Thursday, August 8, 2019

"Anyone who offends China will be killed no matter how far the target is"-What is Michael Spence of USYD doing to prevent a repeat of the Chinese threat to Indian students on August 15 2018?





SIP Administrative Committee. Spence has established a Sydney University centre in the SIP.









by Ganesh Sahathevan



On 15 August 2018, India's Independence Day , a group of Chinese

nationals paraded via Sydney University threatening Indians and Indian students with murder. The University's Vice Chancellor Reverend Dr Michael Spence did nothing, and has made no comment on the matter.



The Chinese processed in a convoy of luxury cars decorated with their threats against Indian students. The SBS reported:


The cars were decorated with the Chinese flag and stickers featuring slogans including: "Borderline is our baseline;" "China: Not even a bit can be left behind;" and, "Anyone who offends China will be killed no matter how far the target is."


"Anyone who offends China will be killed no matter how far the target is."









Almost a year has passed sincethat incident and yet Spence and

Sydney University maintain their silence, seemingly oblivious to

the safety of Indian students.India's Independence Day 2019 falls

that there will not be a repeat of the incident last year.



END















  • (Sydney Today)
  • (Supplied by Sydney Today)
  • (Sydney Today)
  • (Sydney Today)
  • (Supplied by Sydney Today)
As Indian and Chinese soldiers remain locked in a two-month standoff over a border dispute in the Himalayas, some Chinese Australians decided to protest India in their flashy supercars on the India's Independence Day.
English
By 
Heidi Han

16 AUG 2017 - 9:42 AM  UPDATED YESTERDAY 5:09 PM
On Tuesday 15th August at around 12:40pm, a fleet of supercars, organized by a Sydney-based Australian Chinese automobile club, started their parade, led by a red Bentley covered by Chinese flag pattern.Chinese Ferrari Protest Sydney


Bentleys, Lamborghinis, BMW, AUDI and Maseratis were among the 10 luxury cars that joined the parade across Sydney, passing three universities including Sydney University, the University of New South Wales and the University of Technology Sydney. It comes not long after a spate of racist anti-Chinese graffiti and posters were identified in Universities across Australia.



Additionally, the cars continued their parade past some places of interest including Chinatown, Martin Place, Sydney Opera House, the Art Gallery of NSW, before arriving at their ultimate destination - the Consulate General of India in Sydney.
Chinese Ferrari Protest Sydney


The cars were decorated with the Chinese flag and stickers featuring slogans including: "Borderline is our baseline;" "China: Not even a bit can be left behind;" and, "Anyone who offends China will be killed no matter how far the target is."


"Anyone who offends China will be killed no matter how far the target is."


The latter is a hard-core tagline of a recent Chinese patriotic action film Wolf Warriors 2.



India and China in stand-off over Himalayan border dispute

America has encouraged China and India to engage in dialogue in order to reduce tensions over a border dispute in the Himalayas.


The cars revved their engines loudly outside the Consulate General of India in Sydney, to protest against India over an escalating military situation between India and China, with both sides accusing the other of territorial intrusions.


The day they chose for the protests was of particular significance as Indian Australians around the country celebrated Independence day - marking the 70 anniversary of the handover from British rule.

Saari-clad MP seeks recognition of India's independence day in Parliament
Four New South Wales MPs have spoken in the state Parliament to pay tribute to the people who made sacrifices for India's independence from the British rule.
Chinese Ferrari Protest Sydney
Chinese Ferrari Protest Sydney



"To demonstrate our determination to defense our sovereignty in a civilized way."


The organiser, who requested to remain anonymous, told local Chinese media outlet Sydney Today that the drivers voluntarily joined the demonstration, aiming to attract public attention to the meaning of the parade, not just to show off their cars.


The organiser said therefore that all the drivers chose to drive slowly and "strictly comply with road rules - with no horn, no speeding and not window-opening".


"To demonstrate our determination to defense our sovereignty in a civilized way," said the organizer.


"We are a group of hard working people and hope to contribute to the community. We are not those who got nothing to do but drive around. We hope people recognized our actions.”


However not everyone in the community agrees with the protest.


A comment left on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, describes it as "pretentious behaviors by the rich second generation". Another comment condemns government's inaction, "why do we pay (tax) to have the army then? "


The news has also stirred up some discussion on SBS Punjabi's Facebook page.


Consulate General of India in Sydney told SBS Mandarin via phone that they were neither aware nor affected by the car protest as the Consulate was officially closed on the Independence Day.


Wednesday, August 7, 2019

Darwin Port deal will provide Chinese naval vessels with facilitated access to Australia,and more : Statement by law firm Corrs shows Dave Tollner to be poorly informed, or worse

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Listen to the Skynews interview with former NT Treasurer Dave Tollner ,where Tollner sounds like your typical Australian politician who expects his audience to be as dumb and naive as he.In this case that idiocy is even more apparent, given this statement from the Corrs website:

Darwin is intended to be a crucial link in China's new 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. The recent Darwin Port deal will provide Chinese shipping and naval vessels with facilitated access to Australia, the Indian Ocean and the South Pacific, as well as to Indonesia and PNG over the coming century





Friday, September 29, 2017


Corrs CEO John W.H. Denton has made himself ,

and Corrs a matter of national security ;it is in the national interest that Corrs China deals be open to public scrutiny

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Current Chinese President Xi Jinping with Corrs CEO John W.H. Denton
Former Chinese President Hu Jintao with Corrs CEO John W.H. Dentonnto


Anyone,let alone a major law firm and a very senior lawyer,who says these things and buttresses it with photos of the type above, invites public scrutiny.
In fact,statements of this type,proudly published on the Corrs website, invite not only Australian public scrutiny, but attention from intelligence agencies of all affected countries:


In a recent visit to Xinjiang in China's far west, the Corrs China Business Group met with numerous officials who enthusiastically shared their role in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).This initiative (one of a number of initiatives encompassed by OBOR) is intended to promote connectivity across Pakistan with a network of highways, railways and pipelines accompanied by energy, industrial and other infrastructure development projects to address critical energy shortages needed to boost Pakistan’s economic growth. Eventually, CPEC will also facilitate trade along an overland route that connects China to the Indian Ocean, linking the Chinese city of Kashgar to the Pakistani port of Gwadar.
In a world that is increasingly interconnected and as a trading nation, Australia has a significant role to play in the policy thinking on global maritime economic issues. Australia is working with Chinese officials as they develop the country’s maritime economy strategy. As a maritime trading nation, these strategic issues of vital importance to us, including their political dimensions. Attracting capital to Northern Australia as part of OBOR will be a key focus.Darwin is intended to be a crucial link in China's new 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. The recent Darwin Port deal will provide Chinese shipping and naval vessels with facilitated access to Australia, the Indian Ocean and the South Pacific, as well as to Indonesia and PNG over the coming century.


n

None of China's trading partners show it "respect",nor has it been demanded-Why is it an issue in Australia,and is not Australia better served following the example set by Mahathir?

by Ganesh Sahathevan
Keating lacks Mahathir's skill as a politician, diplomat and businessman.With regards 
China Australiais better served following the example set by Mahathir, not Keating


A conversation between the ABC's Laura Tingle and China expert Paul Keating which captures Australia's policy of appeasement  towards China in order to preserve trade:


LAURA TINGLE: How dangerous is it for Australia in terms of its relation with China for us to have been put on the spot like this (contemplating a request for US mid range missiles to be placed on Australian soil directed at China)?

PAUL KEATING: Well, (US Secretary of State Mike) Pompeo, look the Americans know we have difficulties currently with the Chinese brought about by the Turnbull government and more locally.

So, a little bit of diplomacy and manners wouldn't have gone astray but Pompeo rides in to town, doing the Rodney Rude act, you know, saying, "Either you have soybeans or you look after your soul" or words to that effect. What did he say, something, you know?

I mean, the only thing to know about American secretaries of state these days is under Trump they don't last long.




Keating reflects the absurd Australian policy that China must be kept happy in order to preserve the trade relationship. China will buy what it needs at the best price, from friend or foe,regardless of sentiment. It is called business,something that Australian policymakers seem unable to comprehend. 


To put things in perspective, note that China is Taiwan's largest trading partner.



Australian interests are better served following in the example of Malaysia's Mahathir, not Keating.


END

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

Leaks from within the Australian Intelligence Community, incompetence, real reasons why allies have curtailed intelligence sharing:Nick Warner blaming leaks to journalists a poor attempt at blame shifting

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Director General of National Intelligence Nick WarnerPHOTO: Nick Warner warns other countries will not hand over intelligence if they think it could be leaked. (AAP: Alan Porritt)


Nick Warner will know this to be untrue:


"The unauthorised disclosure or publication of foreign partner information could have serious ramifications, including putting at risk Australia's relationship with those partners and that country," Mr Warner said.


"Put simply, if those partners do not trust Australian intelligence agencies to keep their intelligence information secret, they will not share it."



The real and historical concern for  Australia's foreign intelligence partners has been  with leaks from within the Australian Intelligence community, civil servants and politicians, to other foreign agencies. The following are examples of incidents over the years.


First:
In 1948, after the US government decided Australia was a security risk and banned the sharing of classified information, Britain's Security Service (MI5) assisted in planning a new Australian security intelligence service. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), was established by the Chifley government on 16 March 1949. It took over the security functions of the Commonwealth Investigation Service and was concerned with any threats of espionage and sabotage, and with subversive actions by people or organisations.
 Then in the 1990s: 



The Office of National Assessments provides overall strategic and diplomatic analysis to the Federal Government.

The Defence Intelligence Organisation, where Jenkins worked, and the Office of National Assessments dealt separately with the CIA.

It was a time the Americans needed Australian expertise to help understand the events which would culminate in the downfall of Soeharto's Indonesian regime.

The CIA became concerned that information was being held back.

PROFESSOR DES BALL: ONA during that period was really quite complacent.

The view in ONA was that not only is Indonesian stability essential to Australian security, but because of our close intelligence and military links with Indonesia, we could pretty much guarantee that Indonesian stability and hence, indirectly, our own security.

And the notion that there was some finite length of time on Soeharto's life or on his reign or on his tenure never seemed to have crept into ONA analysis up until 1998.

ANDREW FOWLER: What did the Americans, and the CIA in particular, think of the kind of analysis they were getting through their major liaison partner in Washington?

PROFESSOR DES BALL: I think it's quite clear that CIA thought that the material coming from ONA was quite inadequate.

It was inadequate because it was insufficiently detailed.

It was inadequate because it tended to be anodyne, rather than coming to sharp conclusions.




And then there is the problem of New Zealand:
And as detailed in the reports below, Australia's leadership also has links to the Chinese Communist Party, and these too are likely to be of concerns to our allies. 


Compare all of the above to Warner's comments about leaks to the media being a threat to intelligence sharing, and it becomes clear that Warner is lying, probably in an attempt to shift blame away from the Australian Intelligence Community. 


END 



see also

Aunty's sneering aside, ASIO effectively kept communists in check