From Tony Pua's Facebook:
How come Joanna Yu and Cheah Tek Kuang of Ambank are still free men after Najib claimed Bank Negara has taken action against them for facilitating money laundering into Najib's personal bank account?
In fact, former Group MD of Ambank, Cheah is now the Chairman of Berjaya Sports Toto and Independent Director of IOI Group. Can meh?
It's in stark contrast with Singapore who have charged and jailed Bankers facilitating the 1MDB money laundering scandal.
Bank Negara's reticence is only enhancing our reputation as a top global Kleptocracy. Tahniah!
Come clean on 'action' against 1MDB-linked bankers, Putrajaya told
Not matching Singapore's level of transparency on probe will put country
to shame, says Tony Pua.
To be read with:
AMbank's Cheah Tek Kuang should not have been rewarded with the BToto chairmanship;should instead be formally interrogated.
AMbank's Cheah Tek Kuang should not have been rewarded with the BToto chairmanship;should instead be formally interrogated.
AND
END
Reference
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
Najib's SRC trial: AmBank manager R. Uma Devi is not the only source of evidence;other more important bits of evidence appear to have been ignored.
by Ganesh Sahathevan
Ambank manager Uma Devi (left), who testified at the trial of Najib Razak. There seems to be an unhealthy reliance on her testimony.
The Straits Times and others have reported today:
That would be no need to allegedly purport anything.
END
The Straits Times and others have reported today:
A sum of RM1.9 billion (S$626 million) was credited into one of Malaysia's former premier Najib Razak's private bank accounts between 2011 and 2013, the High Court heard on Monday (April 29).
Part of the money was purportedly a donation from one "Prince Faisal al Turki" and the Finance Ministry of Saudi Arabia.
This was confirmed by AmBank manager R. Uma Devi during cross-examination by Najib's counsel Harvinderjit Singh.
Meanwhile, this writer had, in 2015, analysed bank remittance documents placed in the public domain by WSJ which suggested that the remittance into Najib's account was not a donation. This writer and others had expected, in 2015, that a change of government would allow investigation of the details disclosed in the documents but that appears not to have been done.Had it been done, the prosecution would not have to rely solely on Ms Uma Devi's testimony about Najib's bank statements.That would be no need to allegedly purport anything.
END
No comments:
Post a Comment