Sunday, April 26, 2020

Brendan Murphy has admitted that he became aware of significant human to human transmission of WUHAN-COVID by 20 Jan 2020- On 22 Feb 2020 Murphy insisted that Australians should not be concerned about community contagion; his main concern was xenophobia

by Ganesh Sahathevan




Chief Medical Officer Professor Brendan Murphy speaks during a press conference updating on the novel coronavirus at Parliament House in Canberra.
Chief Medical Officer Professor Brendan Murphy speaks during a press conference updating on the novel coronavirus at Parliament House in Canberra. Source: AAP


“We’re very concerned about xenophobia and any sort of racial profiling which is completely abhorrent,” he told reporters.

“There is no reason for people to be wearing masks, there is no reason for people to avoid anybody of any particular background or appearance.”


Brendan Murphy on 20 April 2020:

There was clear evidence coming from China that there was significant human to human transmission which was a game-changer. If you have a virus which does not spread from human to human, it is easy to contain but once you have human to human contamination it becomes risky.


A few weeks later Murphy's advice was to lockdown the whole country, due to fears of community contagion Unlike   the governments of Taiwan, Singapore and Japan, the Australian government refused to impose mandatory isolation on citizens and PRs returning from China. Even the ABC has had to admit that the Australian Government was slow to act.
TO BE READ WITH 

Monday, March 30, 2020


Revisiting Robert Gottliebsen's warning to Australian politicians and public servants in 2017 : Misleading the public is an offence , punishable with 12 months in jail. For application to the Wuhan Virus crisis see ABC 4 Corners "Pandemic"

by Ganesh Saahthevan



An excerpt from Robert Gottliebsen's column in THE AUSTRALIAN , published in March 2017, where he was writing about another (and ongoing) policy debacle: 


We are fortunate in Australia to have a section of the criminal code that covers politicians and public servants who make false statements or mislead the public. It sets out that if they are guilty of an offence they can be punished with 12 months jail. Every word uttered by ministers as they vandalised the network and created higher prices needs to be examined to determine whether an offence has been committed. It’s not my job to say they have committed an offence and, as is their right, the politicians will fight any prosecutions with great vigour.



As to what Australian politicians and public servants have not done to protect the health and wealth of Australians from the Wuhan Virus watch and read ABC Four Corners Pandemic:

Pandemic: The fight to contain coronavirus


TO BE READ WITH 

Stakes raised over gas ‘crime’The Australian
Robert Gottliebsen
30 March 2017
Former trade minister Andrew Robb has taken an unprecedented and important step towards bringing the politicians who vandalised our power and gas systems before the courts.
I emphasise that Robb did not describe as “criminals” the politicians who put NSW, Victoria and South Australia at risk of blackouts and forced hundreds of thousands of Australians to consider installing their own generators or batteries.
But at this week’s Food Forum Robb did describe what happened as a “crime”. I believe it is the first time a former Coalition minister has used the word “crime” to describe the destruction of low-cost energy.
He did not discuss blackout danger but, if anything, that is a greater “crime”.
I emphasise that Robb did not say politicians should be prosecuted, but now the “crime” word has been used, if we have power blackouts in NSW, Victoria, or South Australia over the next two summers an enraged community is going to demand that the perpetrators of the “crime” — the politicians — be hauled before the courts.
As I have described previously there is a 75 per cent risk of blackouts in NSW and Victoria. But it might not happen. The politicians could be lucky.
We are fortunate in Australia to have a section of the criminal code that covers politicians and public servants who make false statements or mislead the public. It sets out that if they are guilty of an offence they can be punished with 12 months jail. Every word uttered by ministers as they vandalised the network and created higher prices needs to be examined to determine whether an offence has been committed. It’s not my job to say they have committed an offence and, as is their right, the politicians will fight any prosecutions with great vigour.
The question for the courts to decide will be whether the community was told by the politicians that, to guarantee supply security, solar and wind installations required backup facilities and a reconfiguration of the power network, which the politicians did not undertake.
In addition, was the community told that blocking gas developments in NSW and Victoria would create supply dangers given Gladstone required southern gas. Prices of energy would have to rise.
Quite rightly, Senate crossbencher Nick Xenophon is refusing to allow tax cuts until the power and gas mess is sorted out. And he is right. Few local or overseas groups are going to make substantial new investments in Australia while power and gas prices are out of control, plus substantial gas shortages and blackouts are on the menu.
The federal government may need to declare a state of emergency and restore Hazelwood, given that a “crime” has been committed, as well as accelerating the Snowy plan and quickly taking other emergency measures.
Like Andrew Robb and my readers, I can’t help thinking about why our politicians made such fundamental and catastrophic errors. I have written about the need for advice outside the public service and the “yes” people among the ministerial advisers. But watch question time in state and federal parliaments and you will see politicians using too much of their time thinking up ways to abuse each other.
That time could be used to make sure we avoid blackouts.
Vast amounts of state and federal government resources are used to duplicate what the other is doing, and usually one bags the other so no decisions can be made. We need to synchronise power structures so states control some areas and Canberra others. When duplication is ended, not only do we save countless billions but real policy can be determined, rather than developing new weapons for the state/Commonwealth fights.
Paradoxically, it was Andrew Robb who in the lead-up to the 2013 Abbott election victory was shadow finance minister and set out detailed plans to save those billions by ending state-federal duplication.
But Tony Abbott made him trade minister, and since then the Coalition in government has set about increasing duplication and infighting, which takes state and federal politicians’ eyes off the ball and leads them to poor decision-making.
Maybe long blackouts and gas shortages are what the community needs to rewrite federation and change the way we make decisions. It is the most important issue in the nation.
The Australian
Posted by at 6:35 PM 

No comments:

Post a Comment