Sunday, May 14, 2017

Dalian Wanda invests under direction from the Chinese Government-Australian FIRB approvals for Circular Quay,other projects in Australia ought to be revoked, at minimum suspended pending review

by Ganesh Sahathevan 



Business talk: Najib meeting with Wang in Beijing. — Bernama



Malaysia's PM Najib Razak, said in Beijing that he would like China's Dalian Wanda Dalian property group  to develop a prime plot of land in Kuala Lumpur, but understood that Wanda's participation in the project would require Chinese Government approval.
The Star reported:
On whether the Chinese government would endorse Dalian Wanda Group’s investment in Bandar Malaysia, Najib said: “We will refer to the Chinese government based on the final settlement since it requires their support.”

While it is true that Najib's management of the project is 
confused to say the least,  his statement above was made in Beijing and in the presence of Wang Jianlin,China's richest man who is supposed to own a significan part and control Dalian Wanda.

Wang  did not correct of object to what Najib had to say,and therefore Wanda's claim to be a non-government entity is in doubt.That claim is the basis for it obtaining Australian Government  approval for projects in Australia,and those approvals must now be revoked or at minimum suspended pending review.

END 






Dalian Wanda reaches for the cloud in Circular Quay project



Dalian Wanda is hoping to complete its $1bn twin tower project at Circular Quay in 2021.
Dalian Wanda is hoping to complete its $1bn twin tower project at Circular Quay in 2021.


Dalian Wanda is hoping to complete its $1bn twin tower project at Circular Quay in 2021.
Dalian Wanda is hoping to complete its $1bn twin tower project at Circular Quay in 2021.

Chinese powerhouse Dalian Wanda will adopt cloud technology in its proposed luxury hotel on Sydney’s Circular Quay with the ambitious developer hoping to roll out the system in more overseas projects.
The company, controlled by billionaire Wang Jianlin, has just lodged the stage two development application for the 110-metre five-star hotel tower, the final move in winning approval for the $1 billion twin tower project known as Wanda One Sydney.
The proposed redevelopment, also comprising a 194 metre, 59-storey luxury apartment tower, had gone through the most complicated development approval process the City of Sydney had ever handled, John Wei, managing director of Wanda One Sydney, told The Australian.
“This has to be an iconic project, given its location at Circular Quay,” he said.
“Wanda’s vision is to create a benchmark for luxury hotels and luxury apartments in overseas markets, which we can refer back to in future projects.”
The hotel, to be called Wanda Vista, is the company’s first hotel project in Sydney. The company has appointed international ­architect Kengo Kuma & Associates and Australian firm Crone Architects to lead the design.
Wanda will apply its “Wanda Cloud” technology in the hotel — the first time it has done so outside of China.
“For example, before you get back to your hotel room, you can use the app on your phone to control the settings in your room to make sure you have what you want already for you,” he said.
“You can have the air conditioning set at the right degree, the exact TV channel you want, the most comfortable water temperature for your bath, and even the window, the ventilation, etc, all before you get back,” Mr Wei said.
The Beijing-based company proposed the dual tower project on the prominent harbourfront site at 1 Alfred Street after buying the office building for $415m from Blackstone in late 2014 and later parcelling it with two smaller properties — Fairfax House at 19-31 Pitt Street and the Rugby Club at 31a Pitt Street. With most approvals in place, it now expects to start demolition work on the site early next year and to complete the project by 2021.
Wanda is also planning to launch the 59-storey residential tower in the third quarter or the fourth quarter of 2017, which will comprise up to 200 luxury apartments. “In comparison with other overseas markets, Australia still has great potential in residential development, especially in the high-end market,” Mr Wei said.
“We are taking an at least 10-year view here, and our client base won’t be impacted by short-term fluctuations.”








Saturday, May 13, 2017

Not in Israel's interest to frustrate the 1MDB investigation, and the recovery of funds that will be used against Israel

by Ganesh Sahathevan


The investigate news site Sarawak Report has reported that Israeli intelligence assets have been used against it in an attempt to prevent publication of material concerning the billion dollar 1MDB theft.According to Sarawak Report:

It is plain that someone acting for (Khadem al Qubaisi , one of the figures at the centre of the 1MDB scandal) then turned to (one Frederic Lassagne) and then (Bernard Squarcini a former head of the French secret service ,DCRI). Exactly what role these private companies linked to Squarcini  played in the various operations against Sarawak Report and its sources however remains unclear.

We only know that they called for surveillance and support from Israeli, Palestinian and Algerian secret service and former secret service contacts, in what Squarcini described as a “multi-faceted operation” in which “intermediaries” were added to the estimated costs by Squarcini.



Generally, Malaysia considers Israel an enemy nation, refusing to let even sports teams from Israel to compete in the country. It would be very careless for any Israeli , let alone members and former members of the intelligence community to frustrate attempts to recover the stolen billions and put away those responsible. In fact, it is in the interest of Israelis to ensure that these  efforts succeed.

END

Reference


How Reputation Squads - And Hit Squads - Targeted Sarawak Report

How Reputation Squads - And Hit Squads - Targeted Sarawak Report

In June 2015 a person accused of passing information to Sarawak Report about IPIC’s former boss Khadem Al Qubaisi claims he was the subject of an attempted carjack in central Paris.
I am certain they were planning to silence me” he has told a third party.
Just a few weeks previously Khadem al Qubaisi (KAQ), one of the figures at the centre of the 1MDB scandal, had been sacked by the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund following the publication by Sarawak Report of the details of multi-million dollar payments made to him by Jho Low’s company Good Star Limited.  Good Star had received over a billion dollars channelled out of 1MDB.
We had also published photographs of Al Qubaisi behaving in a manner which was in conflict with his public position, in a French nightclub and elsewhere.
The dramatic incident in Paris has been substantiated by separate French sources, who have told Sarawak Report they learned of a ‘hit’ taken out with a European gang against people alleged to be informants.

The Squarcini leaks

Separately, a recent release of leaked emails has revealed further French-based operations against Sarawak Report.  Included was an Anglo-French company called Reputation Squad, which was hired to monitor Sarawak Report (and all online Tweets and comments relating to Sarawak Report) during the first half of 2015, in a move that was described as being part of a far wider operation.
Bernard Squarcini - ex secret service chief
Bernard Squarcini – ex secret service chief
The information comes from a data dump that has been causing consternation in France, known as the Squarcini leaks. Bernard Squarcini was a former head of the French secret service (DCRI) appointed by Nicolas Sarkozy.
He was widely considered to be very close to the ex-President and Hollande later dismissed him on the grounds he had “deep political ties” with the former leadership.
In the emails Squarcini makes regular reference to “tonton”, meaning uncle, by whom many assume he means his former political boss.
After leaving his post Squarcini set himself up as a private consultant under a company named Kyrnos, apparently trading off his extensive intelligence contacts and capabilities.
He worked with and later became the head of the Paris office of ARCANUM, a major intelligence firm based in the United States and employing several ex-secret service people like himself.
Last year an investigation opened into Squarcini, based on complaints related to Squarcini’s alleged work on behalf of clients such as Kazakhstan and the French billionaire Bernard Arnault, who is accused of hiring him to monitor the Hermes family prior to his takeover of their company.
In the midst of these wrangles, it appears that somebody has released emails between Squarcini and colleagues…. and lo and behold his involvement also in a job taken out against Sarawak Report in April 2015 has come to light.  The job related to our reports on KAQ and 1MDB:
Squarcini forwarded background on KAQ's 'problem' to a colleague April 15th 2015
Squarcini forwarded background on KAQ’s ‘problem’ to a colleague April 15th 2015
The email above goes on to provide further information about KAQ and the people allegedly presenting him problems “XX has been blackmailing KAQ by telling him if he does not receive xx million USD from him he will leak all sorts of information including pictures and banking documents…”   The email then ends with a reference to Sarawak Report:
Information appeared in Sarawak Report says the email..
Information appeared in Sarawak Report says the email..

The KAQ Connection

Khadem Al Qubaisi (KAQ), now jailed in Abu Dhabi, has very extensive interests and properties in France and was known to be a contact of Nikolas Sarkozy. In fact, the former President had incurred criticism that February 2015 from party officials for taking time out of his presidential re-election campaign (which failed) to fly to Abu Dhabi to give a paid speech for IPIC.
KAQ was said to be close to Sarkozy - February 2015 he went on a speaking tour to Abu Dhabi
KAQ was said to be close to Sarkozy – February 2015 he went on a speaking tour to Abu Dhabi
The email was part of a trail that began with a certain Frederic Lassagne, who sent a message entitled URGENT to Squarcini on 15th April outlining the situation in hand.  Frederic Lassagne, was a former Special Advisor to Eric Besson, who had been Nicolas Sarkozy’s Industry Minister in government.
Emailer - former advisor to Sarkozy minister Eric Besson
Emailer – former advisor to Sarkozy minister Eric Besson
Eric Besson was soon to take up an appointment (in June 2015) to the Board of CEPSA, the Spanish oil giant recently acquired by IPIC, of which Khadem had been CEO. By January of the following year however, after the 1MDB had become a global scandal and KAQ had been dismissed, Besson stepped down again from the post.
Lassagne’s email first detailed KAQ’s position and importance and then moved on to his issue with the material published by Sarawak Report.
He cites a claim on KAQ’s behalf that the information was released to Sarawak Report by ‘blackmailers’, a similar standard pejorative to the accusation against the PetroSaudi whistleblower Xavier Justo.
That note from Frederic Lassagne was the same day forwarded by Squarcini to his associate at the private investigations company ARCANUM named Julien Cariou von Saint-George, accompanied by some rather sinister comments in French. These comments imply that Squarcini was coordinating an operation on the matter with the ex-head of Mossad, along with Algerian secret services and a Palestinian former Fatah intelligence chief:
Need to make sure uncle is OK - ex-Mossad head and Algerian Secret Service on board....
Need to make sure uncle is OK – ex-Mossad head and Algerian Secret Service on board….
“Good day Julien – here is the context in which XXX XXX was forced to re-locate to Tel Aviv, where we will watch him for now before going to see him  This blackmailer is still active, meanwhile his colleague is under surveillance of the Algerian SR [secret service] and he is prohibited from leaving the territory, although he is unaware of that.
So we must tell our friend Dagan [ex-Head of Mossad, now working with ARCANUM] if ‘tonton’ [Uncle] is OK with it.
Thank you for telling me the estimate to which I am going to add the intermediaries who have informed Arcanum France, the dossier being multi-faceted.
The person with whom you can get in touch to confirm the referral and guidiance is on US telephone number …….
He knows ARCANUM…”
Later emails in the dump produce a reply from Julien on this matter. He checks if the number given was for KAQ himself:
“Bernard
Thank you for your message. I have received the information. KAQ’s direct number is it the one you sent me earlier? Thanks for letting me know in advance.
Squarcini replies telling him “KAQ is ready to be on the phone at any time today.”  Squarcini also informs ARCANUM’s Julien Cariou von Saint-George that KAQ’s neighbour the Palestinian, Mohammed Dahlan is in a position to get information from Israel.
Dahlan has been identified by the French publiction Intelligence Online, which has also covered this leak, as the former Fatah intelligence chief in Gaza, who later became special operations advisor to Abu Dhabi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Zayed.

Operation Reputation

KAQ had come a cropper in March following publication by Sarawak Report of information that he had received $20 million of 1MDB’s money through the company Good Star Limited, owned by Jho Low, into his private account.
Later Sarawak Report was able to demonstrate that the total kickbacks received by KAQ totalled no less than half a billion dollars. It was all money from 1MDB and KAQ was directly involved in the later stages of thefts from the fund.
KAQ, who had been ealier described as one of the most powerful operators in the Middle East and Arab Businessman Of The Year was sacked and later arrested.  It would appear he blamed Sarawak Report.
On March 23rd 2015 (three weeks before the Squarcini emails) our site experienced a sly and secretive hacking attack, by which highly professional operators entered our systems and surgically removed the story on KAQ. The illegal hackers also switched off the Google settings on our site, in order to make us no longer easily available to searchers for Sarawak Report.
It was some days before readers alerted us, after which we replaced the hacked article and strengthened our systems.
Ex-Minister Eric Besson, ally of Sarkozy, ex-boss of Lassagne, briefly on CEPSA board
Ex-Minister Eric Besson, ally of Sarkozy, ex-boss of Lassagne, briefly on CEPSA board
It is plain that someone acting for Khadem then turned to Lassagne and then Squarcini.  Exactly what role these private companies linked to Squarcini played in the various operations against Sarawak Report and its sources however remains unclear.
We only know that they called for surveillance and support from Israeli, Palestinian and Algerian secret service and former secret service contacts, in what Squarcini described as a “multi-faceted operation” in which “intermediaries” were added to the estimated costs by Squarcini.
Later emails from Squarcini to Julien Cariou von Saint-George again forward a “monitoring report” sent in May 2015 by Alberic Guigou, the French chief of a company based in Paris and London called Reputation Squad:
Monitoring report on Sarawak Report's articles referring to KAQ
Monitoring report on Sarawak Report’s articles referring to KAQ
This was after we had replaced the previously hacked article on Khadem Al Qubaisi’s links to Jho Low and 1MDB. Reputation Squad had been apparently monitoring a number of our later articles on KAQ.  In particular, they were reporting on who was reproducing them, who was tweeting  and commenting on them and whether the comments were favourable or negative.
“We have detected 21 mentions over the past three days :
* 5 articles, of which four are negative
* 16 tweets, of which thirteen are negativeThe articles displayed one of the problematic photograph and added new accusations. They have been retweeted by non-influential users.
reported Guigou.
Reputation Squad boasts special and  “augmented skills” to clients. We contacted M Guigou to ask if he could discuss his activitiies with regard to Sarawak Report on behalf of M Squarcini ?
An Augmented agency that advertises 'Augmented Solutions"
An Augmented agency that advertises ‘Augmented Solutions”
M Guigou has admantly denied that his agency was involved in any further activity against  Sarawak Report beyond monitoring:
“…we provide strategic communications advice and services to help our clients manage overall positioning and image. As you can easily see on our website, among the services we provide in our Paris and London offices, we monitor the web and social media, such service being very common as you may know – you may use such monitoring services yourself….  on the matter you mention, we provided our client with monitoring reports covering all online mentions. We neither proceeded to any hacking-related activity of any sort at any time of our history, nor will ever. Besides my company has been a victim, just like you, of malicious acts”
Over the following weeks, in June of 2015, the editor of Sarawak Report was separately subject to stalking and surveillance in London and later in the year one of our sources reported a further attempt against him, this time outside France.
The Squarcini papers have therefore provided what appears to be a partial snapshot of what the ex-secret service boss himself described as a multi-faceted operation launched against the various whistleblowers into 1MDB in 2015.
Our shocked informants have placed all their evidence on these alleged attempts against them in the hands of the responsible authorities.


Friday, May 12, 2017

PM Najib's RM 1.125 Billion in HK accounts not a false allegation-Malaysia's AG Apandi has conceded as much, and may have admitted an 1MDB connection

by Ganesh Sahathevan 






Malaysia's Attorney General Mohamad Apandi Ali has withdrawn all charges of economic sabotage against UMNO whistle-blower Khairuddin Hassan and his lawyer Matthias Chang.Both have consequently been acquitted of charges laid in October 2015.


It was alleged then that they had attempted to sabotage Malaysia's banking and financial system by lodging reports concerning the theft from 1MDB in five different jurisdictions: France, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Hong Kong and Singapore.


The Hong Kong report included details of some RM 1.125 Billion held in HK bank accounts, ultimately controlled by PM Najib Razak.





The fact that Apandi has now withdrawn all charges suggests that he concedes the allegations concerning Najib's billions in Hong Kong are not baseless. Apandi is a government man, and party man, so it does seem as if the Malaysian Government and the ruling UMNO are in agreement.
By extension, he also concedes that the monies in Najib's accounts have come out of 1MDB.



END







PM Najib's RM 1.125 Billion in HK & Tan Sri Larry Low ,faher of Jho 

by Ganesh Sahathevan

Overlooked in this week's reporting is this revelation ,with regards a  report lodged with Hong Kong Police by UMNO whistle-blower Khairuddin Hassan:


Four other companies are also suspect, added Khairuddin, because Najib is a signatory here and the accounts of the companies show that a total of RM1.125 billion has been kept at the Hong Kong branch of Credit Suisse. “I have requested the Hong Kong police to conduct comprehensive and detailed investigations on the financial sources of the companies concerned and their transactions.”
“I requested the authorities concerned to investigate Alliance Assets International Ltd; Cityfield Enterprises Ltd; Bartingale International Ltd; Wonder Quest Investments Ltd. All these companies have Najib as the signatory.

Khairuddin, at the same time, also lodged another set of police reports on Jynwell Capital (HK); Jynwell Charitable Foundation; and Strategic Resources (Global Ltd), all owned by Jho Low and family.


It has been established that the report included this document,which suggests that monies were transferred from Najib's AMislamic Bank and Singapore   accounts to accounts at Credit Suisse's branch in Hong Kong:


 The report against Larry Low concerns the Low family's takeover of Coastal Energy , a company formerly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.It has been alleged that the takeover was funded in part with funds from 1 MDB.The report points the finger at Tan Sri Larry Low as the mastermind of his son Jho Low's adventures. The reports taken together suggest  a base of operations  in Hong Kong.
END





ATTORNEY GENERAL MEDIA STATEMENT
Charges Against Khairuddin Abu Hassan and Matthias Chang

On Monday, 12 October 2015, Khairuddin Abu Hassan and his lawyer, Matthias Chang were charged under section 124L of the Penal Code, read with Section 34 of the Penal Code for attempting to sabotage Malaysia’s banking and financial systems.

The action has been questioned by certain parties, including in the article published in the Star on 12 October 2015, titled ‘Dr M, Ku Li team up to slam Sosma detention of 1MDB critics,’ as being an abuse of the government powers.

The Attorney General’s Chambers clarifies that both Khairuddin Abu Hassan and his lawyer, Matthias Chang are charged under section 124L of the Penal Code and not the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA).

The Attorney General’s Chambers further clarifies that the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA) is a procedural law that provides special measures to facilitate the investigation and prosecution ‘security offences”. The definition of ‘security offences’ makes it clear that the SOSMA is not limited to terrorism or terrorists.

The ‘security offences’ to which the Act applies are those listed in the First Schedule to the SOSMA. When SOSMA was enacted, the listed ‘security offences’ were offences under Chapter VII of the Penal Code (Offences against the State) and Chapter VIA of the Penal Code (Offences related to terrorism).

In 2014, the list was extended to include Chapter VIB of the Penal Code (Organised Crime) as well as offences under Part IIIA of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007. The list was further extended in June 2015 to include the Special Measures Against Terrorism in Foreign Countries Act 2015.

Section 124L, of the Penal Code is an offence under Chapter VI of the Penal Code. It was one of seven new offences introduced into Chapter VI of the Penal Code in 2012 through Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2012. It is therefore a ‘security offence’ to which SOSMA applies.

The seven new offences are namely:

Activities detrimental to parliamentary democracy (section 124B)
Attempt to commit activity detrimental to parliamentary democracy (section 124C)
Dissemination of information (section 124H)
Sabotage (section 124K)
Attempt to commit sabotage (section 124L)
Espionage (section 124M)
Attempt to commit espionage (section 124N)
These offences were in addition to the reenactment with modifications of certain offences which used to be in the Internal Security Act 1960, namely the new sections 124D, 124E, 124F, 124G, 124L and 124J. The above explanation can be seen in the Explanatory Statement to the Penal Code (Amendment) Bill 2012.

Section 124L, of the Penal Code provides that ‘Whoever attempts t commit sabotage or does any act preparatory thereto shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which extend to fifteen years.’

In this regard, section 130A of the Penal Code defines the term ‘sabotage’ to mean an act or omission intending to cause harm, among others, to the maintenance of ‘essential services’ while the term ‘essential services’ is defined to include banking and financial services.

The Attorney General’s Chambers provides this clarification on the provisions of law that have been applied in the case of Khairuddin Abu Hassan and Matthias Chang to prevent any further misleading statements, regarding the relevant provisions of law.

However, the Attorney General’s Chambers is not at liberty to divulge any facts pertaining to their cases as the matters are pending before the court.

Thursday, May 11, 2017

LCIA hands down award designed to frustrate US DOJ investigation-Settlement includes sham transaction in a tax haven

by Ganesh Sahathevan


The London Stock Exchange was informed this morning:



Following the announcement on 24 April 2017 of the conditional settlement reached between International Petroleum Investment Company PJSC (IPIC), Aabar Investments PJS (Aabar), the Minister of Finance (Incorporated) Malaysia (MoF Inc.) and 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a consent award was made on 9 May 2017. Accordingly, the settlement in respect of the arbitration proceedings at the London Court of International Arbitration is now unconditional.


Malaysia's ruling UMNO has declared publicly that the settlement is intended to frustrate an ongoing US DOJ investigation into the multi-billion dollar theft from 1MDB.The state owned Straits Trimes of Singapore first reported the manoeuvre by Malaysia and Abu Dhabi,and later reported how a sham transaction will be used to effect the settlement. 

The LCIA cannot claim ignorance of these reports, given the extent and sources of reporting on the matter. 
END



Thursday, April 27, 2017

Illegality may prevent London Arbitration Court from making a consent award in the IPIC-1MDB matter-Settlement may be denied


by Ganesh Sahathevan



Settlement weakens DOJ's case



IPIC informed the LSE on Monday:


International Petroleum Investment Company PJSC (IPIC), Aabar Investments PJS (Aabar), the Minister of Finance (Incorporated) Malaysia (MoF Inc.) and 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) are pleased to announce that an agreement has been reached between all parties that provides for a settlement in respect to the arbitration proceedings at the London Court of International Arbitration (the Settlement). The agreement is conditional on the Arbitration Tribunal making a consent award by 31 May 2017.


Meanwhile, a  senior figure in the Malaysian Government and ruling UMNO ,Puad Zarkashi, has said publicly that the settlement is intended to defeat a criminal investigation by the US Department of Justice ,and other national enforcement agencies into 1 MDB, the Malaysian Government and Najib Razak , the Prime Minister and Finance Minister: 

"This arbitration settlement has weakened the US DOJ civil suit and claims that 1MDB's funds were stolen," said Umno supreme council member Mohd Puad Zakarshi in a statement today.Mohd Puad is also the director-general of the Information Ministry's Special Affairs Division (Jasa).

While the rules governing arbitration courts are complex, it is hard to see that the London Court Of International  Arbitration  would want  to be a party to a  consent award where at least one party has made public that the award will be used as a means to defeat a a criminal investigation.To make matters worse, this is a matter that has been very widely publicized. worldwide and it would be impossible for anyone, including the arbitrators in this matter, to deny knowledge of what is intended.

END




Other references:

1MDB -IPIC settlement: 1MDB insists that IPIC will be paid out of "units" guaranteed by IPIC itself:-IPIC now implicated in money laundering



In July 2016 IPIC denied ever guaranteeing "fund units" which are central to its settlement with 1MDB:Units worthless without the guarantee

LCIA IPIC-1MDB consent award further complicated by revelation that IPIC is directly involved in a sham transaction,not disclosed to holders of its debt securities

by Ganesh Sahathevan



According to senior financial and legal executives, the main hurdle was fund units amounting to US$2.43 billion (S$3.4 billion) held by two 1MDB subsidiaries, Brazen Sky and 1MDB Global Investments, that were guaranteed by IPIC subsidiary Aabar Investments PJS. Aabar had disputed the guarantee.
To overcome the hurdle, 1MDB agreed to waive its right to claim from Aabar the US$2.43 billion guarantee. In return, Abu Dhabi arranged for an undisclosed entity domiciled in the Seychelles to buy the units from 1MDB at the guaranteed value, to be settled by deferred payments from this month to October 2022, said a senior financial executive familiar with the matter.

The transaction highlighted above implies that IPIC is  involved in a round robin transaction where it is in effect paying itself. Worse, the transaction will be booked at the guaranteed value , even after the guarantee is waived. This is clearly a sham transaction.
This new Straits Times revelation adds to the issues of illegality that taint the IPIC-1MDB settlement (see story below),and in fact shows IPIC itself to be directly involved in a new transaction in which the implication of money laundering is hard to avoid.
In addition , given IPIC's   reporting obligations to the London Stock Exchange and its own bondholders pursuant to its GMTN debt programme, the ST story shows IPIC to be guilty of concealing material information from the market.
The London Court Of International Arbitration (LCIA) is being asked to hand down a consent award that will encompass this and all the other transactions currently under investigation by the US Department Of Justice and the FBI, who  the Malaysian Government has made no secret they expect will be defeated by the LCIA consent award.
The likelihood that the consent award will be denied to illegality gets ever more likely.
END