Saturday, July 21, 2018

NZ's Winston Peters ends China honeymoon over security concerns:Will he put right the Shewan Inquiry's 1MDB-China money laundering issues?

by Ganesh Sahathevan

First see :

Was the Shewan Inquiry compromised by John Shewan's China Construction Bank links-1MDB New Zealand links overlooked in deference to the PRC?



AND NOW,MAYBE HOPE OF SOME ACTION:

New Zealand ends China honeymoon over security concerns

New defense policy no longer calls Beijing an 'important strategic partner'
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi, right, meets New Zealand's Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters in Beijing on May 25.    © Reuters
WELLINGTON -- New Zealand's balancing of its relationships with China, its most important trading partner, and with traditional allies Australia and the U.S. has shifted toward the latter two, after the announcement of major new defense spending and a strategic report using uncharacteristically critical language about China.
The commentary on China in the Ministry of Defense's Strategic Policy Statement released July 6 is relatively mild and also includes positive references to the country's international role in the Asia-Pacific region. But it marks a departure from Wellington's previous stance of carefully avoiding causing any offense and no longer refers to Beijing as an "important strategic partner."
The more forthright tone from New Zealand can be partly attributed to increased pressure from Australia and the U.S., analysts said.
On July 9 Defense Minister Ron Mark announced that New Zealand would buy four Boeing P-8A Poseidon submarine-hunting maritime patrol aircraft for 2.35 billion NZ dollars ($1.6 billion). One of the key reasons Mark gave for the purchase was the aircraft's ability to operate in joint missions with allies such as Australia, the U.S. and Canada.
Acting Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has been signaling this year that New Zealand must respond to a rapidly changing regional security landscape.
"The Asia-Pacific region is much more contested. Great power rivalries have intensified ... Overall, there is less of a consensus on what the future of this region will look like and greater concern about the strain on the international rules-based order," he said in a recent speech.
The defense policy statement said China is deeply integrated into the rules-based global order but has not consistently adopted the governance and values of the order's traditional leaders. It noted Beijing had "adopted a liberalising economy absent liberal democracy."
New Zealand's Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters, center, and Defense Minister Ron Mark, left, announcing that the country has agreed to buy four Boeing maritime patrol planes from the U.S.   © AP
China's more confident assertion of its interests has raised tensions with neighboring countries and the U.S., and some of its actions challenge the existing world order.
"China has expanded its military and coastguard presence in disputed areas of maritime Asia. It has determined not to engage with an international tribunal ruling on the status of sovereignty claims," the statement said.
"Both domestically and as a basis for international engagement, China holds views on human rights and freedom of information that stand in contrast to those that prevail in New Zealand."
Peters confirmed Beijing had protested about the commentary through diplomatic channels. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a Beijing press conference on Monday her government had made "stern representations with New Zealand on the wrong remarks it has made on China."
"We urge New Zealand to view the relevant issue in an objective way, correct its wrong words and deeds and contribute more to the mutual trust and cooperation between our two countries," she said in reference to comments on the Chinese militarization of contested islands in the South China Sea.
Peters defended the change in tone in the statement, telling reporters this week that New Zealand was now willing to be more candid and honest, "rather than pulling all our punches and doing nothing about things we don't agree with."
The statement comes just six weeks after Peters visited China and announced a new round of negotiations to upgrade the two countries' free trade agreement. Since The FTA was signed in 2008, China has overtaken Australia as New Zealand's largest trading partner and annual exports to China have increased sixfold to NZ$12.2 billion.
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm TurnbullAustralian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government has introduced sweeping new laws aimed at preventing interference by foreign governments.    © AP
David Capie, the director of the Centre for Strategic Studies at Wellington's Victoria University, said there was a growing perception in Washington and Canberra -- rightly or wrongly -- that New Zealand was unwilling to confront growing Chinese political influence within the country.
"To address this, the defence policy statement is a clear tilt back towards traditional partners, notwithstanding some gentle criticism of Washington's decisions about TPP and the Paris Climate Change agreement," Capie said in a commentary.
The debate over political influence within New Zealand intensified last year with revelations that Jian Yang, a legislator in New Zealand's then-ruling center-right National Party, had taught English to Chinese spies before leaving China in the 1990s and becoming a New Zealand citizen in 2004. Yang denied having spied for China and remains in Parliament.
A report last year by Canterbury University political scientist Anne-Marie Brady also claimed Beijing had taken control of nearly all New Zealand's Chinese language media and was influencing the expatriate Chinese community in New Zealand through front organizations.
Similar allegations about Chinese interference in Australian politics led this month to the passage of sweeping new laws by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government aimed at preventing interference by foreign governments.
The growth in the economic relationship between New Zealand and China has also created domestic political tensions. Chinese buyers were partly blamed for the boom in Auckland housing prices, especially between 2014 and 2016, which has made housing unaffordable for many first-time buyers.
Chinese companies buying farm land and agricultural companies in recent years also became controversial, although China still accounts for only a relatively small proportion of total foreign investment in New Zealand.
The Labour Party-led coalition government, which came into power in October last year, has responded by announcing a proposed ban on housing purchases by non-resident foreigners and has also made rules for foreign investment in rural land more restrictive.
China's growing influence in the South Pacific, a region where New Zealand and Australia traditionally were the leading powers and aid donors, has come under renewed scrutiny. Without naming China, Peters has referred to growing competition and influence by non-traditional partners in the region, where Chinese-funded roads, buildings and other aid projects are an increasingly common sight.
New Zealand announced a large increase in aid to the South Pacific this year and with Australia is reportedly planning to sign a new security, aid and cooperation pact with South Pacific countries later this year.
Peters said China and New Zealand remain close but the government would in future be "upfront and speak plainly to our friends."

Anwar Ibrahim & the IIIT: The Children Also Rise........

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Anwar Ibrahim's children continue faithfully his IIIT work.From Washington to Florida (recall Sami Al-Arian et al). Daughter Nurul Izzah condemns RadioHead, while  som  Mod Ihsan does his thing out of New York.




END

Reference

JOHNS HOPKINS' SCHOOL OF ADVANCED TERROR
by Ilan Weinglass
   
Johns Hopkins University is demonstrating a disturbing pattern of awarding fellowships to Islamists with an avowedly anti-Western agenda. Mustafa El Khalfi, the Moroccan Islamist who was recently awarded a fellowship[1] at the university's School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), is not the first. In March of 2005, SAIS granted a visiting fellowship to Anwar Ibrahim, a terror-supporting Malaysian Islamist whose Virginia-based organization apparently committed tax fraud in his benefit.
On March 30, 2005, SAIS announced[2] that Ibrahim, the former deputy prime minister of Malaysia, was joining the university's Foreign Policy Institute, as a visiting scholar. Ibrahim was to "present seminars[3] on contemporary Southeast Asian politics, economic reform, Islam and democracy... [and] join in SAIS activities." The announcement by SAIS said that Ibrahim would also be working on "a project examining democratization in the Muslim world." While SAIS described him "as a strong advocate for civil society, economic liberalization, moderate Islam and democratic governance," publicly available evidence shows the opposite. A quick glance at his website[4] reveals a prominently featured photo of Ibrahim together with Yusuf Qaradawi, a leading Islamist scholar who is associated[5] with the Muslim Brotherhood and supports HAMAS, and who recently issued a fatwa calling for the Islamic conquest of Europe.[6]
Anwar Ibrahim is a founder[7] and director of the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT),[8] a think tank in Virginia that has alleged links to terrorism. IIIT's 2003 tax-exempt IRS filing[9] lists a $720 donation to the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation of Ashland, Oregon, which was designated[10] as a terrorist funding organization by the U.S. government in 2004. Among the Treasury Department's findings were that the Oregon branch of al-Haramain engaged in tax fraud, money laundering, supporting Chechen mujahideen affiliated with al Qaeda, and had "direct links between the U.S. branch and Usama bin Laden." In fact, many of al-Haramain's offices around the world were closed for supporting terrorism.
There is more evidence of IIIT's links to terrorism. A few examples: according to court documents[11], in the early 1990s IIIT donated at least $50,000 to a think tank run by Sami al-Arian, the World Islamic and Study Enterprise (WISE), that served as a front group for Palestinian Islamic Jihad. IIIT is also named as a defendant in two class-action lawsuits brought by victims of the 9/11 attacks. One alleges[12] that IIIT received the bulk of its operating expenses from the SAAR network,[13] whose component groups are accused in another class-action suit[14] of being "fronts for the sponsor of al Qaeda and international terror." The same suit lists IIIT as well as every officer of IIIT besides Anwar Ibrahim as a supporter of the SAAR network. This public information was available to SAIS, yet the school extended a fellowship to Ibrahim.
Ibrahim, along with three other IIIT directors, is also a trustee[15] of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). According to congressional testimony[16] of testimony of Jonathan Winer, former Deputy Secretary of State for International Law Enforcement, in October 2002 WAMY made Hamas leader Khalid Mishal an "honored guest" at a conference held in Riyadh. A Saudi opposition group reports[17] that WAMY disseminates literature encouraging "religious hatred and violence against Jews, Christians, Shi'a and Ashaari Muslims." Evidently, as a trustee of this group, Anwar Ibrahim is far from advocating moderate Islam.
Ibrahim and his family were also the beneficiaries of an apparent tax fraud perpetrated by IIIT. The same tax filings showing a donation to the al-Haramian foundation show $92,200 in contributions to Ibrahim's daughter, Nurul Izzah. IIIT violated U.S. law when it wrote "none" under "Donee's relationship" when listing donations to Ibrahim's daughter. The group would have lost its tax-exempt status had it been known that it was sending money to the family member of a director. Ibrahim never disavowed this act when given the chance and even stated explicitly[18] that these contributions were made for the education of his six children.
Moreover, the International Free Anwar Campaign (IFAC), which was established when Ibrahim was in a Malaysian prison, has some apparent links to al Qaeda. Rahim Ghouse,[19] who was an IFAC leader based out of Melbourne, Australia, had business dealings with Yassin al-Qadi, who is on the Treasury Department's list of Specially Designated Terrorists for funding al Qaeda. While this alone is not conclusive, it should have raised a red flag. Instead, SAIS assigned Ibrahim to "counsel students[20] who wish to learn more about Southeast Asia and the Muslim world."
Perhaps most importantly, Ibrahim never disavowed IIIT's support of terrorism. On the contrary: in an October 25, 2003 response[21] to the broadcasting of terror-supporting charges against IIIT on Australian television, he effusively praised the organization and said that charges against it were politically motivated.
SAIS also recently announced a fellowship, funded by W.W. Norton & Company, for students with the "firm intention to pursue a career that promotes international understanding between the United States and other countries and works toward the goal of preventing terrorism." In light of fellowships granted to Mustafa El Khalfi and Anwar Ibrahim, it seems that SAIS, is doing the exact opposite.
SAIS, however, recently lost Ibrahim to the newly renamed Prince Alwaleed bin Talal[22] Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, at Georgetown University, where he lectures "on several topics."[23] It is ironic that this trustee of WAMY, which supports HAMAS and has been implicated[24] in funding al Qaeda and other Islamist organizations, has been assigned to teach Georgetown students "modernity in Islam, [and] interfaith understanding."
Footnotes
1.  Olivier Guitta, "Johns Hopkins U's Islamist Fellowship," Front Page Magazine, December 21, 2005,
(www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=20599).
2. Felisa Neuringer Klubes, "Former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia Anwar Ibrahim Joins JHU SAIS as Visiting Scholar," March 30, 2005,
(www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/media_events/ Media_Advisories/MA2005/Ibrahim05.html).
3.  See [2.]
4.  http://www.anwaribrahim.com/ver2nd/enter.html
5.  "Hostage: how the Muslim world battled for the life of Norman Kember," The Guardian, December 11, 2005,
(www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1664682,00.html).
6.  Joel Leyden, "How Al-Qaeda Justifies Terrorism and Genocide," December 26, 2005,
(www.israelnewsagency.com/al-quaedaterrorismus10012.htm).
7.  Fareed Zakaria, "Anwar Ibrahim,"
(http://foreignexchange.tv/?q=node/736)
8.  "In Search Of Friends Among The Foes," Washington Post
(www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12823-2004Sep10_3.html).
9.  Guide Star Database of Non-Profit organizations,
(www.guidestar.org/pqShowGsReport.do?npoId=921171).
10.  Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Treasury, "U.S.-Based Branch of Al Haramain Foundation Linked to Terror Treasury Designates U.S. Branch, Director," JS-1895, September 9, 2004,
(www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/js1895.htm).
11.  Dep't of Justice website,
(www.usdoj.gov/usao/vae/ArchivePress/OctoberPDFArchive/03/ safaaffid102003.pdf).
12.  Find Law,
(http://news.corporate.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/ ashtonalq90302cmp.pdf).
13.  Douglas Farah and John Mintz, "U.S. Trails Va. Muslim Money, Ties," Washington Post, October 7, 2002,
(http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=inthenews502& Category=inthenews&Subcategory=0).
14.  Find Law, (http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/burnettba112202acmp.pdf).
15.  Dep't of Justice website,
(www.usdoj.gov/usao/vae/ArchivePress/%20SeptemberPDFArchive/ 03/biheirisupp091203.pdf).
16.  Find Law,
(http://www.mipt.org/pdf/s-hrg108-245.pdf).
17.  Ciaonet Org,
(www.ciaonet.org/pbei/winep/policy_2002/2002_673.html).
18.  "Response Of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim To The Attempt To Connect Him To The 'Al-Qaeda Terrorists," October 25, 2003,
(www.freeanwar.net/July2003/press_release261003.htm).
19. "Probe into Anwar terror claims," Sidney Morning Herald, October 25, 2003,
(www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/25/1066974373724.html).
20.  Felisa Neuringer Klubes, "Former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia Anwar Ibrahim Joins JHU SAIS As Visiting Scholar," SAIS, John Hopkins University,
(www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/media_events/Media_Advisories/ MA2005/Ibrahim05.html).
21.  "Response Of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim To The Attempt To Connect Him To The 'Al-Qaeda Terrorists," October 25, 2003,
(www.freeanwar.net/July2003/press_release261003.htm).
22.  Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, "Faculty,"
(http://explore.georgetown.edu/people/ai55/?PageTemplateID=75).
23.  Nora Boustany, "An Unlikely but Eager Voice Between Islam and the West," Washington Post, September 2, 2005,
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/ 2005/09/01/AR2005090102308.html.
24.  Ciao Org,
(http://www.ciaonet.org/pbei/winep/policy_2002/2002_673.html).

Ilan Weinglass is a fellow at the American Center for Democracy and a business intelligence analyst in the private sector. He graduated from SAIS in 2005.
This article appeared in Front Page Magazine (www.FrontPageMagazine.com), January 12, 2006.

Friday, July 20, 2018

Johor has a water shortage;Singapore wants a water deal with Johor : Mahathir should bless the "win-win"solution

by Ganesh Sahathevan









A dry Congok Dam in Mersing. Rainwater, which the dam relies on to replenish its reserves, is scarce thanks to the El Nino phenomenon. Pic by Mohd Azren Jamaludin



First, the brainwave  which seems to have been inspired 
by Singapore:



The crown prince of Johor, Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim, has said that water in the state belongs to the state government, and he prefers that the federal government not interfere on the issue, as it relates to the existing agreement with Singapore. 
Speaking in an exclusive interview with Channel NewsAsia on Thursday (Jul 19), he stressed that water is an issue over which the state has sovereignty, and that the Johor state government should decide on a “win-win” agreement with Singapore.
“At the end of the day, the water in Johor belongs to Johor. Water is state sovereignty. When it comes to religion, land and water, it belongs to the state. Therefore, I think it's the Johor state government (that) should decide. (I prefer) not to have federal interference when it comes to water between Johor and Singapore,” said Tunku Ismail.

Meanwhile, the reality is that Johor is running out of raw water that it can supply Singapore without harming its own supplies:



A GHASTLY sight greets those who are given permission to enter the Congok Dam in Mersing, Johor. Resembling anything but a dam, all one sees is cracked, parched earth dotted with pools of water barely there.
The water level at the dam was at 2.5m and 2.6m this past week — dangerously below the critical level of 3.5m, thanks to the drought caused by the El Nino phenomenon, which has hit Mersing for the past two years.
The drought affected the output at the Tenglu water treatment plant, which relies on raw water sourced from the Congok Dam. The dam relies solely on rainwater to replenish its reserves.
As a result, 40,000 people in Mersing are putting up with a fifth month of water rationing.
This comes in the wake of a four-month water rationing exercise that caused hardship to 600,000 people in Pasir Gudang, Masai and part of Johor Baru last year.
Another 66,000 people in Tanjung Surat, Pantai Timur and parts of Kota Tinggi had also experienced water rationing around the same time due to the low water levels recorded at two dams in the state.
In Mersing, traders, businesses and households are the most affected by the latest round of rationing, as their taps run dry for two days before supply is resumed for a 24-hour period.
Unfortunately, the “back on” supply in certain areas in Mersing was reduced to six hours recently, compounding the people’s hardship.
The situation is as grave as it gets. In an exclusive interview with the New Straits Times last Tuesday, Sultan of Johor Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar said the recorded rainfall this year was half of last year’s.
The ruler urged industries to use recycled water, and for state authorities to look into adopting Singapore’s water management model.
The city-state is known for its sustainable water management, including its NEWater (treated used water).
With Johor’s water reserves being susceptible to weather patterns, and because 99 per cent of the state’s raw water are sourced from surface water, new sources are needed to cope with the lower rainfall.
The Johor Water Regulatory Body (Bakaj), which is responsible for managing the state’s water resources, said it had been working to protect water catchment areas.
Bakaj director Mohd Riduan Md Ali said it spared no effort to ensure water reservoirs and their catchment areas were protected.
He said Bakaj, along with the state government and other water-linked agencies, such as the state water utility SAJ Holdings Sdn Bhd, were in talks to find new water sources, including a proposal by the state government to tap underground water via tube wells.
“The state government will make the announcement on the likely location for the tube wells,” Riduan told the New Sunday Times.
He said Bakaj had been proactive in acting against those who disrupted Johor’s water supply system, including through agriculture or industrial activities that encroached into water catchment areas.
Under the Johor Water Enactment 1921, those found guilty of causing blockage or interference to the water supply system related to any dam can be fined up to RM500,000.
Riduan said anyone who wished to set up farms or industries near water catchment areas needed to get a licence from Bakaj.
He said Bakaj had fenced water catchment areas to prevent encroachment since last year.
“We began with the Upper Layang Dam in Masai where we partially fenced the 2,575ha water catchment area. The second phase involving 13km of fencing in the same area will begin by end of the year.”
He said fencing would first be done around critical dams in the state before it was expanded to other catchment areas.
“We have partially fenced the Sungai Pulai water catchment area and this has prevented encroachment.”
Riduan said Bakaj was moving to gazette all water catchment areas under its jurisdiction to further protect them.
“There were cases where the boundary of agriculture land breached the boundary of the water catchment areas.
“With the fencing and the creation of buffer zones between agricultural land and catchment areas, as well as regular checks, we have controlled the situation.”




SEE ALSO 
Taps in 1.8 million south Johor households run dry

Mahathir should bless this union ,between a state bound by national boundaries,and a city state which has no choice but to remind Malaysia that the water agreement is at the basis for Singapore's very existence as an independent sovereign state."

END


















Friday, July 13, 2018

Is the Vincent Tan Raya photo-op getting in the way of arresting Jho Low: Interrogating Robin Tan can provide significant intel

by Ganesh Sahathevan

While Malaysian authorities continue to trail Jho Low (in every sense of the word) obvious targets of any proper investigation are being ignored. Case in point: Robin Tan, who if properly interrogated, is likely to provide significant intelligence that can lead to the arrest of Who Low, his accomplices
,and to all the assets purchased with stolen 1MDB money.


by Ganesh Sahathevan 


Here is  Vincent Tan making a " grand entrance at Dr Mahathir's open house";












It must not be allowed to get in the way of this  vital 1MDB investigation:




Tuesday, May 9, 2017


Najib & Rosmah conducted 1MDB business on their own :Why not seize the assets of Low Hock Peng,Vincent  Tan ,and Bustari Yusof who were also present ?


by Ganesh Sahathevan


Image result for larry low hock peng

Larry Low Hock Peng 


Image result for bustari yusof vincent tan





Cardiff City owner Vincent Tan

The IPIC "settlement" seems shaky,and the China "rescue" seems to have fallen apart.
A realistic avenue for the recovery of Malaysian taxpayers' money lost in the 1MDB debacle is needed, and while the US DOJ has an action to do so in play, Malaysians really ought to be helping themselves.

One possible solution may be the seizure of all and any assets held by Low Hock Peng (head of the Low Family,and father of Jho) ,Vincent Tan( head of the Berjaya Group of companies,  father of Robin  Tan) and Datuk Bustari Yusof of Sarawak.

As reported previously on this blog and by Sarawak Report, PM Najib and wife Rosmah illegally conducted 1MDB business with PetroSaudi on their own.It was also reported that those present during those dealings included  Jho Low, Robin Tan,and Bustari Yusof. Arguing that Jho and Robin's presence had nothing to do with their families' business interests would be akin to splitting what  hairs one might find on  Arul Kanda's head, which seems to be in danger of being axed.

It is more likely than not that all three were parties to the business that was conducted,despite not having anything to do with 1MDB.
It follows then that the assets of all three, who represent their families, could be seized as a means of recovering what has been lost from 1MDB.

There are likely to be a number of legal means that might be relied on for the purpose, but Vincent Tan and family,  and Bustari Yusof both are recipients of very lucrative government concessions that may be withdrawn at any time. These could be seized, placed in some form of public trust, and the proceeds used to recoup the 1MDB losses.
As with regards Larry Low Hock Peng and family, is it not time to drop the pretence that they are  "old money" philanthropists? The same may be said of PM Najib, whose own brothers rejected his claim of "legacy family assets".





END





by Ganesh Sahathevan 





























The photo above obtained by Sarawak Report shows PM Najib, wife Rosmah and Petrosaudi's Prince Turki Abdullah and Tarek Obeid in discussion, on board a yacht somewhere off the coast of the south of France.








Clearly visible in the photo are three sets of documents,which appear to be some form of prospectus (using that term in its broadest sense). Interestingly, Rosmah Mansor has her own copy. Obviously, this was no friendly holiday chat over drinks while taking in the sea breeze; detailed business matters were being discussed.


In its own words, PetroSaudi's business dealings in Malaysia have been with 1MDB,and hence it is hard to see that the above discussion did not concern 1MDB. 

The implications for Najib are obvious. To begin with the photo belies the(in any case idiotic) claim made by his  lawyer that his  "signature on 1MDB documents (is)a formality, doesn’t mean he decides or knows all." Consequently this photo adds to the existing evidence that puts him at the very centre of the 1MDB theft. 

Then , the apparent involvement of Rosmah in 1MDB's affairs does seem to confirm the allegations regarding  her, and her son Riza's dealings in 1MDB's cash assets.It is hard to see how Najib , or Rosmah can justify her being involved in discussions concerning 1MDB.
END 









"Innocent Owner" Riza Aziz Attended Yacht Meeting Before Good Star Heist - EXCLUSIVE

"Innocent Owner" Riza Aziz 

Attended Yacht Meeting Before 

Good Star Heist - EXCLUSIVE

Last week in California the Prime Minister’s step-son, Riza Aziz, filed a notice to
 dismiss the US Department of Justice’s seizure of his properties on the grounds that
 he was the “innocent owner” and could not be held responsible for the fact the money was stolen from 1MDB.
Motion to dismiss by Riza's lawyers
Motion to dismiss by Riza’s lawyers
Those properties include a Beverly Hills mansion, the film production company Red Granite’s future earnings from Wolf of Wall Street, a London Belgravia town house and a New York penthouse.
What this defence contends is that Riza had simply no idea that the hundreds of millions that suddenly started coming his way was not stolen, but thought it was a gift. For this reason he reckons he should be allowed to hang on to all the items bought with Malaysia’s stolen development money (money which the Malaysian tax payer is now faced with paying back to the original lenders at high interest rates).
Yet Sarawak Report has established new evidence that Riza was in from the very start on the 1MDB heist, in that he was invited to attend the meeting where the first ‘joint venture’ was cooked up between Jho Low, the Prime Minister and company PetroSaudi on the super-yacht Tatoosh in August 2009.
A trip manifest reveals that the jaunt, which took place between 15-20th August, was organised by a “high-end boutique concierge company” named Baroque, of which Jho Low was a member. According to the note made by the representative for Baroque, Sahle Ghebreyesus, the trip was in fact commissioned by his client Jho Low (whom he describes on the manifest as “my guy”). In March the following year Tarek Obaid also joined Baroque, which is an agency designed to pamper the super-rich:
high-end
High-end boutique concierge company that organised the rental of Tatoosh
Photographs later obtained by Sarawak Report show the main players behind the theft of the first billion from 1MDB through the PetroSaudi ‘joint venture’, which was strategised during this super-yacht meeting.
However, we can now confirm that Riza Aziz also joined the party, along with Najib’s key financial cronies Bustari Yusof and Robin Tan.  Robin Tan is the son of Vincent Tan, long associated with BN political funding, and Bustari is the Sarawak PPB party treasurer cum billionaire, who was handed the ‘turnkey contract’ for the Pan Borneo Highway project and whose brother Fadillah has now been appointed Minister for Public Works.
This gives the Bustari brothers control over all the big contracts handed out by the Government, in Malaysia’s notoriously corrupted procurement process and Bustari has rarely strayed from Najib’s side in recent months.
'My guy" Jho Low fixed the trip. "innocent owner" Riza Aziz was also on board
‘My guy” Jho Low fixed the trip. “innocent owner” Riza Aziz was also on board
Did Riza have simply no idea what was going on as these guys did the business which was soon to send money streaming his way?
It was just a few short months later that he went on to launch his production company Red Granite Pictures at the most lavish launch party ever seen at the Cannes Film Festival in 2010.
And over the next two years Jho Low was at Riza’s side at every major film event involving Red Granite Pictures, including Wolf of Wall Street, which was funded by yet more money stolen from 1MDB, thanks to the later ‘Power Purchase Loan’ manoeuvres also organised by Jho Low.
According to the New York Times, Low was furthermore directly involved in the purchase of both of Riza’s US properties in Hollywood and New York. Did Riza simply fail to realise what was going on?
There can only be two conclusions. Either Riza is lying and he did know or Riza is a sad and stupid creature, who was merely used as a front and proxy by the players behind the scandal, which included his friend Jho Low and step-dad Najib.
He is therefore EITHER innocent OR the owner.  He cannot be the “innocent owner”!
left to right - Tarek Obaid, Prince Turki and Najib Razak - the three named Shareholders of the 1MDB PetroSaudi Joint Venture meeting a month before the deal on the yacht Tatoosh.
left to right – Tarek Obaid, Prince Turki and Najib Razak – the three named Shareholders of the 1MDB PetroSaudi Joint Venture meeting a month before the deal on the yacht Tatoosh.
Sarawak Report requests that various journalists, authors and film
 makers, who seek to use this site as their resource for commercial 
projects such as books and documentaries give full credit to this blog, acknowledge copyright and do not seek to apply for awards, 
commissions etc without so doing.