HKEX listed CLP Group reported earnings remain in doubt-revenue reporting problems at wholly-owned subsidiary Energy Australia persist

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Revenue reporting problems at HKEX listed CLP Group's wholly-owned subsidiary Energy Australia persist.  A recent query to Energy Australia CEO Mark Collette  about metering in the May-July quarter 2021 has been responded to with the following: 

At your address, you have a manually read basic meter. Ultimately, the meter counts upwards and usage is calculated by taking away the prior meter reading from the current meter reading. This provides us with limited information on the electricity use at the address.

EA insists that there is nothing wrong with its metering and revenue recording systems.

To Be Read With

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

HKEX listed CLP Group reported earnings in doubt given revenue recording issues at wholly-owned subsidiary Energy Australia: Accounting issues add to problems created by EA's closure of its Wallerawang power station in Lithgow, NSW

by Ganesh Sahathevan










Sir Michael Kadoori's CLP owns Energy Australia

By accident rather than design this writer found himself  not once but twice a customer of  Sir Michael Kadoorie and his CLP Group's  Energy Australia Ltd (EA). EA is CLP's wholly-owned Australian subsidiary.

On both occasions the first being in 2008, the second in the recent past, over-billing was the issue. 

In 2008 EA laid blame on the meter reading contractor, on the second a query about over billing resulted in a credit being offered, and then explained away as, in fact, a likely under billing. The credit however remained, as a gesture of goodwill.

All this piqued the curiosity of this writer, given his many years of reporting on South East and East Asian companies, like CLP and so a query was sent first to EA's CEO Catherine Tanna. 

The query was simply this: how did EA account for under and over billing, and what provisions did it make for these issues. Ms Tanna  refused to provide an answer to that simple question. The same query was then sent CLP in Hong Komg,given the implications for CLP's consolidated reports but again, answers to the simple query was refused. 

What has been  received however are a number of emails from EA's PR department which have not addressed the accounting issues.

In light of the above, questions now arise as to the quality of the earnings reported in CLP's consolidated financial statements. published to the HKEX and shareholders. These issues add to the matter of the consequences for EA and CLP arising out of its closure of the Wallerawang power station in Lithgow, NSW (see story below).

TO BE READ WITJ

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Is EnergyAustralia's Wallerawang a case of a fraud on the electricity market: could Wallerawang be the basis of a class action against Energy Australia and its directors

by Ganesh Sahathevan

Sir Michael Kadoori's

CLP owns Energy Australia











This is an excerpt from a story sure to warm the cockles of any climate scientists' (and fellow travellers') heart:

EnergyAustralia's Wallerawang power station in Lithgow, NSW shut down in 2014, citing an oversupplied energy market. Even though recent reports point to energy supply issues in the market, there are no plans to re-open the site. EnergyAustralia plans to turn the power station into an "eco-industrial" park with industrial waste recycling business Bettergrow.

"We're really excited by the potential to transform Wallerawang into an industrial hub, as Bettergrow has done with disused mines and industrial sites in the past," EnergyAustralia's Mt Piper power station head, Greg McIntyre, said. "Handing over the keys is a complex transaction and we are all working hard to make it a reality.

"Everything we've done behind the scenes with deconstruction and salvaging work to get the old Wallerawang plant ready for new industry is beginning to pay off."

EnergyAustralia and Bettergrow are in discussions for the development of the site.

"Wallerawang has terrific potential as a 'green-spot' eco-industrial park that Lithgow and the broader region can benefit from financially," Bettergrow managing director Neil Schembri said. "For this to work, we will retain the majority of the plant's ... infrastructure ..."

Mr Schembri said the new industrial park could create between 200 and 300 jobs in the future.

(Cole Latimer, The Age,Film sets to art centres: life after dirty power1 June 2019)

However, as the first line suggests, the closure, " citing an oversupplied energy market" may have been premature; indeed given the state of the market today (just 5 years later) it might be argued that the closure was intended to cause an undersupply, in a market that was likely to experience growing demand.

If yes, then the question arises as to whether Energy Australia is liable for the losses caused by a fraud on the Australian energy market.

Since the Supreme Court of the United States inBasic Inc v Levinson 485 US 224 (1988), United States courts have embraced the ‘fraud on the market theory’ in relation to transaction causation, which essentially does away with the need for members of a class to prove actual reliance on the companies misleading representations on the basis that there is a presumption that an efficient market exists where share prices fluctuate according to publicly available information about the company. A defendant may rebut the presumption showing: „ that the market price of the shares was not influenced by the non-disclosure; the aggrieved investors would have purchased the shares at the same price notwithstanding the non-disclosure; and „ the aggrieved investors knew the information that was not disclosed.

The fraud on the market theory has not been accepted by Australian courts but this writer suggests that the position can easily change if and when a matter in which fraud on the market is pleaded comes before a judge who understands finance theory.

Additionally, while the theory has yet to be extended to electricity markets the fact that electricity markets have begun to draw the participation of hedge funds suggests that it is only a matter of time.

Meanwhile, there is nothing to say that litigants cannot launch a class action against Energy Australia for disrupting the electricity supply market by carefully working through the issue of causation.

END 

See also

'Fraud on the market' theory survives challenge in the US
By Ross Drinnan, Jenny Campbell 26 June 2014

Demand side participation in the National Electricity Market