Monday, April 3, 2023

Leonardo DiCaprio says Malaysian financier Jho Low planned to donate to Obama's 2012 campaign -Revelation might explain why Obama met Riza Aziz, despite the scandal surrounding Riza

 by Ganesh Sahathevan



CNA and agencies have reported: 

Actor Leonardo DiCaprio told a Washington jury on Monday (Apr 3) that Malaysian financier Jho Low revealed his plans to donate up to US$30 million to help US President Barack Obama's 2012 reelection campaign in what prosecutors allege was part of an illegal foreign influence operation.

"It was a casual conversation about what party he was in support of," DiCaprio said, telling jurors that Low said he planned on giving "a significant donation" to the Democratic Party that was "somewhere to the tune of US$20-30 million".

DiCaprio's revelation may explain why Obama met Najib's son Riza Aziz in 2013, a question raised by this writer in 2017. As mentioned:


The WSJ  reported in 2016:


Malaysia’s government-fund scandal, one of the world’s biggest alleged white-collar crimes, has been connected to a Hollywood studio, high-end U.S. real estate—and now, a visit to the White House.

Federal investigators are looking into whether money improperly obtained from the Malaysian fund was paid to a businessman who later arranged an Oval Office visit for relatives of the Malaysian prime minister, according to people familiar with the probe.

The businessman is Frank White Jr., an entrepreneur who helped start an investment firm called DuSable Capital Management LLC, along with partners including a rap star. Mr. White has also raised funds for President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Mr. White’s Malaysian connections were on display in December 2013 when he escorted to the Oval Office a delegation that included the son and stepson of Malaysia’s prime minister, according to visitor records. Actor Leonardo DiCaprio and director Martin Scorsese accompanied them to present to the president a copy of “The Wolf of Wall Street,” a film the stepson, Riza Aziz, co-produced. 


As this writer then noted:

By December 2013 Riza Aziz was already in the news,in the US and elsewhere for all the wrong reasons, including money laundering and use of state funds to finance his movie making career. Some examples of what was already in the public domain have been copied and pasted below.

There is now the suspicion that Jho Low did in fact finance Obama's 2012 re-election campaign. 



TO BE READ WITH 

Friday, January 13, 2017

Why did Obama meet Riza Aziz, and why did the CIA not advise against that meeting, or did it?







My selfie with President Obama !


Image result for obama najib



by Ganesh Sahathevan 

The WSJ  reported in 2016:


Malaysia’s government-fund scandal, one of the world’s biggest alleged white-collar crimes, has been connected to a Hollywood studio, high-end U.S. real estate—and now, a visit to the White House.

Federal investigators are looking into whether money improperly obtained from the Malaysian fund was paid to a businessman who later arranged an Oval Office visit for relatives of the Malaysian prime minister, according to people familiar with the probe.

The businessman is Frank White Jr., an entrepreneur who helped start an investment firm called DuSable Capital Management LLC, along with partners including a rap star. Mr. White has also raised funds for President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Mr. White’s Malaysian connections were on display in December 2013 when he escorted to the Oval Office a delegation that included the son and stepson of Malaysia’s prime minister, according to visitor records. Actor Leonardo DiCaprio and director Martin Scorsese accompanied them to present to the president a copy of “The Wolf of Wall Street,” a film the stepson, Riza Aziz, co-produced.


By December 2013 Riza Aziz was already in the news,in the US and elsewhere for all the wrong reasons, including money laundering and use of state funds to finance his movie making career. Some examples of what was already in the public domain have been copied and pasted below.

A junior open source (OSINT) analyst would have picked all or any of this up with a simple Google search.One assumes of course that the CIA and other US intelligence services backgrounded these visitors to the Oval Office.If they did not,they need to explain why.

Assuming that they did, why then did they not advise against the meeting? Or did they ,but were ignored by Obama and his advisers?
END 

This should have alerted the CIA to the issue:

From the Hollywood Reporter, May 2012:


Red Granite was formed by Riza Aziz — the 35-year-old son of Malaysian Prime Minster Tun Abdul Razak and among the new generation of film financiers flocking to Hollywood — and Joey McFarland, 40
THR: How much money are you backed by?
McFarland: We do not talk about that. 

Aziz: I will say that I have money invested in the company. It shows that I have skin in the game and am committed from a financial point of view. We also have a group of investors, mainly from the Middle East and Asia.


A simple Internet search would have revealed Riza's Linkedin profile ,and shown  that Riza was ,  prior to becoming a Hollywood movie producer,  a UK bank officer.. That alone should have raised questions about his "skin", especially after his partner Joey McFraland insisted that they "do not talk" about their source of funds. 

Image result for rosmah new york penthouse


There was then this article from a well known celebrity blogger in Malaysia, which should have raised immediate concerns:





Dec 13, 2012


RIZA AZIZ, 35 YEAR OLD SON OF PRIME MINISTER DATUK SERI NAJIB TUN 

RAZAK, BUYS RM 100 MILLION CONDO IN NEW YORK CITY


CNN REPORTED RIZA AZIZ PAID A STAGGERING US$ 33.5 MILLION (RM 100.5 MILLION) FOR A HIGHCLASS NEW YORK CITY CONDO BUT WRONGLY MENTIONED "MR AZIZ IS A SON OF TUN ABDUL RAZAK, THE MALAYSIA PRIME MINISTER FROM 1970 TO 1976".

See, even CNN can make foolish mistakes and get their facts seriously wrong!

Isn't Riza Aziz, based on his age of only 35, the son of Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak rather than his grandfather? Well, Riza is an investment banker who worked in London for the last 10 years and accumulated a vast fortune there 
by investing in houses and properties and the stock market. 
A million ringgit house ( a mere L 200,000) bought 10 years ago 
can now be worth a million pounds (RM 5 million) and if you had 
bought 10 such houses, you could have made a profit of 
RM 40 million!

This fabulous 15-room, 7,738 sq ft condo has fantastic views from 
its wraparound 1,244 sq ft balcony and is one of the most exclusive 
and expensive condos not only in New York City but the world. In fact, 
even if I am given this condo totally free, I still cannot afford to live in it?

Why?

The monthly maintenance fee is RM 60,000!

Riza Aziz is also the founder owner of Red Granite, a production house
 which makes him a Hollywood movie producer. Riza is a close friend of 
Leonardo diCapracio and funded the RM 300 million movie 
'The Wolf of Wall Street' which begun shooting in New York last August.

Red Granite was launched at Cannes Film Festival in 2010 in what
 was dubbed the 'hottest party in years' and attended by all the hottest stars attending the Cannes Film Festival.

Riza Aziz also met Kris Aquino, sister of the President of the 
Philippines and she tweeted she was surprised to learn "he is a 
Hollywood producer. 
Napayasosyal." Well, based on Kris's acting career, don't be 
surprised if she asked to be in his next movie which may star 
Daniel Radcliffe of 'Harry Potter' fame.




This 2012 article confirms and adds to stories about Riza Aziz's investment 
portfolio, which seems to have come out of nowhere:

Housing & Economy December 7, 2012, 3:00 pm

Big Ticket | Sold for $33.5 Million

By ROBIN FINN

The Park Laurel condominium
Librado Romero/The New York Times The Park Laurel condominium
A large and lavish duplex penthouse that dominates one of the asymmetrical towers at the Park Laurel, a luxury condominium residence built in 2000 and anchored by the historic McBurney School, sold for $33.5 million and was the most expensive sale of the week, according to city records.

The penthouse, No. 29A, a sprawling 15-room combination of three units designed by the architect Alan Wanzenberg for a previous owner, occupies 7,738 square feet of interior space and has a 1,244-square-foot wraparound trophy terrace that faces south and captures both park and city views. There are seven bedrooms, five bathrooms, two powder rooms and a personal elevator entrance.

Special attention was paid to soundproofing: a 2010 listing for the apartment noted that, in addition to radiant-heated tiles in the master bath, the unit had been soundproofed by JRH Acoustical Consulting, with all pipes insulated to achieve “sound elimination.” Carrying charges are around $20,000 per month. 

The Park Laurel, at 15 West 63rd Street, was designed by Beyer Blinder Belle and Costas Kondylis with an eye to the Modernist architecture at Lincoln Center nearby. Previous residents include J. Michael Evans, a Goldman Sachs vice chairman and potential successor to Lloyd C. Blankfein. His 5,000-square-foot Gwathmey Siegel-designed duplex penthouse, No. 40/41, is currently listedfor sale with Douglas Elliman Real Estate for $26.5 million. For $29.25 million, Mr. Evans, who decamped to 995 Fifth Avenue this summer, will throw in an auxiliary two-bedroom unit he owns on the 14th floor.

When No. 29A changed hands in 2010, the seller was the hedge-fund honcho Ephraim F. Gildor, the asking price was $28 million, and the Swiss buyers, Peter Edward Chadney and Simone Cecile Von Graffenried Simperl, paid $23.98 million. Agents from Douglas Elliman represented both parties in the deal. This time around, there was apparently no formal listing; both Janice Chang and Raphael De Niro, who were involved in the 2010 transaction, confirmed that they had no connection to the $33.5 million deal.

Mr. Chadney and Ms. Simperl used Park Laurel Ltd., a company based in Zurich, to identify themselves in city records, and the buyer, based in Los Angeles, acquired the penthouse under the shield of a limited-liability company, Park Laurel Acquisition.

The sale appeared in city records on Dec. 4 and a post that day on the Web site of The Real Deal identified the buyer as Riza Aziz, an investment banker and a founder of Red Granite Pictures, a fledgling film company in Beverly Hills, Calif. Mr. Aziz is a son of Tun Abdul Razak, the Malaysian prime minister from 1970 to 1976. His film company’s debut offering was “Friends With Kids”; it is currently producing “The Wolf of Wall Street,” a $100 million venture directed by Martin Scorsese, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and filming in New York City. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Mr. Aziz and Mr. DiCaprio are fast friends.
Big Ticket includes closed sales from the previous week, ending Wednesday.
A version of this article appeared in print on 12/09/2012, on page 
RE2 of the NewYork edition with the headline: $33,500,000.












NSW Law Society granted Associate Membership to a person who provided a "certificate" from a foreign university that does not exist - NSW Law Society and NSW LPAB have questions to answer

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



                                      


This is an excerpt from Nine Network's Current Affair story by  Hannah Sinclair,  about one  Alexander Stuart Pinnock who practised as "a fake lawyer under the alias Alec Stuart":



Pinnock's web of deception began when he got his hands on a fake degree.

"I received my legal qualifications at Charleston State University in South Carolina in the United States," Pinnock said. But he never went to that university because it doesn't exist.

Charleston State University is a website that offers fake degrees for life experience.

For one like Pinnock's, it costs around $522.

The website is so convincing, Pinnock said he believed his degree was real.

"It was not a study course; it was all granted under recognition of prior learning," Pinnock said.

Pinnock believed his previous experience as a ranger for the City of Sydney, coupled with qualifications he claimed to have gained in investigations and business studies were enough to equip him with a law degree without ever studying.

"I received the certificate. I sent it the next day to the New South Wales Law Society along with an application for associate membership," Pinnock said.

"They reviewed it. I received a telephone call saying it had been approved and I was issued a membership number

 

There are a number of problems with the account above, which require explanation from the NSW Law Society, and the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board .First, Associate Membership is provided to persons who are legally qualified provided the "legal qualification (is) recognised for the purposes of admission as a lawyer in Australia". 

Being a non-existent entity, it is very highly unlikely that  a law degree from Charleston State University in South Carolina in the United States is or would have been in the list of "legal qualification(s) recognised for the purposes of admission as a lawyer in Australia". 

In any event, being a qualification from a foreign university the qualifications would have had to be first submitted to the NSW Legal Profession Admission Board (LPAB) for evaluation. There is then usually a direction from the NSW LPAB  to undertake and pass studies in legal subjects offered by the NSW LPAB in order to be considered by the NSW LPAB to be fit and proper for admission to practise. 

Finally, as anyone who has dealt with the very thorough and meticulous officers of the NSW LPAB and NSW Law Society would know, one does not simply submit a "certificate", one must submit a duly certified statement of academic record, which would contain the details of subject studied and grades obtained. 

The NSW Law Society and NSW LPAB seemed to have overlooked all of the above in granting Pinnock Associate Membership. 

That however, is not all. According the Cassandra Banks,President Of law Society NSW:

.........he falsely declared that he was the holder of a current NSW practising certificate in order to obtain a NSW Law Society membership card for those who hold practising certificates.This was two months after he had been granted Associate Membership.

Note however that Pinnock saysI sent (the Charleston State University) certificate....to the New South Wales Law Society along with an application for associate membership," Pinnock said.

"They reviewed it. I received a telephone call saying it had been approved and I was issued a membership number.

Banks also says:

Mr Pinnock created a false NSW Practising certificate and Certificate of Good Standing, which were used to apply for a practising certificate in Queensland


How Pinnock managed to forge a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the NSW LPAB and a  NSW Practising certificate is a mystery. The style, form and content of these documents are not commonly known. 

The NSW Law Society and the NSW LPAB must provide clarification and the names of all involved in this incident.A formulation of words will not suffice. 


END 


Statement by the President of the Law Society of NSW Cassandra Banks:

The application form for Associate Membership makes clear you should not use that form if you wish to hold a practising certificate.

The Society's website also makes clear that you need a practising certificate in order to practice law in NSW.

Admissions continued throughout the pandemic and were conducted online. This was widely known at the time.

For one of the matters in respect of which Mr Pinnock is convicted for holding himself out as a lawyer, Mr Pinnock declared he had been admitted on 5 January 2020. This was not true.

Mr Pinnock would also appear to be well aware of the requirement for a practising certificate in order to practise as a solicitor.

For the above offence, Mr Pinnock created a false NSW Practising certificate and Certificate of Good Standing, which were used to apply for a practising certificate in Queensland. The application was later withdrawn.

For another offence where he was convicted of holding himself out as a solicitor, on 25 January 2022, he falsely declared that he was the holder of a current NSW practising certificate in order to obtain a NSW Law Society membership card for those who hold practising certificates.

This was two months after he had been granted Associate Membership.

These do not appear to be the actions of a person who misunderstood the requirement to hold a practising certificate.

Mr Pinnock pleaded guilty to all offences.

The letter to Mr Pinnock of 17 March 2023 has invited him to put in writing any additional information he wishes to provide. The Society also encouraged him to seek legal advice before making further disclosures. This is appropriate given criminal proceedings against Mr Pinnock remained before the Court at that time and that he is unrepresented.

The Society considers all allegations of unqualified practice referred to it.

In the absence of consent from Mr Pinnock in respect of the information provided by him as part of his application, further comment is not able to be provided.

Yang DiPertuan Agong has no power to determine “which is the better judgment" - Najib's application for pardon based on a dissenting judgement seems self-defeating, provided the Agong confines himself to what the law of the land permits him to do

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 


           There is a limit to what the Agong can do for this son of  Pahang


FMT has reported:


Najib Razak is seeking to use the dissenting judgment by Federal Court judge Abdul Rahman Sebli to support his application for a royal pardon, said his lawyer Shafee Abdullah.

Shafee said Rahman’s minority judgment has been included in the application for a royal pardon, which is being prepared.

“Our pardon request is exactly what Rahman said in his judgment. The request for pardon is not because, ‘Oh, I did wrong, I’m sorry and therefore I throw myself upon your mercy’, no.

“This is not the pardon that is normally the case,” he said at a press conference at the Kuala Lumpur court complex today.

He said the request would state that the former prime minister did not receive a fair trial, adding that his case was not heard in the apex court and the prosecution was heard by the judges ex parte.

Shafee also said the majority judgment would be sent to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for comparison, to see “which is the better judgment”.


The Agong has no power to see “which is the better judgment” but he does have the power to grant a  pardon. However, in Shafee's word: 
The request for pardon is not because, ‘Oh, I did wrong, I’m sorry and therefore I throw myself upon your mercy’, no.

It does therefore appear that Najib has precluded the Agong from granting  him a pardon. Of course, it is assumed that the Agong will confines himself to what the law of the land permits him to do.
He is a not an absolute monarch but a constitutional whose powers are constrained by the Constitution. 
END 

See Also 

Saturday, April 1, 2023

Saudi Aramco will invest in refineries in China, and will prioritise supply of oil to China - Deal announced recently might leave Petronas Rapid gasping for oil

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 

      Fires and other mechanical issues may be the least of the Aramco-Petronas RAPID JV's problems


CEO World quoting Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Hassan Naseer  reported on  23 March 2023: 

Aramco said Monday it has agreed to acquire 10% of Rongsheng Petrochemical Co. Ltd. for $3.6 billion as part of its downstream expansion in China. The deal with Rongsheng sees Aramco supplying 480,000 bpd of petroleum from Saudi to what it said is China’s biggest integrated refining and chemicals plant.

“Among other assets, Rongsheng owns a 51% equity interest in ZPC [Zhejiang Petroleum and Chemical Co. Ltd.], which in turn owns and operates the largest integrated refining and chemicals complex in China with a capacity to process 800,000 bpd of crude oil and to produce 4.2 million metric tons of ethylene per year”, Aramco said in a press release.

The announcement came a day after Saudi Aramco said its joint refining and petrochemical complex in Panjin City, Liaoning Province in northeast China, is due to start construction in the second quarter. Expected to cost over $12 billion, the project includes a refinery that can produce up to 300,000 barrels per day (bpd).

Earlier Aramco said the Huajin Aramco Petrochemical Co. (HAPCO) joint venture, where the Saudi company has 30 percent ownership, will begin construction for the Panjin integrated refinery and petrochemical complex by June.


In 2021 this writer asked where Saudi Aramco's plans to "prioritise energy supply to China" would leave Petronas RAPID in Pengerang with regards Aramco's promise to supply 70% of RAPID's feedstock. 

Now, with the commitment to build refineries in China, there will be no need for RAPID's products either. It does appear that RAPID is going be left dry, without supply.

The first signs of trouble emerged in 2017 when Saudi Aramco pulled out of an agreement to invest in RAPID. Saudi Aramco did however agree to supply 50-70% of the project's crude oil feedstock.  That did not come as a surprise to this writer, who noted that even at the outset, Aramco never said anything about a cash commitment. 


END 



Sunday, March 21, 2021

Saudi Aramco to prioritise energy supply to China for half a century- Where does that leave Petronas RAPID at Pengerang?

 by Ganesh Sahathevan 



Aramco has not said it is investing 
will be in crude oil, not cash




Saudi Aramco has announced that it will prioritise energy supply to China for half a centur
y. The guarantee appears to be for a supply of crude, not refined products.


Meanwhile Saudi Aramco has undertaken to  meet most of the crude feedstock requirements of the PETRONAS RAPID refinery in Pengerang. That deal has been controversial from the outset (see below); it will be interesting to see if Saudi Aramco remains in a position to fulfil its obligations to RAPID.

Note that the Saudi guarantee to China says nothing about refined product from RAPID. 


TO BE READ WITH 



Sunday, March 26, 2017

RAPID refinery " needs a specific type of crude oil "-Petronas executive VP Md Arif Mahmood explains why RAPID refinery will not be as advanced as public were led to believe

by Ganesh Sahathevan





The RAPID refinery is meant to be a very modern refinery  capable of turning virtually any crude oil into  high end products (the technical term is high complexity).

Modern refineries are not supposed to rely on any particular crude for it makes them beholden to a particular supplier or suppliers; but here we have Petronas executive VP Md Arif Mahmood (photo above) insisting :

"This refinery (Rapid) needs a specific type of crude oil that will allow us to make the necessary cut to supply to the petrochemical plants".


END 


Petronas defends RM31b joint venture with Saudi Aramco



In the wake of concerns raised over alleged attempts to sabotage the nation's economy, Petronas has defended its decision to pursue a RM31 billion deal with Saudi Aramco for the Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Development (Rapid) in Pengerang, Johor.

English-daily The Malay Mail quoted Petronas group executive vice-president Md Arif Mahmood as saying that it was "never forced into the joint venture" and had always been eyeing a partner like Aramco.

"How can we be forced to do this deal? We were looking for a partner that would complement the project.

"We are not selling Rapid as reported. It’s a 50-50 partnership," Md Arif is reported as saying in an interview.

The Rapid project is part of Petronas’ Pengerang Integrated Complex (PIC), estimated to cost as much as US$27 billion.

"We are looking for partners to invest and co-invest. And selling and co-investing are very different," he pointed out.

Md Arif also said not many people were aware that discussions between Petronas and Aramco have been ongoing since 2014.

"The discussions with the Saudis took more than two-and-a-half years. They looked at the due diligence of the investment opportunities.

"It is not like it is only yesterday we decided to partner Aramco," he said in describing the partnership as being "an obvious and perfect" one.

The deal signing was formally witnessed by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and Saudi King Salman on Feb 28 as part of the king's agenda while on a state visit to Malaysia.

Md Arif dismissed as "not credible" reports that said senior Petronas officials were against the joint-venture with Aramco and had to be forced into it.

"I am going to make this very clear. It had to be within the terms agreeable, not only for us but agreeable to both parties before we could actually get to the stage where we are now," he stressed.

Among others, Md Arif said, Rapid would be supplying at least 50 percent of the 300,000 barrels of crude oil to be refined a day at its facilities.

On reasons for partnering with Aramco, he said Petronas needed a partner that would be able to leverage its strength and manage the risks at the same time.

"Why Aramco? It is the biggest crude supplier in the world with a supply capacity of 10 million barrels a day," he said.

"This refinery (Rapid) needs a specific type of crude oil that will allow us to make the necessary cut to supply to the petrochemical plants.

"To have a crude supplier as a partner, for long-term crude security, that itself is a good reason why Aramco," Md Arif added.


Najib last week accused a former leader of spreading lies about Malaysia, which he said had nearly scuttled the deal between Petronas and Saudi Aramco.

In the veiled attack apparently aimed at Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia chairperson Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Najib lamented that the opposition would rather create false propaganda than to engage on facts.

END 
References

Crude oils have different quality characteristics
graph of Density and sulfur content of selected crude oils, as described in the article text
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on Energy Intelligence Group—International Crude Oil Market Handbook.
Notes: Points on the graph are labeled by country and benchmark name and are color coded to correspond with regions in the map below. The graph does not indicate price or volume output values. United States-Mars is an offshore drilling site in the Gulf of Mexico. WTI = West Texas Intermediate; LLS = Louisiana Light Sweet; FSU = Former Soviet Union; UAE = United Arab Emirates. 

Republished: June 26, 2013: Map was corrected.
Many types of crude oil are produced around the world. The market value of an individual crude stream reflects its quality characteristics. Two of the most important quality characteristics are density and sulfur content. Density ranges from light to heavy, while sulfur content is characterized as sweet or sour. The crude oils represented in the chart are a selection of some of the crude oils marketed in various parts of the world. There are some crude oils both below and above the API gravity range shown in the chart.

Crude oils that are light (higher degrees of API gravity, or lower density) and sweet (low sulfur content) are usually priced higher than heavy, sour crude oils. This is partly because gasoline and diesel fuel, which typically sell at a significant premium to residual fuel oil and other "bottom of the barrel" products, can usually be more easily and cheaply produced using light, sweet crude oil. The light sweet grades are desirable because they can be processed with far less sophisticated and energy-intensive processes/refineries. The figure shows select crude types from around the world with their corresponding sulfur content and density characteristics.



References-Wikipedia

Jump up^ "Nelson Complexity Index" (PDF). pakpas.org. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
Jump up^ "Nelson Index". investopedia.com. Investopedia. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
Jump up^ David C. Johnston; Daniel Johnston (2006). Introduction to Oil Company Financial Analysis. PennWell Books. p. 199. ISBN 9781593700447. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
Jump up^ Johnston, Daniel (March 18, 1996). "Refining Report Complexity index indicates refinery capability, value". ogj.com. Oil and Gas Journal. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
Jump up^ "PMI-Oman 2014". pmioman14.wordpress.com. Retrieved 3 November 2016.
Jump up^ Nelson's Complexity Factor (PDF), Reliance Industries Ltd, retrieved 2009-02-28