Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Mystery surrounding College Of Law Australia's leadership coincides with growing list of unanswered questions about the College 's misconduct in Malaysia, and CEO Neville Carter's abuse of of his power to issue Rule 19 certificates in an attempt to prevent any investigation into that misconduct

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 




Who leads The College of Law Australia ?



First this published  in  Lawyers' Weekly February 2024:
Angie Zandstra, the acting chief executive officer for the College of Law Australia, shared her insights on leadership in the legal profession and the significance of actively supporting and showing up for one’s staff members.


Then this , also in Lawyers' Weekly in  August 2024:

‘There seems to be greater enthusiasm and confidence’: Acting CEO of the College of Law on current law students

Ann-Maree David, the acting CEO of the College of Law, delineates the remarkable shift she is witnessing in law students’ mindsets, dynamics, and attitudes.

However Angie Zandstra still describes herself as CEO The College of Law Australia on her LinkedIn profile.


Meanwhile the The College of Law Australia website site still says:

Neville Carter AM
Chief Executive Officer and Principal, Executive Governor


This mystery is seen in context of the   matter of  CEO Neville Carter's attempt to demand that questions  raised  by this writer , as a journalist, about The College of Law Australia and his own  conduct in Malaysia be withdrawn. 

As previously reported, Carter attempted to do so in a letter to this writer ,who was then a student at the College Of Law,  demanding that questions about his conduct and that of the College in Malaysia (or questions that could be construed as threatening and intimidating ,as he put it ) be withdrawn  before he released this writer's PLT certificate of completion of The College of Law Australia's PLT course.

His letter was made public, and remains in the public domain ,but there is no indication that the matter has been disclosed in The College of Law Australia annual reports, and to its insurers given the implications for the College and its directors' operational and legal risks. The matter of the College's Malaysian scandal was made public in Malaysia in 2019.

TIO BE READ WITH 




Bar Council education ‘JV’ must be clarified

By  , in Scandal on July 19, 2019 . Tagged width:  ,  , 

KUALA LUMPUR, July 19 – The Malaysian Bar Council launched its first education venture, a LLM in Malaysian Legal Practise (LLM), last year in collaboration with the College Of Law Australia.

The LLM does not seem to have the approval of Malaysia’s Legal Professional Qualifying Board (LPQB) but the website for the course, which is hosted in Australia, prominently displays the Bar Council crest.

bar council

The crest has not been used before to promote a course of study, and queries put to Bar Council President Fareed Gafoor about the use of the crest have been acknowledged but remain unanswered.

NMT has however sighted an email from Fareed dated Friday, May 24, 2019 with regards the LLM and the use of the crest where he states:

Dear Rajen,

We can’t remain silent on this.

Abdul Fareed Bin Abdul Gafoor

Sent from my iPad

It is understood that “Rajen” refers to  Rajen Devaraj, Chief Executive Officer of the Bar Council Secretariat in Kuala Lumpur.

The Bar has remained silent for nearly 2 months since.

Key person suddenly retired during extensive query

The College of Law used to be represented in Malaysia by its Director, Peter Tritt. Tritt have been queried extensively about the LLM and about the College’s business in Malaysia but has refused to provide answers. Tritt has been based in Kuala Lumpur since 2017 but announced on Friday that he had “retired” from the College on 30 June 2019.

It is understood that Tritt has forwarded queries sent him to his head office in Sydney and hence it appears that Tritt is under orders from his Chief Executive, Neville Carter, to remain silent.

Questionable advertising claims?

In advertising on the College’s website Carter has claimed that he had established a Professional Legal Training course for Malaysian Law students seeking admission to practise in Malaysia. There seems to be no evidence of such a course, or of any national level training course for the existing Certificate of Legal Practise.

Carter has also claimed to have produced the “inaugural” Handbook in Legal Practise for Malaysia, in the late 80s. A search of the main law libraries in Malaysia directed by the Chief Registrar, Federal Court Malaysia, has not found any such handbook.

He has also claimed to have, during that time to have identified and addressed “gaps” in Malaysian legal practise, but not even those in practice during that period and since have ever heard of him. Nor are senior practitioners aware of  “gaps” that needed that to be addressed by external consultants.

As CEO of the College Carter  has ultimate responsibility for the College’s Malaysian operation headed by Tritt and variously named the “College Of Law Asia Pacific” and the “College Of Law Asia”. A search by NMT has not revealed any entities registered under those names in Malaysia or in Australia, not even a foreign entities registered to conduct business in Malaysia.

Meanwhile the College, in collaboration with the Bar Council continues to sell its LLM and other courses in Malaysia, deriving a fee income from Malaysian courses.

-NMT

No comments:

Post a Comment