by Ganesh Sahathevan
ASIO extends its deep condolences to the people of France. 4:37 PM · Oct 30, 2020
The jihadi activity in France over the past weeks which has included two beheadings has concerned ASIO to the point where ASIO has tweeted solidarity with the people of France (see tweet above from the ASIO Twitter account).
The beheadings remind us of the words of Supreme Court Judge Mr Justice Fagan in R v Bayda ; R v Namoa (No 8)
- Terrorists’ reliance on verses of the Quran to support an Islamic duty of religious violence has been seen with more or less clarity in a number of NSW and Victorian cases: see R v Khaja (No 5) [2018] NSWSC 238 at [72]- [78], [98], [101], [122]. The many Australian Muslims who wish to live in peace with the whole community may reflect that if Islam accepts the entire Quran as Allah’s eternal instruction to believers, without explicit repudiation of verses which ordain intolerance, violence and domination, that unqualified acceptance will embolden terrorists to think they are in common cause with all believers and indeed that they are the spearhead of the religion. The scriptural support for the terrorists’ perceived obligation of jihad cannot be rebutted by Australian courts or law enforcement authorities. If the verses upon which the terrorists rely are not binding commands of Allah, it is Muslims who would have to say so. If Australian followers of the religion, including those who profess deep knowledge, were to make a clear public disavowal of these verses, as not authoritative instructions from Allah, then the terrorists’ moral conviction might be weakened.
- The incitements to violence which terrorists quote from the Quran cannot just be ignored by the many believers who desire harmonious coexistence. Those verses are not ignored by terrorists. As seen in this and numerous other prosecutions, the hostile verses are inspiring serious crimes. In turn those crimes have the capacity to provoke social division and mistrus
As noted by this writer Fagan J's words remain a good description of The Quran's role in encouraging passive support for jihadi activities:
The Quran and passive support for jihadism explained by Fagan J in R v Bayda ; R v Namoa (No 8)
Also as reported, Fagan was unfortunately attacked by his own for having expressed the obvious.
TO BE READ WITH
Muslim Legal Network accused Sup Crt Judge Fagan of lacking fairness, failing to perform his role of administering justice impartially: Soon after his Chief Justice Tom Bathurst praised MLN for upholding the rule of law :" doing a good job, cannot see how you can do it better"
by Ganesh Sahathevan
The video excerpt above has been extracted from the Muslim Legal Network's Facebook page. While the 2019 Iftar Dinner was held in May, the video at this link was only uploaded in November:
If you missed out on attending our Ramadan Iftar Dinner earlier this year, dont miss out on this highlights ree
Chief Justice Tom Bathurst's words of praise for the MLN are intriguing given this attack on his bother Supreme Court judge, Desmond Fagan:
“We and various other organisations have made it clear that the comments by his Honour *Judge Desmond Fagan) were disappointing to say the least,” said Muslim Legal Network NSW president Sarah Khan. “The role of the judiciary is one of impartiality and fairness, and justice should be seen to be done.”
The position of the network that represents Australian Muslim legal practitioners is that Justice Fagan failed to perform his role of administering justice impartially, and rather, conflated crime and religion. And it warned this could lead to further Islamophobic attacks.
The context of the above statements is explained (in part) in the article below, bot that is not really relevant. In most jurisdictions that type of comment from lawyers would be considered a subversion of the judicial system.Lawyers can expect penalties to be imposed, by the courts and their respective professional bodies.
Not it seems in the eyes of Chief Justice Thomas Francis Bathurst, who has recently given a speech in which he expressed some difficulty in discerning community standards.
END
Chief Justice Tom Bathurst's words of praise for the MLN are intriguing given this attack on his bother Supreme Court judge, Desmond Fagan:
“We and various other organisations have made it clear that the comments by his Honour *Judge Desmond Fagan) were disappointing to say the least,” said Muslim Legal Network NSW president Sarah Khan. “The role of the judiciary is one of impartiality and fairness, and justice should be seen to be done.”
The position of the network that represents Australian Muslim legal practitioners is that Justice Fagan failed to perform his role of administering justice impartially, and rather, conflated crime and religion. And it warned this could lead to further Islamophobic attacks.
The context of the above statements is explained (in part) in the article below, bot that is not really relevant. In most jurisdictions that type of comment from lawyers would be considered a subversion of the judicial system.Lawyers can expect penalties to be imposed, by the courts and their respective professional bodies.
Not it seems in the eyes of Chief Justice Thomas Francis Bathurst, who has recently given a speech in which he expressed some difficulty in discerning community standards.
END
- BLOG
- SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CRITICISED FOR DIVISIVE REMARKS ABOUT ISLAM
Supreme Court Justice Criticised for Divisive Remarks About Islam
15/02/2019 BY PAUL GREGOIRE
E
Paul Gregoire is a Sydney-based journalist and writer. He has a focus on human rights issues, encroachments on civil liberties, drug law reform, gender diversity and First Nations rights. Prior to Sydney Criminal Lawyers®, he wrote for VICE and was the news editor at Sydney’s City Hub.
No comments:
Post a Comment