises, this time this time with regards MRT project in Kuala Lumpur. 

Gamuda's owners and managers are not known to make money on infrastructure projects without massive government backing. That Gamuda can see in Australian renewables opportunities to make money like its does in Malaysia should concern all Australian taxpayers. 



TO BE READ WITH 













Malaysian giant plans to build up to 2GW Australian wind and solar in five years
Image:Gamuda Bhd
Sophie Vorrath
Mar 25, 2024
0


RENEWABLES


Malaysian infrastructure giant Gamuda Berhad has announced it will turn its Australian market focus to renewables, with plans to build a 1 to 2 gigawatt portfolio of wind and solar projects within five years.

Gamuda, which in Australia is developing three major road and rail projects worth a total of $4.5 billion, says it also intends to bid for major EPC contracts in solar, wind, pumped hydro and transmission network upgrades and expansion.

It says it aims to generate $2 billion revenue from energy projects alone over the coming half-decade.





“Our vision is to become a leading sustainable energy contractor and a key equity partner for the long term with a particular focus on solar, wind, pumped hydro and transmission,” said Gamuda CEO Ewan Yee.

“This vision builds upon our ongoing success in the Australia infrastructure market and is informed by our energy and water infrastructure experience across a number of projects globally.

“We also see our demonstrated key strengths in completing complex large-scale linear construction, tunnelling, hydro and geotech in Australia as highly suited to now transition to energy projects,” Yee said.

This sort of skill set will be very welcome in Australia as the national push to 82 per cent renewables by 2030 gathers pace. Of particular interest is Gamuda Berhad’s shareholding in major Malaysian solar contracting company, ERS Energy, which offers access to a “robust” PV supply chain.

Jarred Hardman, Gamuda Engineering Australia’s chief strategy and growth officer, says the company brings with it a “ready to go” solution to help meet the rapidly approaching renewable targets.

“By looking to acquire development rights to shovel-ready projects we can construct and own in solar and wind, while we also secure EPC contracts in transmission and pumped hydro,” Hardman says.


“Our goal is to provide an end-to-end solution to fast-track energy projects and quickly gain a foothold, in keeping with our strategy in infrastructure which has seen us build a $4.5 billion workbook within two to three years.”

Gamuda’s push into Australian renewables follows that of Malaysia oil giant Petronas, whose renewables arm Gentari last year unveiled plans to build a portfolio of up to 8GW of solar, wind and storage capacity in Australia.

Gentari in February 2023 year took control of Wirsol Australia, a leading solar developer, before unveiling the company’s rebranding and expansion plans at a launch event in Sydney in September.

The company’s plans include big investments in India, Malaysia, and between 5GW and 8GW of renewables and storage capacity in Australia, with a mix of green fields development and buying existing assets.

Sophie Vorrath


Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. She is the co-host of the Solar Insiders Podcast. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Tuesday, August 1, 2023

Despite the Top Group , Sydney City School Of Law license trading, pump and dump scandal engulfing even the PwC scandal , Paul Brereton's NACC seems unconcerned

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


     National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Paul Brereton. The NACC received nearly 200 online referrals in just four                      days. (Edwina Pickles/SMH)


 Despite the Top Group , Sydney City School Of Law license trading, pump and dump  scandal  including even the PwC scandal ,  the  National Anti Corruption Commission headed by former NSW judge Paul Brererton  seem unconcerned. 


Meanwhile, Top Group continues to enjoy access to Commonwealth Government  funding, and its Sydney City School Of Law, to produce law graduates who qualify for admission to practise before the NSW Supreme Court, in which Brererton served as a judge. 


The matter of Top Group and its Sydney City School Of Law has been in the public domain for more than 7 years. The NACC and Brererton should not need a referral to commence investigation.




TO BE READ WITH 

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

PwC scandal extends to Top Education Group's pump and dump IPO - ABC says PwC and PwC partners acquired pre-IPO shares, while PwC was advising TEQSA : Top's IPO relied on the TEQSA and NSW LPAB approvals

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

Top Group's IPO was a classic pump and dump


Linton Besser and Echo Hui of ABC Investigation reported this morning: 

PricewaterhouseCoopers began work on a top-level consulting contract with the federal government's regulator of tertiary colleges 24 hours before agreeing to acquire a $5.5 million stake in one such college, the controversial Top Education Group.

In addition, eight senior partners of PwC — including two who oversaw the firm while it misused confidential Treasury data, prompting a global crisis — personally invested another $2.5 million in the company a year later.

The investments in 2016 and 2017, totalling $8 million, were made in the run-up to the May 2018 float of the company on the Hong Kong securities exchange. PwC's former chief executive Tom Seymour sat on Top Education Group's board until last year.

Despite this significant shareholding in the college, PwC continued to take on consulting work for the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), even though Top Education Group was directly impacted by TEQSA's regulatory decisions.


The ABC Investigations revelation add to the evidence that the Top Group IPO was a case of license trading that involved a classic pump and dump (see story below), enabled by the NSW LPAB and TEQSA. Top Group's IPO relied on the TEQSA and NSW LPAB approvals, dislcosed prominently in the IPO prospectus. 

Top's share price has never recivered, and keeps testing new lows.






To Be Read With 

Monday, March 20, 2023

HK listed Top Group's IPO was a classic case of license trading, and questions remain about any contributions to the NSW Liberals political fund - NSW AG Mark Speakman who issued the license remains silent

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Troy Grant MP

Mark Speakman

As First Law Officer of the state, Mark oversees 
the administration of almost 200 Acts of Parliament, 
the most of any minister in the NSW Government


The Top Group IPO was a classic pump and dump, and it was based on the license to award law degrees granted by NSW Attorney General Meak Speakman and his NSW Legal Profession Admission Board. Much has transpired to complicate matters since the IPO and the collapse in share price and market capitalisation, but the Speakman remains silent.


In Hong Kong and other Asian markets there will be questions raised and an investigation intot he pump and dump and political funding,  but in Australia there has been nothing of that sort. Of course, Speakman is also the minister in charge of the state corruption agency, and is part of the panel that determines who heads it. 


TO BE READ WITH 


Sunday, September 15, 2019

Top Group IPO a classic case of license trading: Post IPO spike & collapse in market cap raises obvious questions about any political party beneficiaries ,but Peter Hall & ICAC not interested

by Ganesh Sahathevan










The graph above shows the movements in Zhu Minshen's Top Group's share price since its IPO and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

It is easy to see that there was an initial spike after which share price and market capitalisation collapsed.

Anyone familiar with Asian markets will see that the Top Group listing and movement in share price follows the well trodden path of companies that list as soon as hard to get approvals are obtained and then sold via an IPO. In the case of Top Group the relevant approval was the "first and only" license to grant Australian law degrees granted a private company, granted by the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board,after consultation with the Law Council Australia.




It has already been shown on this blog that the granting of that license coincided with donations from Top and Zhu to the NSW Liberal Party. Consequently a inquiry into who the beneficiaries of the IPO were seems a logical step for an inquiry into political donations in NSW, but not it seems for Peter Hall QC and ICAC.




See
Peter Hall QC and ICAC have been provided information about Top Group by Dr Amen Lee, but ICAC will still not call Zhu Minshen




AND



TOP Education Institute's Bachelor of Laws : Political donations,HK Stock Exchange IPO seem to have left regulators confounded, speechless

END 

Friday, May 26, 2023

Former NSW Speaker has become director of penny stock company that has lost 90 % of IPO high -Jonathan O'Dea appointment as non-executive director of the Communist Party China linked Top Education Group Ltd a reflection of former ICAC head Peter Hall's incompetence in investigating political donations

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 






The former Speaker Of The NSW Legislative Assembly Jonathan O'Dea has been appointed non-executive director of the Communist Party China linked Top Education Group Ltd. His choice of post political employment  is intriguing , for Top Group  has lost over  90 % of its market capitalisation since its listing in 2018. 

Top Group continues to be a source of scandal due in part to the incompetence of former ICAC chief Peter Hall. Hall refused to call Top Group's founder , principal and major shareholder  Zhu Minshen in the course of his investigation into political donations by the Communist Party Of China, despite the evidence before him that clearly linked Top Group to that scandal. 


To Be Read With 


Monday, May 22, 2023

Former Speaker Of The NSW Legislative Assembly Jonathan O'Dea appointed non-executive director of the Communist Party China linked Top Education Group Ltd -Another NSW Liberal link to the scandal plagued Top Education Group

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



                     

Liberal MP Jonathan O'Dea at an ACETCA event.

Liberal MP Jonathan O'Dea at an ACETCA event.         



The former Speaker Of The NSW Legislative Assembly Jonathan O'Dea has been appointed non-executive director of the Communist Party China linked Top Education Group Ltd. 


O'Dea was Liberal member for Davidson, and an ally of Gladys Berejiklian.  Top Group received approval from the NSW LPAB to award law degrees around the time Top and its founder Zhu Minshen donated AUD 44 275 to the NSW Liberal Party. That apporval was renewed under the watch of former NSW Attorney General Mark Speakman, who is the crurrent leader of the NSW Liberals,and Leader Of The Opposition.

Monday, March 20, 2023

HK listed Top Group's IPO was a classic case of license trading, and questions remain about any contributions to the NSW Liberals political fund - NSW AG Mark Speakman who issued the license remains silent

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Troy Grant MP

Mark Speakman

As First Law Officer of the state, Mark oversees 
the administration of almost 200 Acts of Parliament, 
the most of any minister in the NSW Government


The Top Group IPO was a classic pump and dump, and it was based on the license to award law degrees granted by NSW Attorney General Meak Speakman and his NSW Legal Profession Admission Board. Much has transpired to complicate matters since the IPO and the collapse in share price and market capitalisation, but the Speakman remains silent.


In Hong Kong and other Asian markets there will be questions raised and an investigation intot he pump and dump and political funding,  but in Australia there has been nothing of that sort. Of course, Speakman is also the minister in charge of the state corruption agency, and is part of the panel that determines who heads it. 


TO BE READ WITH 


Sunday, September 15, 2019

Top Group IPO a classic case of license trading: Post IPO spike & collapse in market cap raises obvious questions about any political party beneficiaries ,but Peter Hall & ICAC not interested

by Ganesh Sahathevan










The graph above shows the movements in Zhu Minshen's Top Group's share price since its IPO and listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

It is easy to see that there was an initial spike after which share price and market capitalisation collapsed.

Anyone familiar with Asian markets will see that the Top Group listing and movement in share price follows the well trodden path of companies that list as soon as hard to get approvals are obtained and then sold via an IPO. In the case of Top Group the relevant approval was the "first and only" license to grant Australian law degrees granted a private company, granted by the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board,after consultation with the Law Council Australia.




It has already been shown on this blog that the granting of that license coincided with donations from Top and Zhu to the NSW Liberal Party. Consequently a inquiry into who the beneficiaries of the IPO were seems a logical step for an inquiry into political donations in NSW, but not it seems for Peter Hall QC and ICAC.




See
Peter Hall QC and ICAC have been provided information about Top Group by Dr Amen Lee, but ICAC will still not call Zhu Minshen




AND



TOP Education Institute's Bachelor of Laws : Political donations,HK Stock Exchange IPO seem to have left regulators confounded, speechless

END 

Thursday, December 22, 2022

Amen Lee, ICAC witness, is now chairman of Top Education Group Ltd, licensed by the NSW LPAB to grant law degrees in NSW

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 







Amen Lee, ICAC witness, is now chairman of Top Education Group Ltd, which is licensed by the NSW LPAB to grant law degrees in NSW.


TO BE READ WITH


Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Amen Lee is part of Top Education Group's Controlling Shareholder Group: Fresh questions for NSW LPAB,AG Speakman ,and NSW Libs over issuance of Top's LLB license and political donations ; Peter Hall's position at ICAC increasingly untenable

by Ganesh Sahathevan

ICAC Chief Commissioner Peter Hall will head an inquiry that involves NSW Labor.

In his current inquiry into Chinese donations to the Labor Party ,ICAC Commissioner Peter
Hall QC(picture above) seems reluctant to go anywhere near the matter of Zhu Minshen and his Top Group,whose
donations to the NSW Liberal Party may have consequences for Hall's former colleagues at the NSW Bar and Bench who manage the Legal Profession Admission Board, the body that has provided Zhu the status of a law school vice chancellor.


While Liberal Party donor Zhu Minshen has been, this far, the focus of attention with regards Top Education Group and its license to issue LLB degrees, f Dr Amen Lee, former Executive Chairman of the Australia China Trade, Economic and Cultural Association's (ACETCA), appears to have had an equal even if less prominent role in the matter.

In August this year Amen Lee told ICAC:

"If I do attend these (fundraising) events they are paid for by Top Education or ACETCA. I have not and would not attend as an individual," Dr Lee said. Top Education is a company of which Dr Lee said he was a director and shareholder.


Top's 2019 Annual Report includes these disclosures: 

 The Company made history as it founded the very first Law School within a private higher education institute when both TEQSA and NSW LPAB officially accredited its degree program in Law.

Members of the Controlling Shareholders Group are parties acting in concert and on 13 October 2017, they entered into a confirmation deed to, among others, confirm that they have been acting together with an aim to achieving decisions at general meetings of the Company on a unanimous basis. Members of the Controlling Shareholders Group are the founding Shareholders or have invested in the Company at an early stage. Dr. Zhu and Mr. (Amen) Lee are the members of the Controlling Shareholders Group. As at 30 June 2019, all the members of the Controlling Shareholders Group together controlled 855,468,000 Shares. Under the SFO, each of Dr. Zhu and Mr. Lee is deemed to be interested in the Shares beneficially owned by the other members of the Controlling Shareholders Group.



As at 30 June 2019 Zhu controlled 38.16% of Top's shares, while  Amen Lee controlled 33.46%. 



The above suggests that there is some overlap between Top Group and ACETCA.
All of the above raises many questions as to who else supported Top's introduction into state and federal political ,and legal circles.


The LPAB and the AG Mark Speakman have refused to answer any questions about the license issued Top Group. In addition ICAC chairman Peter Hall has refused to call Minshen Zhu as a witness to the ongoing inquiry into Chinese political donations, despite Amen Lee's testimony. Hall would be required to call Zhu, and those responsible within the LPAB, which is chaired by the Chief Justice of NSW Tom Bathurst, and overseen by the AG, MArk Speakman. 
Hall's position is as chairman of the ongoing inquiry and of ICAC seems increasingly untenable. He should resign.
END 

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

Corruption in issuance of NSW coal mining licenses inevitable, but issuance of a "first and only" license to grant law degrees to a Communist Party China linked entity perfectly normal -NSW ICAC

  by Ganesh Sahathevan 






Nine and others reported in 2013:

It was almost inevitable that coal mining licensing in NSW would be exploited because the system was so conducive to corruption, the state's watchdog says.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) has slammed the department of resources licensing process, saying it would have been "inconceivable" for any other portfolio to have been so open to exploitation for the benefit of a select few.
It comes after the ICAC found earlier this year that former mining minister Ian Macdonald rigged a 2008 tender process for a coal licence in the Bylong Valley, which financially benefited the family of his then colleague Eddie Obeid

Then in 2018 former ICAC chief David Ipp was reported to have  said:

David Ipp, QC, formerly a judge of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), believes the New South Wales Government’s mining licence approval process is at risk of corruption, particularly given its handling of the Ridgelands coal mine renewal in the state’s Upper Hunter region.

“When a government goes to the trouble of creating an elaborate procedure for the granting of mining tenements and doesn’t respect its own laws it’s a recipe for corruption,” he told NSW paper Newcastle Herald.

“There is little point in creating this elaborate process if the government doesn’t comply and respect its own procedures. It becomes an illusion.”


On 20 December 2022. former NSW Labor mining minister Ian Macdonald faces a fresh prison sentence after being found guilty of misconduct in public office for bypassing a competitive process to give a lucrative coal licence.


Meanwhile NSW ICAC has remained silent about the issuance, and then renewal of a license to grant law degrees to the Communist Party China linked Zhu Minshen (recently deceased)  and his Top Education Group. Zhu described it as the "first and only" license to issue law degrees granted a private company that is not a university.  The license was renewed even after Zhu's involvement in the Sam Dastiyari scandal led to Dastiyari's resignation from the Senate



TO BE READ WITH 


Sunday, January 24, 2021

Zhu Minshen's law school has approval of TEQSA, the NSW LPAB (chaired by NSW Chief Justice Bathurst),but not certified by the Council Of Australian Law Deans -Inconsistency raises questions afresh about professional standards at the NSW LPAB, TEQSA and Law Council Australia

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Hon George Brandis
From left to right: Prof Eugene Clark, Hon George Brandis, Dr Minshen Zhu


In "Silent Invasion" Professor Clive Hamilton describes how Zhu Minshen and his Top Education Institute(and other Chinese entities) interfere in Australian politics.The section on Zhu and Top begins :
"Few people noticed, but the fishy smell around Zhu Minshen's Top Education Institute was noticeable a few years before it began wafting from the front pages of the newspaper (such as the AFR in 2013)".

In 2012 the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board , a statutory body chaired by the Chief Justice NSW and under the purview of the Attorney General NSW ,began the process that led to Zhu and his Top Group being granted the "first and only" license to issue law degrees granted a private company that is not a university.

The notoriety that Zhu and Top Group had gained since 2013,and especially in 2016 seems to have been ignored in the process of evaluating Zhu's application, despite the very high standards of probity the LPAB ,the Chief Justice and the AG profess for anyone seeking admission to practice in NSW.


It has also been reported by this writer that

Zhu Minshen's new Chinese website says the Law Council of Australia "officially approved" Top Education Institute's application to issue law degrees


Now it has been discovered that Zhu Misnhen's Top Education Group Law School, also known as the Sydney City School Of Law, is not certified by the Council Of Australian Law Deans and its Australian Law Schools Standards Committee.

The Australian Law Schools Standards Committee (ALSSC) is established under Standard 12 of the Australian Law School Standards. The ALSSC’s functions are to:
consider and determine applications from law schools for certification as compliant with the Standards; and keep the Standards under review and to propose to CALD amendments from time to time.

The ALSSC is comprised of eight committee members from both within and outside the law school sector.

A list of the Australian Law Schools that are certified as at 9 March 2020 is available here.

https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Certified-Law-Schools-as-at-9-Mar-2020.pdf

Readers can see for themselves from the PDF link above that Zhu Misnhen's Top Education law school is not among those listed as being certified by the CALD.

That Zhu Minshen's law school has been approved by TEQSA, the NSW LPAB which is chaired by NSW Chief Justice Bathurst),but not certified by the Council Of Australian Law Deans is an inconsistency that raises questions afresh about professional standards at the NSW LPAB, TEQSA and Law Council Australia.

END

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Only public hearings of a Federal ICAC can uncover misconduct at quasi-judicial bodies such as the NSW LPAB, and the anomalies in its business with the Communist Party China linked Zhu Minshen and his Top Education Group

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


While debate continues about the extent to which the proposed Federal ICAC's inquiries ought be public, the mystery that continues to surround the apparent misconduct at  the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board and the anomalies in its dealings with the Communist Party China linked Zhu Minshen and his Top Education Group serve to provide a useful case study  for the argument that the inquiries ought to be public. 


The NSW LPAB is a quasi-judicial body which is chaired by the Chief Justice Of NSW. As detailed in the story below, the secrecy that it is afforded given its status allowed it to grant Zhu Minshen favours never granted any other individual and private entity. In this case the favours were granted despite Zhu's Communist Party China ties, and the political donation scandal that he was embroiled in.


TO BE READ WITH 







Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Did the Law Council Australia and the NSW LPAB ignore ASIO advice in granting Zhu Minshen the right to grant LLB degrees, and entree into Australia's legal system?

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Hon George Brandis




AAP reported in November 2019:

Retired ASIO chief Duncan Lewis has accused the Chinese government of using 'insidious' foreign interference operations to 'take over' Australia's political system.
Anyone in political office could be a target, the former spy chief told the political journal Quarterly Essay in an interview to be published next week.
Mr Lewis claimed Chinese authorities were trying to 'place themselves in a position of advantage' by in political, social, business and media circles, The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday, citing the interview.

Despite that warning, the NSW LPAB renewed Zhu Minshen's  right to grant LLB degrees, and entree into Australia's legal system:



In fact, questions about Zhu Minshen were raised by the former Commonwealth Attorney General George Brandis as early as 2016:



Former AG George Brandis raised questions about Zhu Minshen and Top Education Group which remain unanswered, but Zhu and Top are today even more entrenched in the NSW and Australian legal system, thanks to the NSW LPAB and its chairman the CJ NSW, and the AG NSW



Despite all of the above, the Law Council Australia as well as NSW LPAB seem determined to continue supporting Zhu and Top Group:


Zhu Minshen's new Chinese website says the Law Council of Australia "officially approved" Top Education Instituter's application to issue law degrees


The NSW LPAB and Law Council Australia may  attempt  to deflect questions about all of the above by asserting that they are not required by law to seek the advice of ASIO when determining who may or many not grant law degrees in Australia. If they did, and even if the answer is legally correct, it would demonstrate poor judgment; entree into the legal system is always a matter of national security:

“....perhaps the only accredited degree program in Australia that counts agitating for a foreign power towards its qualifications": Why the Law Soc Australia & NSW LPAB's business with Zhu Minshen is a matter of national security


END 



















Retiring ASIO boss issues a chilling warning that China seeks to 'take over' Australia

  • Retired ASIO boss Duncan Lewis has warned of Chinese takeover of Australia
  • Mr Lewis has claimed Chinese authorities wanted to be in 'position of advantage'
  • His comments come after Liberal MPs were denied visas to travel to China 
Retired ASIO chief Duncan Lewis has accused the Chinese government of using 'insidious' foreign interference operations to 'take over' Australia's political system.
Anyone in political office could be a target, the former spy chief told the political journal Quarterly Essay in an interview to be published next week.
Mr Lewis claimed Chinese authorities were trying to 'place themselves in a position of advantage' by in political, social, business and media circles, The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday, citing the interview.
'Espionage and foreign interference is insidious. Its effects might not present for decades and by that time it's too late,' he said.
'You wake up one day and find decisions made in our country that are not in the interests of our country.'
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about'.
His remarks come after Liberal MPs Andrew Hastie and Senator James Paterson were denied visas to travel to China for a study tour after they criticised its human rights recordIn an opinion piece published in The Australian on Thursday, senior Chinese diplomat Wang Xining accused the MPs of having double standards and showing disrespect.
'It is cynical that in a country boasting freedom of speech, different views from another nation are constantly and intentionally obliterated,' Mr Wang wrote.
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about' (pictured is a reeducation centre in Xinjiang province)
In the interview, Mr Lewis warns covert foreign intrusion into the heart of Australian politics is 'something we need to be very, very careful about' (pictured is a reeducation centre in Xinjiang province)