Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Top Group and iFlytek: Can DanTehan and his University Foreign Interference Taskforce provide any assurance that Top Group students are not being surveilled, and that they will not be victimised like UQ's Drew Pavlou?

by Ganesh Sahathevan


It has been previously reported on this blog that Zhu Minshen and his Top Group entered into a commercial arrangement with iFlytek, a company that has been blacklisted by the US Government, given its part in the persecution of Uyghurs.  It was also reported that iFlytek technicians have been at Top Group's premises in Sydney, to install equipment. 


iFlytek has a joint laboratory with the Department of Electronic Engineering at Tsinghua University. The department has a long history of developing speech and speaker recognition for automated telephone surveillance, and is a major player in the Golden Shield Project, the Ministry of Public Security’s ambitious plan to bolster and broaden surveillance using technology.
iFlytek also has a range of commercial text-to-speech and speech recognition applications for mobile phones, including a voice assistance app for Android phones in China. The company states it has 890 million users, which would provide a large speech data set that can be used to train and improve its speech recognition software for a range of purposes, potentially including surveillance.
It is unclear to what extent iFlytek shares the personal information it collects for commercial purposes with the Ministry of Public Security. While iFlytek promises confidentiality in its customer privacy statement, it also says that it may disclose personal information “according to the demands of the relevant government departments.” China’s Cybersecurity Law requires companies to provide undefined “technical support” to security agencies to aid in investigations, and provides no privacy protections against state surveillance. iFlytek is not required to inform users of government information requests, for example.
The Australian Minister for Education Dan Tehan has announced that his University Foreign Interference Taskforce. 
The case of UQ student Drew Pavlou has shown that China can and has surveilled local students.Against that backdrop, it is curious that neither Minister Tehan nor his Taskforce have indicated any action with regards iFlytek and Top Education.
Their seeming lack of interest is surprising given that Huawei  has joined forces "with iFlytek for consumer voice recognition".


Siew Ting Tan McKeogh, NSW LPAB Executive Officer who oversaw the review of Zhu Minshen & Top Group's license to grant LLB degrees was replaced soon after renewal of that license: NSW LPAB Chair Tom Bathurst maintains silence despite controversy surrounding Zhu and Top

by Ganesh Sahathevan


As Chief Justice Tom Bathurst has been intent on pursuing a social 
and political agenda. In doing so he has walked into a matter
of national security.In doing so he seems to have neglected his actual duties. 


Siew Ting Tan McKeogh, the NSW LPAB Executive Officer who oversaw  the review  of Zhu Minshen and  Top Group's license to grant LB degrees,  has been replaced after just eight or so months on the job. 

 She was replaced soon after the  review was successfully completed, and signed off on 29 June 2019, just one day before the end of  the financial year. That fortuitous timing allowed Zhu to report in his year end financial reports that his review "went smoothly" .  

The timing also saved the  NSW LPAB from having to report any delay , exception or qualification to that review. The NSW LPAB were able to do so despite the adverse media reports against Zhu and Top Group. 


The Chairman of the NSW LPAB , Chief Justice Tom Bathurst, has maintained his silence despite the controversy surrounding Zhu. 


TO BE READ WITH


Friday, September 27, 2019

Zhu Minshen announces that NSW LPAB review "went smoothly": AG NSW Mark Speakman and officers unconcerned by Clive Hamilton's disclosures of threats, intimidation and defiance of AFP directives ,share price collapse

by Ganesh Sahathevan



The LPAB''s tick of approval does not seem to have reversed the downward trend in share price.Indeed it does look as if the LPAB has ignored all together the fact that Top's market capitalisation has collapsed since listing. Note that Top's shareprice has fallen 14.29% over the past month,compared to 1.13% for the overall market as measured by the Hang Seng Index

In the words of Zhu Minshen, chairman and CEO of his Top Education Group Ltd:



Bachelor of Law Re-accreditation 

The scheduled re-accreditation process of our Bachelor of Laws (‘‘LLB’’) went smoothly. On 27 June 2019, TOP received formal notification from the Legal Profession Admission Board of New South Wales (‘‘LPAB’’) to accredit TOP’s LLB for a further five-year period commencing from the notification date.
(TOP EDUCATION GROUP LTD
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ANNUAL RESULTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019)




All this despite the revelations of open defiance of an AFP directive, threats and intimidation disclosed in Clive Hamilton's "Silent Invasion",which have been previously reported on this blog:

In his 2018 book "Silent Invasion" Professor Clive Hamilton reports that Top Education Group's Zhu Minshen organised  students , including students from his Top Education Institute to protest  against Tibetans at the  2008 rally , which counted towards the Top students’ assessment.  Zhu’s Top Institution is “perhaps the only accredited degree program in Australia that counts agitating for a foreign power towards its qualifications.”


Hamilton provides details of Zhu's Communist Party China antecedents and his organisation of the 30,000 strong demonstration by Chinese students at the Canberra torch relay, many of them brandishing Chinese flags.

This was clearly an open challenge to the authority , and in public defiance  of, the AFP's directive to Chinese government security that they were not to be involved in the torch relay. As Hamilton puts is "ASIO shat themselves".

Despite this open defiance of the law that they are meant to defend and uphold the Attorney General NSW Mark Speakman and the other senior judicial officers at the LPAB determined that an exception should  be made to allow Zhu to operate the "first and only" law school in Australia that is not part of a university.


END 

See Also 



Law Council Australia 's exception for Zhu Minshen despite Law Council declaring China's justice system "a joke"






Posted by at 5:37 AM 


Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Australia spent FOUR TIMES MORE than necessary to save 14,000 lives: Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy has revealed economy crushing lockdown saved about FOUR TIMES LESS the number expected

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Australia's Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy says modelling shows social distancing and hygiene measures are 'flattening the curve'.

Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy seems confused by numbers, to a point where he is slowly but surely revealing his poor errors



Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy has been reported telling a Senate Inquiry: 
If we had their (the UK's) death rate and outcomes , we would've had about 14,000 deaths in Australia, not just over 100........ so I think we have done well, we are in a very cautious phase now of trying to move to a living-with-COVID economy."
Based on Murphy's advise the Morrison Government put the economy into lockdown, at a cost to taxpayers of between AUD 200-AUD 300 Billion. Morrison's DPMC's Value Of Statistical Life Guidelines provide that the government can spend about $4.2 Million to save a life. The government does not have a blank cheque, contrary to popular belief.

Rounded up to $ 5 Million taxpayers would have expected that the government intended that  40,000-60,000 lives needed to be saved. 
Saving 14,000 lives should have cost approximately $ 70 Billion, which is THREE TO FOUR TIMES LESS than what has been incurred. 
Put in another way, the number of lives that needed saving was just above FOUR TIMES LESS than budgeted. 

For all this, the person who must bear blame is Brendan Murphy. As reported on this blog, in early to mid January when he should have acted but did nothing, Murphy seemed more interested in playing at being human rights commissioner.

He seems to have then been over-cautious in his advice to government, causing a loss to taxpayers of more than $130 Billion to $ 180 Billion. The cost to the economy as a whole is far greater, and still being tallied. 


TO BE READ WITH



Monday, April 6, 2020


Australia's COVID 19 policies based on modelling that ignores financial costs -Govt seems clueless as to how many lives will be saved in relation to its economy crushing policies

by Ganesh Sahathevan



Australia's Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy says modelling shows social distancing and hygiene measures are 'flattening the curve'.
Australia's Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy says modelling shows social distancing and hygiene measures are "flattening the curve". Source: AAP
Murphy has recommended policies intended to limit community contagion, but in January insisted that there was little if any risk of community contagion in Australia.

The Australian Government has at least released the modelling that is guiding its COVID 19/Wuhan Virus response, which has  caused the economy to  collapse. 

As before, the modelling makes no mention about the benefits to the whole of the population in the long term. The Government seems to have ignored its own cost guidelines, set out on the  Department Of Prime Minister And Cabinet website, which effectively value an Australian life, on average, at $4.2 Million.

It does now seem as if the Government has allowed itself to spend as much it wants, without any regard to the number of lives that might actually be saved.

END











TO BE READ WITH


Is an Australian life still worth AUD 4.2 Million? Forced shuttering of businesses, massive job losses, loss of wealth implies life is now worth less; Morrison Govt duty bound to ask taxpayers first before spending another cent on its Wuhan Virus stimulus



March 29, 2020






by Ganesh Sahathevan



                                          Even the ABC is worried that things have changed 
                                          forever


An Australian life is worth $4.2 Million. That is the value of a statistical life, or the offical rate that guides Government policy in for example, the cost  of the stimulus and other measures that the Morrison Government is implementing to manage the economic impact of its Wuhan Virus/Covid-19 mitigation measures.


The concept is summarised on the Commonwealth Department Of Prime Minister And Cabinet 
website:


Key Points:

• Willingness to pay is the appropriate way to estimate the value of reductions in the risk of physical harm – known as the value of statistical life.


• Based on international and Australian research a credible estimate of the value of statistical life is $4.2m and the value of statistical life year is $182 000 in 2014 dollars.


• There are complicating assumptions used to derive these estimates so a sensitivity analysis should be undertaken as part of the cost-benefit analysis.


Based on the above , it can be roughly estimated that Australians are prepared to pay, or rather let their government pay on their behalf, say $420 Billion to save 100,000 lives. This is the estimate that the Government ought to be relying on to determine the size of its Covid 19 economic and health package.

However, the Australian Government led by Scott Morrison has imposed on the country what is in effect a ban on trade, which it refers to as "hibernation".
In real terms there has been a forced shuttering of businesses, massive job losses and generally a loss of wealth. Consequently it is likely that the willingness to pay is now less than that $4.2 Million.
Put in another way, the ability to pay has fallen drastically, and that is more likely than not to have adversely affected the willingness to pay.

The  Morrison Government is  duty bound to ask taxpayers first before spending another cent on its Wuhan Virus stimulus. and on the health measures.

END




60,000 lives saved in the present time: Morrison Government's likely estimate of lives saved by his lockdown may be an acceptable lossApril 02, 2020
by Ganesh Sahathevan



Morrison seems to be speaking of lockdowns of three, six, twelve months and more as if Australians
have an infinite capacity to pay



The Morrison Government's $265 Billion stimulus package may be based on the premise that Australian are prepared to spend $ 4.2 Million each, on average, to save an additional life.
(see explanation below).


The workings are straight forward, but Morrison has not been prepared to state the number.
Meanwhile, despite the stimulus, earnings from work and business are evaporating; when that happens the value of life is likely to decline.

When that happens Australians will  the expect  number of lives saves to be higher; so for example if the value of life falls to $2.1 Million, Australians would expect 120,000 lives to be saved. Anything less would be considered an acceptable loss.

Additionally, the the cost to the taxpayer may well be in excess of the $ 265 Billion stimulus for despite the stimulus earnings from work and business are evaporating.
Here again, a loss of 60,00 lives among those who are older or have underlying conditions would be considered an acceptable loss.

What is or is not an acceptable loss is a decision for us to make, not the Prime Minister and his " war time" Cabinet. Ultimately it a decision for taxpayers, not the PM and his Government.

END


Malaysian experience suggests Victoria will incur debt, gain no jobs, as a result of Andrews Govt Belt&Road debt deal-Andrew Robb's ChAFTA exemption for Chinese workers on Chinese projects will be to blame

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Premier Daniel Andrews and Chinese Ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye in Melbourne who are both holding compendiums.
Mr Andrews said the deal was all about growing jobs.(Supplied: Chinese Embassy)



Malaysians will find this statement by the Premier Of Victoria, Daniel Andrews familiar:
"I'm not going to apologise for a (Belt&Road) trade policy that is all about growing Victorian jobs."

These were of course the type of words that former PM Najib Razak relied on when trying to justify his China backed East Coast Rail Link project, which Malaysians later discovered was nothing more than a cover-up for the 1MDB theft.

Malaysians were to also discover that the project would not create jobs for locals; Chinese labour was to be used because of apparent language requirements. 

Australian workers are not protected from an onslaught of Chinese workers. Andrew Robb's ChAFTA only requires that employers make "genuine efforts" to seek local workers.

In short, Victorians  can look forward to higher debt, and a few if any new jobs once the Andrews Government finalises its Belt&Road deal.

END





Monday, May 25, 2020

NSW AG and premier in waiting Mark Speakman is part of the problem of racism; his anti-racism campaign is part of a regime that considers blacks, browns, coloureds like house pets, who are expected to show servility in exchange for demonstrations of affection and protection.

by Ganesh Sahathevan


NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman/A screenshot of a poster from the state government's anti-racism campaign
NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman/A screenshot of a poster from the state government's anti-racism campaign Source: SBS News


The latest from the Attorney General Of NSW Mark Speakman, who is considered a potential premier of NSW in the near future: 


The New South Wales government has launched a public awareness campaign to help victims of racially-fuelled threats and abuse understand their legal rights.
The Stop Public Threats campaign, launched on Monday night, includes promotional posters bearing the slogan: "public threats against some of us, a problem for all of us".
NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman said he hoped it would encourage people to report threats of race-related violence to the police for investigation.
“A criminal law was introduced in 2018 in NSW. It makes it a criminal offence to threaten or incite violence on the basis of someone’s race, religion, gender sexuality,” he said.
“We need to work together to combat abusive and violent behaviour that discriminates against cultural or religious groups as well as other sections of our community.”
The problem for those of us that Speakman seeks to protect is this: in real terms protection is not available to any black or coloured who dares assert any right against Speakman and friends. Coloured Catholics for example, will not be heard. And any black or coloured who dares even think of questioning the regime that gives Speakman his power and privilege will be condemned.  Put in another way, Speakman and his ilk think of blacks and coloured as if they are household pets, who must remain obedient if they want to be protected. That protection is supposed to justify anything, including attempts to mislead Asian buyers of the Australian legal services.
END 

Sunday, May 24, 2020

Australian private equity with Chinese investors must be subject to the same scrutiny applied to the Kerry Packer-Conrad Black Tourang Consortium in the nineties :Albert Tse's Wattle Hill's Capilano Honey takeover a case in point

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Albert Tse, Capilano CEO Ben McKee and Roc managing partner
Mike Lukin at the Capilano Honey headquarters in Brisbane.
Picture: Glenn Hunt,The Australian



FIRB chief David Irvine and former ASIO boss Dennis Richardson have insisted that the Australian Government's scrutiny of Chinese investment in Australian assets is strong, robust and naturally "the best in the world".
However, these best in the world processes do not apply to acquisitions by Australian private equity firms, even when the firms investors are primarily foreign. Albert Tse's Wattle Hill, which led the takeover of Capilano Honey, is a good example.

As stated on its website: 

Wattle Hill RHC established its Australian fund in March 2016 with two of the largest insurance groups from China and Europe, as well as family-office investors from China’s leading private e-commerce and FMCG companies. Wattle Hill RHC’s Investment Committee includes one of Australia’s most respected investors, Ashok Jacob of Ellerston Capital, and Sean Huang of Riverhead Capital, the private equity arm of Sunshine Insurance Group, one of China’s largest privately-owned insurance groups with over 35 million direct policy holders.​


The Australian profile of Tse and Wattle Hill says: 

Tse is building up his own private equity firm, Wattle Hill Capital, with the backing of several wealthy Chinese families. This has involved buying a stake in ASX-listed infant formula company Bubs and a takeover last year of the Capilano Honey company. Wattle Hill’s ­advisers include Kerry Packer’s former right-hand man Ashok Jacob and former NSW premier Nick Greiner; co-investors in the deal include Kerry Stokes’ family — ties that date back to Albert’s days working with Macquarie Bank in Beijing.


The Capilano Honey takeover was not subject to FIRB scrutiny, that is the law. However, scrutiny of takeovers of Australian assets by foreign funded private equity firms has happened before. The case of  the  House of Reps Select Committee on Print Media (4/11/91), better known as the parliamentary inquiry into the Packer-Conrad Black Tourang Consortium takeover of Fairfax is a good example.

Public sentiment today demands that acquisitions such as that of Capilano Honey by Albert Tse's Wattle Hill be subject to the same type of scrutiny.



TO BE READ WITH 

Power players


How Kevin Rudd’s daughter and her Hong Kong-born husband built a business empire on Chinese connections.


By GLENDA KORPORAAL
Jessica Rudd and Albert Tse in Shanghai. Picture: Daniele Mattioli

From The Weekend Australian Magazine
February 22, 2019
12 MINUTE READ
69


In his book Not for the Faint-hearted, Kevin Rudd recalls the moment he stood on stage, a freshly minted prime minister after the 2007 landslide election, his ­family by his side, and how one “factional operative from the right” said later that evening: “We need to fix the Asian problem with the first family.” Asked about this now, his daughter Jessica laughs. “Do they mean my husband or my children?”

All these years later there’s still interest in this power marriage between ­Jessica, the only daughter of the former PM, and Albert Tse, the Hong Kong-born son of a Malaysian Chinese businessman. “In China, people who don’t know my background ask how I, a Chinese guy, could get the prime minister’s daughter,” Tse says. “They had never seen a Chinese guy become a ­son-in-law to a first family in a modern Western democracy. I tell them when I first met her, Kevin was not prime minister. I always joke about it. I tell them I didn’t get her, she got me.”

The pair first met in Brisbane as a result of their mutual concern at the rise of Pauline Hanson’s anti-Asian One Nation party. It was the year 2000; Tse was 21, studying at university, and Rudd was 16, still at high school. She had formed a group protesting against Hansonism, while Tse joined the Labor Party and did volunteer work for his local Labor MP, Kevin Rudd. “It was scary times,” he recalls. “You had a party which was not very fond of people who looked like me which almost had the balance of power in a one-house parliament in Queensland. That’s when I became active in politics and joined the Labor Party.”




Tse, who taught himself English after arriving in Brisbane with his family in 1988 at the age of 10, was surprised to find his local member had an interest in China. “Kevin could speak Mandarin, which was quite cool,” he says. “I could only speak Cantonese at the time.”

Through their volunteer electorate work, ­Jessica and Albert kept bumping into each and their relationship grew. In May 2007, when Jessica was 23, they married at an Anglican church in Brisbane on an unusually hot day with television cameras outside as Opposition leader Rudd walked his daughter down the aisle.
Former PM Kevin Rudd, wife Therese Rein, daughter Jessica, granddaughter Josephine and son-in-law Albert Tse at the ALP campaign launch in Brisbane, 2013. Picture: AP /Tertius Pickard

Fast forward to 2019 and Rudd and Tse are the parents of two young children, now based back in Brisbane after stints in London and Beijing and five months in Shanghai last year, a global life with growing business interests between Australia and China. Brought together by a shared anger at the state of politics, they have abandoned any thoughts of direct political involvement, working instead to raise their family and build what has the potential to be a significant business combining online shopping with investing using their unique mix of Australia-China connections.

Jessica is an Australian ambassador for ­Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, selling Australian products into China through an online shop called Jessica’s ­Suitcase. A merger in train between the ­Jessica’s Suitcase group (now folded into ASX-listed eCargo) and the Chinese arm of Australian wholesaler Metcash will allow the business to expand from online sales of Australian products into China to bricks and mortar stores across the country with the combined backing of Jessica and Albert’s connections as well as the sourcing power of Metcash.
Albert Tse, Capilano CEO Ben McKee and Roc managing partner Mike Lukin at the Capilano Honey headquarters in Brisbane. Picture: Glenn Hunt

At the same time, Tse is building up his own private equity firm, Wattle Hill Capital, with the backing of several wealthy Chinese families. This has involved buying a stake in ASX-listed infant formula company Bubs and a takeover last year of the Capilano Honey company. Wattle Hill’s ­advisers include Kerry Packer’s former right-hand man Ashok Jacob and former NSW premier Nick Greiner; co-investors in the deal include Kerry Stokes’ family — ties that date back to Albert’s days working with Macquarie Bank in Beijing.

While the Australia-China political relationship has been strained in recent years, the Tse/Rudds have forged a thriving business developing their own connections among China’s young newly rich as well as some older hands. For those who care to look, the couple have many common strands in their family backgrounds. Both have parents with a strong entrepreneurial drive. Jessica’s mother Thérèse Rein founded a government contracting business, Ingeus, helping the long-term unemployed find work, expanding from Australia to the UK and Asia, while Tse’s father Bob founded a Hong Kong packaging business that was the basis for a business visa that allowed his family to move to Australia. Both families have lived in Hong Kong and the mainland and share a common love of ­Brisbane as a place to bring up children.

Tse is happy for his wife to have the spotlight, although his business interests are beginning to attract attention in Australian business circles. And they have made an impressive list of contacts among China’s newly wealthy. “If you’re not in the Tse family Sino/Australian Rolodexes, it’s pretty likely that you are dead or, even worse, irrelevant,” says Sydney businesswoman Gabrielle Trainor, an adviser to Wattle Hill who has known the couple for more than a decade since being introduced by a mutual friend just after Rudd became PM. “Albert switches smoothly and easily from the ­traditional Chinese approach to seniority to the more informal Australian business style,” she says.

I meet Tse in the coffee shop of The Opposite House, a funky upmarket hotel in Beijing’s ­Sanlitun designer shopping district. It has a popular bar where Tse recalls the Rudd family and the Turnbull family meeting in happier times some years ago for a drink to celebrate the engagement of Malcolm Turnbull’s son Alex to Hong Kong-born Yvonne Wang, whose family has high-level connections in China. “I went shopping with Kevin, to buy them an engagement present,” Tse recalls. Asked what he thinks of the Turnbulls these days, Tse’s anger is palpable. He thinks about making a comment, barely restrains himself, and says through tight lips: “Ask Jessica.” The Rudd family has never forgiven Turnbull for not supporting Kevin Rudd’s bid for secretary ­general of the United Nations.

It was Kevin’s rapidly rising political career that prompted them to leave Australia and set out on a global career path. “We made a decision that win, lose or draw with the [2007] election, we needed to get out of there,” Jessica says. “I was thinking about working in communications. But if I had stayed there everything would have been through the prism of what my father was doing. It was not how we wanted to start our married life together.”

In early 2008 they signed a lease on a flat in London’s Notting Hill. Jessica started working in crisis communications for Hill and Knowlton while Albert eventually worked with Macquarie Bank specialising in infrastructure financing, making the big shift to higher-end investment banking. But the couple’s enthusiasm for living in London faded as the global financial crisis hit. Albert was offered a job in Macquarie’s Beijing office so the couple moved to the Chinese capital in 2009. While the economies in the West were suffering from the GFC, China’s was taking off.

Despite his Chinese heritage, it was not an easy start for Albert in Beijing. When they arrived, ­Jessica had more Mandarin than he did, from her school studies in Brisbane. “Chinese ­people would congratulate me for being able to say ‘Ni hao’ while they would look critically at Albert even if he delivered a complicated sentence in Mandarin,” Jessica recalls. “It was difficult,” Albert agrees. “I had a few months of part-time ­lessons. But I just had to dive in. We were working on a lot of big deals involving state-owned enterprises. There is not a lot of English spoken in the SOEs. When you have clients that don’t speak English, you learn Mandarin quite quickly.”

One of the biggest deals he worked on was the listing of the Agricultural Bank of China on the Hong Kong and Shanghai stock exchanges in 2010. It was the world’s biggest ever initial public offering, raising more than $US22 billion. The job gave him a box seat for meeting a new generation of Chinese ­business people as well as influential foreigners looking to invest in China. The fact that he was married to the daughter of the Australian prime minister didn’t hurt, either. The deal gave Albert a connection with the Stokes family, which invested in the Chinese bank IPO, and allowed him to meet Chinese entrepreneurs making their fortune in online businesses, such as Alibaba founder Jack Ma. Albert’s contact list began to grow. He was often invited to dinners by Chinese friends who were entertaining high-powered ­people passing through the capital. “Beijing is such a happening place. I would get these phone calls in the afternoon saying, ‘Hey. We have a dinner on tonight. Do you mind coming?’”

With Albert working in investment banking and studying Mandarin, Jessica found herself at home with a lot of time on her hands. On the ­urging of her mother she decided to write a novel, turning to her friend from their London days, author Kathy Lette, for advice. “She said, ‘If you want to write a novel you have to write what you know’,” she says. “I knew politics and I knew about being laid off from investment banking. It was around me every day. So I came up with something that was political chick lit.” From a Japanese wine bar in Beijing, Rudd wrote her first novel, Campaign Ruby, about a young British woman who is laid off from investment banking in London, comes to Australia and gets involved in a political campaign.
Jessica Rudd with her parents at the launch of her first book in 2010. Picture: Lyndon Mecheilsen

The book was already at the printers but its release was rushed when she heard the news that her father was being ousted from his job by ­former deputy Julia Gillard. “It came out immediately after the coup. The 24th of June 2010. We had to fast-track it.” Some commentators described its observations of the dog-eat-dog world of Australian politics as “a little too uncanny”.

She followed up with a second book, Ruby Blues, in October 2011, while she was pregnant with their first child. Josie was born in May 2012, and having a baby in China changed their lives. When they flew back home they would stock up on baby goods they couldn’t get in China. “We would arrive back from Australia overloaded with baby oil, nappy rash cream…” Soon her friends with young children wanted to try them. “My friends in Beijing who were mums would come over and nick my stuff,” she says. After bringing back more goods from Australia for themselves and their friends they realised there was a demand in China for Australian products.

Jessica had witnessed the rise of online shopping in China first hand as couriers would appear regularly in their apartment building, dropping off so many goods that the doormen would get angry. A work friend of Albert’s put them in contact with ­Alibaba, the rising star in China’s e-commerce world. At Alibaba’s headquarters in Hangzhou, south of Shanghai, Jessica was introduced to ­Maggie Zhou, one of Alibaba’s first employees, who had a strong interest in Australia. “They very kindly walked me around,” Jessica recalls. “I was flabbergasted at the vastness of it and how sophisticated it was. There was a two-storey screen with live data projected onto it. It was a map of the world showing parcels being flung around like ping pong balls. I was just so blown away by it. I thought, whatever happens next, I want to be part of it.”

So Jessica became a retailer, establishing an online store selling goods on Alibaba’s TMall global platform. She set up the business with a friend, Chantelle Ye, an investment banker and fellow new mum. They called the store Jessica’s Suitcase, after all those suitcase runs bringing ­Australian goods to friends in China.

After their second child, McLean, was born in December 2015, the couple decided to move back to Brisbane. The pull of home was strong and they were worried about the impact of pollution on the health of their young children. The day she landed, Jessica began visiting small companies making products she thought would sell well to young buyers back in Beijing. “I kept knocking on doors saying, ‘Hello, skin care manufacturer, I am ­opening up a store on Alibaba’s TMall Global’. “They would say, ‘What? You mean Chinese ­people want to buy stuff from Australia?’”

The number of brands on Jessica’s Suitcase has steadily increased, and now includes everything from paw paw ointment to face creams, toy bears made of Australian sheepskin to Penfolds wine. Jessica’s search for goods led to Bubs, an infant ­formula business based on goat’s milk, set up by an Australian woman, Kristy Carr, who had lived in Hong Kong with young children.

Around 2015, on the suggestion of a major ­Chinese fund manager, Albert decided to go out on his own and set up a private equity fund ­investing in Australian products that Chinese ­people and ­others overseas would be interested in buying. “I decided to invest in Bubs as I thought it was a really good company with really good ­management. We helped to fix some of their issues with the China market and in January 2017 we were able to list the business.” Wattle Hill was formed, the name taken from the apartment building where they first lived in Brisbane. The Bubs investment was followed by the Capilano Honey takeover last year. The investments have one thing in common — the potential to take them to the China market.
Jessica Rudd and Albert Tse in Shanghai. Picture: Daniele Mattioli

Jessica says she doesn’t plan her life but she is confident her own newly merged business now has the critical mass to take off. On a five-month stint in Shanghai last year she decided to update herself on China’s changing retail market. “Neither of us has worked in retail or has branding ­experience but we know this place [China] and we can spot its trends,” she says.

Former NSW premier Nick Greiner, an adviser to Wattle Hill, met Albert when they were both incoming independent directors on the board of Jemena, an electricity, gas and pipeline utility company owned by State Grid and Singapore Power. He met Jessica later socially. “In many ways they are a 21st century renaissance couple who effortlessly bridge Australian and Chinese culture, society and business,” Greiner says. “They are able not just to network but also to do business with large and small counterparts in both countries.”

Jessica rejects suggestions it’s difficult for ­Australians to do business in China. “People in Australia get über-excited about taking a tiny piece of the US market, but they think China is just all too daunting. Isn’t Trump’s ­America more daunting than this place?” Nevertheless she says people need to be prepared for many twists and turns in the rapidly changing Chinese market — hence the couple’s decision to spend an extended time in Shanghai last year.

Jessica says the family may decide to move ­overseas again but they will always have a base in Australia. “That is the upbringing we were both lucky enough to have. It is idyllic, we are glad to be able to give it to our children, but we don’t feel like that means we are people of one place. We can be anywhere and we can still return.”

GLENDA KORPORAAL

ASSOCIATE EDITOR (BUSINESS)
Glenda Korporaal has been covering business and finance in Australia and around the world for more than thirty years. She has worked in Sydney, Canberra, Washington, New York, London, Hong Kong and Singapore an... Read more

Why does Dan Andrews need ACBRI and Jean Dong when he has the services of Commissioner for Victoria in China Tim Dillon ?


                                                        Meet the Commissioner for Victoria to China – Tim DillonIn this video, Tim explains                                                            some of what’s needed to build successful business relationships, and why he loves living                                                           and working in China.,

In defending the Victorian Government's work with the Australia-China Belt and Road Initiative Premier Dan Andrews has said:
“The agreement is about creating opportunities for Victorian businesses and creating more local jobs — and we’re proud to work with the Australia-China Belt and Road Initiative.”


Why the services of the ACBRI, founded and led by Jean Dong, were required is unclear, given that the Victorian Government  has had an office in Shanghai doing very much the same thing. In the Vic Government's own words: 
Appointed as the Commissioner for Victoria in China in September 2014, Tim Dillon is based in Shanghai and heads up the Victorian Government Trade and Investment (VGTI) network in China, helping Victorian businesses to connect with Chinese markets.
Tim brings significant experience to his position, having previously served as the Commissioner for Victoria in South East Asia (2009-2014) and as the Executive Director of the Tokyo office (2004-2009).