Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Maika and the Oriental Assurance Capital sale: Trustees led by Gnanalingam have no right to the proceeds ; RM 145 Million sent to Gnanalingam's Pembinaan Redzai should be clawed back;together with Tune Insurance IPO profits

by Ganesh Sahatevan

                                               
                                  MAIKA'S SAVIOURS:THE TRUSTEES
Tan Sri G.Gnanalingam

Ravin Ponniah

Tan Sri Ir. Kunasingam 
                                                               A/L V. Sittampalam

                                                               Dato’ N. Sadhasivan 

                                                                           
                                                                                Datuk R. Karunakaran



The Maika  rescue was initiated via a  trust GT Resoruces Sdn Bhd, and the trustees were the following persons :


Gnanalingam said GT Resources, run by a board of trustees chaired by him and comprising Datuk Kuna Sithampalan, Bank Negara and Petronas director Datuk N. Sadhasivan, ex-Malaysian Industrial Development Authority director-general Datuk R. Karunakaran and special officer in the Prime Minister's Department Ravin Ponniah, had already obtained 12 per cent of the shares held by the Maika management.

(Maika payout by July 31;23 April 2010New Straits Times)

This morning Sarawak Report has shown how some RM 145 Million, being the proceeds from the sale of Maika's then primary asset, its stake in Oriental Assurance Capital was paid over by Maika to Gnanalingam's private company , Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd.

That money needs to be clawed back, and the clawback should include any profits made by the trustees from the Tune Insurance IPO.

END 






Maika Papers Raise Further Concerns Over Shareholders' Missing Money

Maika Papers Raise Further Concerns Over Shareholders' Missing Money

Sarawak Report has viewed further documents that have so far remained hidden from the public relating to the disposal of Maika Holdings assets by supposed corporate ‘white knights’ deputed by the former government to ‘bail out’ the struggling fund.
The ‘rescue’ back in 2010 included a promise that any profits from the disposal of the company’s assets would be distributed amongst some sixty six thousand original shareholders of the fund – mostly members of the Malaysian Indian Congress party, linked to BN, who had received a paltry return on their investments over several years.
These papers indicate that in recent weeks liquidators have expressed acute concern that huge sums of cash arising from the sale of those assets went to the wrong place, namely a company owned by one of the said ‘white knights’ G Gnanalingam, instead of Maika Holdings itself (in order to be distributed to shareholders as was promised).
Loan at the centre of the dispute was from one of Mr Gnanalingan's companies Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd to G Team Resources & Holdings Sdn Bhd, which he set up to buy out Maika Holdings
Loan at the centre of the dispute was from one of Mr Gnanalingan’s companies Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd to G Team Resources & Holdings Sdn Bhd, which he set up to buy out Maika Holdings
Sarawak Report understands that the matter has now been referred to the police and MACC investigators, following a series of legal interchanges between the liquidators and G Gnanalingam viewed by Sarawak Report.

“Huge Mistake”

At the heart of the issue is what liquators described in a letter dated as late as September 4th of last year as a “huge mistake” on the part of previous managers of Maika Holdings, whom they say “wrongly transferred” the staggering sum of RM145,753,073.28 to Gnanalingam’s company Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd, which had advanced a loan of RM140 million to buy out Maika shares.
The company that received the loan, G Team Resources & Holdings Sdn Bhd, was also owned by Gnanlingam and was the entity authorised by Maika’s board (with the blessing of the government) to buy up the majority of Maika shares in 2010 as part of the ‘bail out’ plan for the floundering fund which was failing to pay dividends to its thousands of modest shareholders and had stopped producing accounts.
G Team used the RM140 million to buy out the majority of those ordinary shareholders, offering them just 80% of the original share price they had paid in for when the fund was launched in the 1980s at RM1.00 a share.
Publicly, Mr Gnanalingam, the board and the government made clear that any later profits to be raised from the sale of the fund’s remaining assets (most particularly a slice of land and a profitable insurance company) would subsequently also be returned to the self same original shareholders.
This was because Gnanalingam had been appointed to the task, without the discussion of other options or tenders, on the basis that he was acting as a “trustee” for the benefit of the shareholders only:
“G Team is supported by a Cabinet committee set up by the Prime Minister [Najib] which includes HSS Integrated executive director Datuk Kuna Sitthampalan, Bank Negara and Petroliam Nasional Bhd director Datuk N. Sadasivan, former Mida director-general Datuk R. Karunakaran and Prime Minister’s Department special officer Ravin Ponniah.
“They will become trustees of Maika when we take over the company,” Gnanalingam said.
[How it was explained at the time – Star newspaper]
However, according to the letter sent by the liquidator, when the majority of the insurance company Oriental Capital Assurance Berhad (OCA) was indeed sold to Tune Insurance Holdings (part of the Tony Fernandes controlled group of companies) the above sum of over RM145 million was then transferred by cheque straight back to Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd as an apparent repayment plus interest – rather than to Maika itself for proper distribution.
G Team itself meanwhile acquired 3.75% of the shares in insurance giant, for RM7,379,129.13.
Letter from the liquidator to Gnanalingan as owner of Pembinaan Redzai
Letter from the liquidator to Gnanalingan as owner of Pembinaan Redzai
It appears that Mr G Gnanalingam has refused to comply with the requests of the liquidators to rectify the “huge mistake” made back in 2015, which clearly meant that what profits there were from the sale of the insurance company to Tune were not distributed as was the declared intention.
There is another problem linked to this thorny issue, as several commentators have pointed out, which is that the valuation of the insurance giant at the time of that hasty sale appears to have been woefully underpriced. Tune Insurance (comprising mainly OCA) was floated a year later after the sale in 2012 for a hundred million dollars soon amassing a market capitalisation of RM1.2 billion.
That meant vast profits for Tune and G Team, which retained shares. It is understood that family members of Mr Gnanalinghan had also been absorbed onto the board of Tune Insurance.  However, none of these profits went towards swelling the miserable pay out originally provided to the ordinary shareholders.
A separate issue linked to the list of concerns surrounding Maika’s unusual ‘bail out’ relates to the disposal of money owed to some 5,800 shareholders of the fund (6.9%) who did not claim their pay out.  The approximately Rm7 million owing to them was not paid over to the public exchequer via Bank Negara, as demanded by the law, according to information available to the liquidators.
It cost some RM79 million to pay off the shareholders” says one source, who has researched the documents passed to the MACC, “yet some RM179 million was raised from the land sale and the sale of OCA. It means certain entities kept over RM100 million”.
And that was before the floatation of OCA

Sunday, March 10, 2019

TMJ & rulers are right to be concerned, and Wisma Putra is fudging-Malaysia ratifying Rome Statute can have consequences for the rulers;even Australia has sought to strictly define and limit the operation of the Rome.Statute of The ICC.

by Ganesh Saahthevan 




As reported by Malaysiakini:


Wisma Putra has assured that the position of the monarchy will not be threatened after Malaysia acceded to the Rome Statute, a treaty governing the International Criminal Court (ICC).
This came after Johor crown prince Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim claimed that the Malay rulers may no longer be relevant after Malaysia acceded to the treaty.
"Prior to joining the Rome Statute, the government had conducted an in-depth study on various aspects.
"The government is confident that the decision will not affect the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's position and immunity," Wisma Putra said in a statement today.
On Friday, Tunku Ismail was asked by the "Friends of Johor" Twitter account if the Rome Statute would threaten the monarchy.
He replied: "Yes, the position of the Malay rulers may no longer be relevant after this and the sovereignty of the rulers will surely be threatened. As a result, it will impact the status of Malays and Islam in Malaysia."

However, even  the Australian Government, which governs  a nation and system far more liberal than Malaysia, where there is no national religion and Queen Elizabeth II is, in effect,  head of state in name only;chose to define  its ratification of the Rome Statute with a number of express declarations: 
Australia's instrument of ratification includes a declaration affirming the primacy of Australia's criminal jurisdiction in relation to crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. It outlines the conditions under which a person in Australian custody or control would be surrendered to the Court and clarifies Australia's interpretation of the crimes within the Statute. The declaration has full effect in Australian law and is not a reservation. It reinforces safeguards already built into the Statute to preserve Australian sovereignty over our criminal jurisdiction.
While there can be argument as to the legal effect of the declarations, for practical purposes these statements by then Australian Prime Minister John Howard are instructive, and show how Wisma Putra and its legal advisers have been careless,in the context of Malaysia's unique religious and social framework:

Howard defends ICC decision

PRINT FRIENDLYEMAIL STORY

The World Today Archive - Thursday, 20 June , 2002  00:00:00

Reporter:

ELEANOR HALL: The Prime Minister has just emerged from the party room meeting we heard about a moment ago to speak to the media about the International Criminal Court.

Here's part of what he had to say:

JOHN HOWARD: I'm here with my colleagues to announce that the Government has decided to proceed to ratification of the International Criminal Court Statute. The decision has been reached after a very lengthy but beneficial and widespread consultation within the Government parties.

The decision to proceed to ratification will be accompanied by a number of very important and firm stipulations. At the time of ratification, Australia will deposit a declaration, which states a number of things, and I'll be releasing with my formal press statement a copy of this declaration.

The declaration will reaffirm the primacy of Australian law and the Australian legal system in relation to the prosecution of offences under the legislation giving affect to the statute. It will be declared that no person can be arrested on a warrant issued by the court, or surrendered to the court without the prior consent of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth.

It will also declare Australia's understanding that the offences of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes under the International Criminal Court Statute will be interpreted in accordance with Australian law. The matters in the declaration will be incorporated in the legislation, implementing our obligations under the International Criminal Court Statute. In other words, they will not be bear pious declarations, they will in fact become part of Australian law and therefore they will govern all behaviour in relation to Australian residence, or people in Australia, all within the control of Australia, such as example, our Defence Forces serving overseas, will remain completely subject to Australian law.

There's a further important stipulation that will be put in the enabling legislation and that is that no prosecution within Australia can be launched without prior consent of the Attorney General and indeed it must be launched in his or her name. That means effectively that the capacity for frivolous or vexatious private prosecution or interest prosecution can be stymied by the Attorney General taking them over and filing a no bill, according to his or her determination, of course of the merits of such prosecution. We believe that the International Criminal Court will make a valuable further addition to the efforts of the world to bring to justice people who perpetrate atrocious crimes, and it's in that spirit that Australia has decided to ratify.

REPORTER: Do you expect any of your colleagues to cross the floor?

JOHN HOWARD: Look, that's ultimately a matter for them. Let me put it this way – I was greatly encouraged, even warmed, by the response in the party room this morning. There are a number of my colleagues, as happens on a lot of things, will retain reservations about the Government's decision. But having seen an exhaustive and very democratic process of consultation used will support the decision.

END

Thursday, March 7, 2019

US DOJ continues to seize Najib's son Riza Aziz's assets; meanwhile in Malaysia.......

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Riza Admits He Stole 1MDB Money - Pays US$60 Million!
Riza Admits He Stole 1MDB Money - Pays US$60 Million!

While the Malaysian Government has yet to recover anything of significance from former PM Najib Razak and his family, the US Department Of Justice continues to identify and recover 1MDB linked  assets from  family members like step son Riza Aziz.

The US$ 60 Million settlement Riza and friends entered into with the DOJ in March last year (see Sarawak Report story above) does not seem to have stopped the DOJ from pursuing them for 1MDB linked assets.

In further action announced three weeks ago the DOJ announced that it had seized a further USD 38 Million in assets. See DOJ press release and documents below. Meanwhile in Malaysia Najib's 1MDB linked charges continue to be delayed,postponed and pushed on to no foreseeable conclusion.
END


References

First recall this report of a settlement in March 2018:

'Wolf of Wall Street' maker settles US lawsuit for $60 million  



Now see links at 

Excerpt from document at the last link 

  The defendants in this action are: (1) up to $28,174,145.52 in escrow account number ‘7176 held by escrow agent Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP at Huntington National Bank; 


(2) up to $1,148,739.35 in account number ‘6111 held in the name of Christopher Joey McFarland at Barclays Bank of Delaware; and 


(3) up to $162,486.88 in account number ‘9340 held in the name of Christopher Joey McFarland at Fidelity Investments, Inc., all of which being traceable to equity in COMPANY 1, a facilities management company headquartered in Newport, Kentucky (“DEFENDANT ASSETS”).


 3. The persons and entities whose interests may be affected by this action are Riza Shariz Bin Abdul AzizChristopher Joey McFarland,Nina Partners, LLC, Red Granite Investment Holdings, LLC, and Red Granite Pictures, LLC. 





InvolvingMalaysianSovereignWealthFund

Date 23/02/2019
http://www.mondovisione.com/media-and-resources/news/department-of-justice-us-seeks-to-recover-approximately-38-million-allegedly/?fbclid=IwAR1aLYJPBMg8ma_DE61xnG_glUGtztWHezepCac62aB7uEjYGu1kMZ4WuS4
The Justice Department announced today the filing of civil forfeiture complaints seeking the forfeiture and recovery of approximately $38 million in assets allegedly associated with an international conspiracy to launder funds misappropriated from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.  Combined with civil forfeiture complaints filed in July 2016 seeking more than $1 billion in assets, and civil forfeiture complaints filed in June 2017 seeking approximately $540 million in assets, this case represents the largest action brought under the Department’s Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative.  Assets now subject to forfeiture in this case total approximately $1.7 billion.
Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Nicola T. Hanna of the Central District of California, Assistant Director Robert Johnson of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division and Chief Don Fort of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) made the announcement.
According to the complaints, from 2009 through 2015, more than $4.5 billion in funds belonging to 1MDB were allegedly misappropriated by high-level officials of 1MDB and their associates.  1MDB was created by the government of Malaysia to promote economic development in Malaysia through global partnerships and foreign direct investment, and its funds were intended to be used for improving the well-being of the Malaysian people. 
“The complaints filed today demonstrate the Department of Justice’s steadfast commitment to recovering assets traceable to the alleged multi-billion dollar looting of Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund,” said Assistant Attorney General Benczkowski.  “The Criminal Division and our law enforcement partners are committed to protecting the U.S. financial system and ensuring that the proceeds of overseas corruption and other criminal conduct find no safe haven here.”
“These new lawsuits target assets collected by corrupt officials and their associates through a massive scheme that stole billions of dollars from the people of Malaysia and laundered the proceeds across the world,” said U.S. Attorney Nick Hanna.  “Through a series of cases filed over the past three years, we have pursued a wide variety of assets purchased with stolen 1MDB funds, and so far we have successfully forfeited hundreds of millions of dollars. Collectively, these cases send a strong message that the United States cannot be used as a safe haven or a conduit for money pilfered by corrupt officials.”
“Today’s announcement is a testament to the FBI’s relentless effort to investigate kleptocracy and hold corrupt foreign officials accountable,” said FBI Assistant Director Johnson.  “At the onset of this investigation, we promised to work with our foreign and domestic partners to identify and return stolen assets to the Malaysian people.  This filing demonstrates our unwavering commitment to keep that promise.  We want to thank our partners, both domestic and foreign, for their hard work in helping to bring justice for the Malaysian people.  The recovery of these assets is another step in that direction.”
“The investigation into the misappropriation of the 1MDB funds represents a model for international cooperation in significant cross-border money laundering matters, and sends a message that criminals cannot evade law enforcement authorities simply by laundering money through multiple jurisdictions and through a web of shell corporations,” said IRS-CI Chief Fort.  “We are proud of the investigative work on this case and the work of our fellow law enforcement agencies in this and other complex financial investigations.”
As alleged in the complaints, the members of the conspiracy – which included officials at 1MDB, their relatives and other associates – diverted more than $4.5 billion in 1MDB funds.  Using fraudulent documents and representations, the co-conspirators allegedly laundered the funds through a series of complex transactions and shell companies with bank accounts located in the U.S. and abroad.  These transactions allegedly served to conceal the origin, source and ownership of the funds, and ultimately passed through U.S. financial institutions to then be used to acquire and invest in assets located in the U.S. and overseas.
As alleged in the earlier complaints, in 2009, 1MDB officials and their associates embezzled approximately $1 billion that was supposed to be invested to exploit energy concessions purportedly owned by a foreign partner.  Instead, the funds were allegedly transferred through shell companies and were used to acquire a number of assets, as set forth in the complaints.  The complaints also allege that the co-conspirators misappropriated close to $1.4 billion in funds raised through bond offerings in 2012, and more than $1.2 billion following another bond offering in 2013.  The complaints also allege that in 2014, the co-conspirators misappropriated approximately $850 million in 1MDB funds under the guise of repurchasing certain options that had been given in connection with a guarantee of the 2012 bonds.
The complaints filed today in the Central District of California identify additional assets traceable to the 2012 and 2013 bond offerings.  These assets include luxury real estate in London, proceeds from the sale of luxury real estate in New York City, and converted equity in a facilities management company headquartered in Kentucky.    
The FBI’s International Corruption Squads in New York City and Los Angeles and the IRS-CI are investigating the case.  Deputy Chief Woo S. Lee and Trial Attorneys Kyle R. Freeny, Jonathan Baum, Barbara Levy and Joshua L. Sohn of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys John Kucera and Michael R. Sew Hoy of the Central District of California are prosecuting the case.  The Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs is providing substantial assistance.
The Department also appreciates the significant assistance provided by the Attorney General’s Chambers of Malaysia, the Royal Malaysian Police, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, the Attorney General’s Chambers of Singapore, the Singapore Police Force-Commercial Affairs Division, the Office of the Attorney General and the Federal Office of Justice of Switzerland, the judicial investigating authority of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and the Criminal Investigation Department of the Grand-Ducal Police of Luxembourg.
The Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative is led by a team of dedicated prosecutors in the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, in partnership with federal law enforcement agencies, and often with U.S. Attorney’s Offices, to forfeit the proceeds of foreign official corruption and, where appropriate, to use those recovered assets to benefit the people harmed by these acts of corruption and abuse of office.  In 2015, the FBI formed International Corruption Squads across the country to address national and international implications of foreign corruption.  Individuals with information about possible proceeds of foreign corruption located in or laundered through the U.S. should contact federal law enforcement or send an email to kleptocracy@usdoj.gov (link sends e-mail) or https://tips.fbi.gov/.
A civil forfeiture complaint is merely an allegation that money or property was involved in or represents the proceeds of a crime.  These allegations are not proven until a court awards judgment in favor of the United States.

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Is KWAP's RM 4 Billion seized by Singapore hostage to Malaysia-Singapore Water Agreement negotiations?

by Ganesh Sahathevan


This writer has previously reported that the Singapore-Malaysia water agreements are not sustainable (see story copied and pasted below).

In the past few weeks Singapore ministers have had much to say about the water agreements.For example the Straits Times reported:

Singapore will fully honour the terms of the 1962 Water Agreement with Malaysia, including the price of water stipulated in it, and expects Malaysia also to do so, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on Monday (July 9).

Responding in Parliament to a question about bilateral relations with Malaysia, Dr Balakrishnan said the 1962 deal is "not an ordinary agreement".

"The 1962 Water Agreement was guaranteed by both Singapore and Malaysia in the 1965 Separation Agreement, which in turn was registered with the United Nations," he said.

"Any breach of the 1962 Water Agreement would call into question the Separation Agreement, which is the basis for Singapore's very existence as an independent sovereign state."

Water has been in the spotlight in recent weeks as an issue that could affect bilateral ties, after Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad criticised the water supply deal between Singapore and his country, saying the price at which water is sold to the Republic is "ridiculous".

An agreement signed between Singapore and Malaysia in 1962 allows Singapore to draw up to 250 million gallons of raw water from Johor daily at three sen (1.01 Singapore cents) per 1,000 gallons.

The Minister also said:

While Malaysia’s investigations into the 1MDB issue have intensified following its general election, Singapore has been thoroughly investigating 1MDB-related offences committed in Singapore since 2015, he noted.

Singapore has taken firm action against institutions and individuals, including criminal prosecutions, shut down two banks and fined others for regulatory breaches, and jailed and fined individuals convicted on 1MDB-linked charges.

“So far, we are the only jurisdiction to have done so. We have, in addition, cooperated fully with Malaysia’s official requests for information on 1MDB-related transactions,” he said.


However, Singapore has yet to say much about this very large billion dollar 1MDB issue:


In 2011, the former 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) subsidiary took a RM4.385 billion loan from KWAP at an interest rate of between 4.3% and 5.1% per year to fund strategic overseas investments in energy resources.

The total repayment period is 10 years, which would see interest servicing in the first five years of the loan, while the remaining five years would see the interest and principal paid up.

Last November, former second finance minister Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani admitted that SRC was in financial difficulty due to problems it faced in recovering money it had deposited in BSI Bank's branch in Singapore.
This came after Singapore authorities shut down the bank's operations for breaching money laundering regulations in a development allegedly linked to 1MDB.

The above raised the obvious question: Is Singapore using that billion or more as a  bargaining chip in the ongoing disagreement over the water agreements?


This would not be the first occasion in which Singapore has used money owed Malaysia and Malaysians as a bargaining chip.Readers may recall this issue from the 1990s:

Veteran observers on both sides of the Causeway view it as representing a psychological breakthrough in the way the two countries approach contentious issues between them. Malaysia had accepted the fact of Singapore’s sovereignty over the railway land while Singapore had acknowledged Malaysia’s entitlement to some economic value for the railway land and stations that KTM had to give up. The agreement to relocate the KTM Station to Woodlands within a year has opened up the possibility of a resolution to other outstanding issues, if approached with the same spirit. These include the price of water supply from Johor to Singapore and the withdrawal of CPF savings by Malaysian workers and use of Malaysian airspace by the Singapore Air Force.

END



















Thursday, February 11, 2016


Singapore ,1 MDB,a change of leadership & the water agreements: A public admission from Singapore that the water agreements are not sustainable


by Ganesh Sahathevan
In this post earlier in the week evidence was provided to show that the Singapore-Malaysia water agreements will need to reviewed, regardless of any arrangement the Government of Singapore may come to with  Najib Razak, the 65 year old  current prime minister of Malaysia.\:


It has since come to this writer's attention that the issues raised in the above post had in fact been aired via  the Government owned and controlled Straits Times ,where the public have been warned :

The heavy rain and subsequent floods in Johor Baru are in a different catchment area from the Linggiu Reservoir, which is further upstream. While there has been some rain in the Linggiu Reservoir catchment, the water levels remain largely the same, at around 43 per cent.
In photos posted last Friday( November 13,2015, on the Facebook page of Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli  )  the water level at the Linggiu Reservoir was shown to have dropped significantly. 

In photos posted last Friday, the water level at the Linggiu Reservoir was shown to have dropped significantly.


The water level at the reservoir is at its lowest due to low rainfall and this in turn impacts how much Singapore can draw from the Johor River. Singapore can tap 250 million gallons of water a day from the river, which can meet up to 60 per cent of the country's needs.

PUB said that from January to last month, there were about 100 times when Singapore was temporarily unable to withdraw water from the river .


Last week, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli said if the situation does not improve, more may have to be done to conserve water. This includes restricting, for the first time, the use of water for non-essential activities such as washing cars and operating water fountains.


(See full story below).


The probability that Singapore is trying to do what it can to ignore the 1 MDB scandal in order to secure its future supply of water via some agreement with Najib Razak, as foolhardy as that may seem, is greater given this admission.Readers are reminded that the Government of Singapore has for more than a decade boasted that it is self-sufficient with regards its need for water.
This Straits Times headline from 2014 is but one example:

Saying goodbye to water woes-Treated used water is helping Singapore achieve near self-sufficiency


END 






Monday's two-hour downpour which caused massive floods in parts of Johor Baru has done little to raise historically low water levels in the Linggiu Reservoir - a key cog in Singapore's water supply.
National water agency PUB said it will continue to monitor the situation closely, and Singaporeans will be told early if there is a need to restrict water use here.
"The heavy rain and subsequent floods in JB are in a different catchment area from the Linggiu Reservoir, which is further upstream," a PUB spokesman told The Straits Times yesterday. "While there has been some rain in the Linggiu Reservoir catchment, the water levels remain largely the same, at around 43 per cent."
The water level at the reservoir is at its lowest due to low rainfall and this in turn impacts how much Singapore can draw from the Johor River. Singapore can tap 250 million gallons of water a day from the river, which can meet up to 60 per cent of the country's needs.
PUB said that from January to last month, there were about 100 times when Singapore was temporarily unable to withdraw water from the river .

In photos posted last Friday, the water level at the Linggiu Reservoir was shown to have dropped significantly.
In photos posted last Friday, the water level at the Linggiu Reservoir was shown to have dropped significantly. FACEBOOK PAGE OF MASAGOS ZULKIFLI
LITTLE RAIN IN CATCHMENT
The heavy rain and subsequent floods in Johor Baru are in a different catchment area from the Linggiu Reservoir, which is further upstream. While there has been some rain in the Linggiu Reservoir catchment, the water levels remain largely the same, at around 43 per cent.
PUB SPOKESMAN
Last week, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli said if the situation does not improve, more may have to be done to conserve water. This includes restricting, for the first time, the use of water for non-essential activities such as washing cars and operating water fountains.
Senior research fellow Cecilia Tortajada, from the Institute of Water Policy at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, said that if the reservoir water levels do not improve by next month despite the north-east monsoon, which is expected to set in then, such restrictions may have to kick in.
"It would send a clear message to the population that there is a limit to how much water is available and that it needs to be conserved, even after the monsoon season starts," she said, pointing out that many cities around the world enforce water restrictions during the dry season.
The reservoir was built in 1994 by Singapore. It keeps sea water out of the Johor River by releasing water into it. This ensures that the river water is not too salty to be treated by the Singapore-run treatment plant there.
PUB has been running desalination and Newater plants at high capacity to keep local reservoir stocks healthy. Currently, Singapore's four Newater plants can meet up to 30 per cent of the nation's water needs. PUB hopes to expand this to 55 per cent by 2060. PUB also aims to build two more desalination plants. Currently, desalination or treated sea water can meet up to 25 per cent of Singapore's needs.
Professor Asit Biswas, distinguished visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, said Singapore needs to think seriously about developing a long-term, drought-resistance plan.
With climate change and multi-year droughts in countries like Australia, there is a very high probability that the region may be hit by a prolonged multi-year drought within the next two to four decades, and not just one lasting a few months, he said.
He also added that Singaporeans may have taken a reliable water supply for granted, pointing out that water-rationing last took place here from April 1963 to February 1964.
Prof Biswas said: "More than a generation has now grown up without having faced a serious drought needing water-rationing."