Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Loss of AUD 40-50 Million in PLT  revenue, unresolved scandal in Malaysia which includes false advertising by the former CEO, likely collapse of UK subsidiary - NSW Law Society must put College Of Law Australia into administration to protect members' interests 

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

In 2011 Justinian reported: 



The NSW Law Society has a veto power on the board of the College Of Law Australia (COL), under a constitution drawn up by Mallesons in December 2010. As founder of the college, the Law Society nominates a "preferred foundation ordinary member" to the COL's corporate entity, usually the Law Soc president .......The PFOM is not on the board of the college, but effectively can have the final say in most of its major decisions.


COL 's PLT brings in between AUD 40-50 Million in taxpayer funded FEE HELP, but that is now in danger of evaporating given NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell's public rubbishing of the College and its PLT.

Meanwhile COL has yet to provide any answers about its problems in Malaysia which includes false advertising by the former CEO Neville Carter. The collapse of its UK subsidiary, The College Of Legal Practise , seems unavoidable, especially now that COL's primary source of revenue seems likely.

The PFOM is not on the board of the college, but can , in effect, have the final say in most of its major decisions, and can therefore be regarded as a shadow director of COL.
The NSW Law Society can therefore be considered a shadow director of COL, and hence liable for the College's losses and liabilities arising out of its conduct.

Meanwhile COL's UK subsidiary , College Of Legal Practise UK seems to be on the brink of collapse.  Neither the UK nor Malaysian problems have been dislcosed in COL's annual reports.

NSW Law Society has no choice but to place COL into administration, in order to protect its members' interests.




TO BE READ WITH 










Tuesday, August 4, 2020


Bar Council education ‘JV’ must be clarified

By Editor , in Scandal on July 19, 2019 . Tagged width: College of Law , Fareed Gafoor , Malaysian Bar



KUALA LUMPUR, July 19 – The Malaysian Bar Council launched its first education venture, a LLM in Malaysian Legal Practise (LLM), last year in collaboration with the College Of Law Australia.

The LLM does not seem to have the approval of Malaysia’s Legal Professional Qualifying Board (LPQB) but the website for the course, which is hosted in Australia, prominently displays the Bar Council crest.



The crest has not been used before to promote a course of study, and queries put to Bar Council President Fareed Gafoor about the use of the crest have been acknowledged but remain unanswered.

NMT has however sighted an email from Fareed dated Friday, May 24, 2019 with regards the LLM and the use of the crest where he states:

Dear Rajen,

We can’t remain silent on this.

Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul Gafoor

Sent from my iPad

It is understood that “Rajen” refers to Rajen Devaraj, Chief Executive Officer of the Bar Council Secretariat in Kuala Lumpur.

The Bar has remained silent for nearly 2 months since.
Key person suddenly retired during extensive query

The College of Law used to be represented in Malaysia by its Director, Peter Tritt. Tritt have been queried extensively about the LLM and about the College’s business in Malaysia but has refused to provide answers. Tritt has been based in Kuala Lumpur since 2017 but announced on Friday that he had “retired” from the College on 30 June 2019.

It is understood that Tritt has forwarded queries sent him to his head office in Sydney and hence it appears that Tritt is under orders from his Chief Executive, Neville Carter, to remain silent.
Questionable advertising claims?

In advertising on the College’s website Carter has claimed that he had established a Professional Legal Training course for Malaysian Law students seeking admission to practise in Malaysia. There seems to be no evidence of such a course, or of any national level training course for the existing Certificate of Legal Practise.

Carter has also claimed to have produced the “inaugural” Handbook in Legal Practise for Malaysia, in the late 80s. A search of the main law libraries in Malaysia directed by the Chief Registrar, Federal Court Malaysia, has not found any such handbook.

He has also claimed to have, during that time to have identified and addressed “gaps” in Malaysian legal practise, but not even those in practice during that period and since have ever heard of him. Nor are senior practitioners aware of “gaps” that needed that to be addressed by external consultants.

As CEO of the College Carter has ultimate responsibility for the College’s Malaysian operation headed by Tritt and variously named the “College Of Law Asia Pacific” and the “College Of Law Asia”. A search by NMT has not revealed any entities registered under those names in Malaysia or in Australia, not even a foreign entities registered to conduct business in Malaysia.

Meanwhile the College, in collaboration with the Bar Council continues to sell its LLM and other courses in Malaysia, deriving a fee income from Malaysian courses.

-NMT

No comments:

Post a Comment