Monday, May 25, 2020

NSW AG and premier in waiting Mark Speakman is part of the problem of racism; his anti-racism campaign is part of a regime that considers blacks, browns, coloureds like house pets, who are expected to show servility in exchange for demonstrations of affection and protection.

by Ganesh Sahathevan


NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman/A screenshot of a poster from the state government's anti-racism campaign
NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman/A screenshot of a poster from the state government's anti-racism campaign Source: SBS News


The latest from the Attorney General Of NSW Mark Speakman, who is considered a potential premier of NSW in the near future: 


The New South Wales government has launched a public awareness campaign to help victims of racially-fuelled threats and abuse understand their legal rights.
The Stop Public Threats campaign, launched on Monday night, includes promotional posters bearing the slogan: "public threats against some of us, a problem for all of us".
NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman said he hoped it would encourage people to report threats of race-related violence to the police for investigation.
“A criminal law was introduced in 2018 in NSW. It makes it a criminal offence to threaten or incite violence on the basis of someone’s race, religion, gender sexuality,” he said.
“We need to work together to combat abusive and violent behaviour that discriminates against cultural or religious groups as well as other sections of our community.”
The problem for those of us that Speakman seeks to protect is this: in real terms protection is not available to any black or coloured who dares assert any right against Speakman and friends. Coloured Catholics for example, will not be heard. And any black or coloured who dares even think of questioning the regime that gives Speakman his power and privilege will be condemned.  Put in another way, Speakman and his ilk think of blacks and coloured as if they are household pets, who must remain obedient if they want to be protected. That protection is supposed to justify anything, including attempts to mislead Asian buyers of the Australian legal services.
END 

No comments:

Post a Comment