Saturday, July 28, 2018

Lee Ming Tee & Mulpha's Australian AUD 2.9 Billion funding examined by an Australian Senate Inquiry

NOTE








treatment of residents in its retirement villages, few if any have  looked at Aveo's financial structure, funded in large part by retirees who provide interest free unsecured loans.The loans,which are essentially long term debt ,now total almost AUD 3 Billion.




Opening statement to Senate
Aged Care Inquiry


Posted by Michael West | Jul 17, 2018 |

Despatch, Government

Opening statement to the Senate Economics References Committee 
Inquiry into the Financial and tax practices of for-profit 
aged care providers
 by Michael West.
Thank you for the privilege of appearing before this committee today.
I have a brief statement to make.
There is a conflict of interest in corporations operating aged care facilities in Australia.
This is the conflict between maximising financial returns for shareholders and
maintaining decent levels of care for the elderly.
This may not be an insurmountable conflict but it should be subject to oversight.
The best, first, step in managing this conflict is transparency.
Senators will be aware of the terrific success of the 2015 Senate Inquiry into
Corporate Tax  Avoidance by this very Committee. The sunlight which was shone,
via that inquiry, into devious tax practices of large corporations, and the resulting reforms
and publication of Tax Transparency data, has helped deliver billions of extra dollars in
corporate tax receipts to the national coffers. Transparency, coupled with more determined
 enforcement, has led to improved tax behaviour.
I hope that this inquiry will produce a similarly successful outcome by focussing politica
l and regulatory attention on the aged care sector and bringing transparency reform.
As a journalist who, along with Jason Ward, has published recent investigations into the
retirement village and aged care sector, I can make some brief observations of some of the
challenges faced. My website, michaelwest.com.au, deals mostly in investigations into large
companies and the way they intersect with governments.
I analysed three of the largest corporate players in this country who operate retirement
villages and aged care assets: Lend Lease, Aveo and Stockland.
Links to the stories are included in this statement for the perusal of the Senators.
Between them, these three companies are sitting on $10 billion worth of resident loans.
These loans are unsecured, zero interest and of no specified duration. Lendlease records
“resident liabilities” of $4.6 billion, Stockland $2.5 billion in “retirement village resident
obligations” and Aveo $2.9 billion  in “resident loans”.
They are both the property developers, the agents, and the managers too, who typically
 charge 30 per cent in deferred management fees. It is doubtful that elderly residents know
they are giving an unsecured, zero interest loan to a property developer in return for some
 sort of right.
For the purposes of this inquiry, it should be noted that these are retirement village operations
 we are talking about here. Both Aveo and Lendlease – not Stockland – are in aged care too.
And the lines indeed blur between retirement villages, “transition” services and nursing
homes. The latter are often attached to the former.
In any case, I have not analysed aged care bonds but what would happen in the event of a wind-up of a major eldercare operation? Staff would be paid first, as is the case with insolvencies, then inevitably the liquidator would take his or her hungry pound of flesh, followed by secured creditors – read the banks.
What rarely happens in the event of insolvency is unsecured creditors seeing a brass razoo.
Typically, the Australian Taxation Office is one such unsecured creditor.
That means the financial carnage, were it to occur, would fall squarely on the head of the
taxpayer as government would be unlikely to countenance a large collapse in such as
sensitive sector.
Are taxpayers protected? Is anybody watching?
Talking with industry insiders for these investigations it became apparent that the
For-Profit players can use this interest-free money anyway they like.
Do they pay tax? Stockland uses a trust structure so it is incumbent on members to stump up
the tax. Lend Lease – according to the ATO transparency data – paid zero tax in Australia on
$24 billion of income over three years.
Worse, it has been buying villages, claiming a bonanza in deductions by changing the
contracts from lease to loan arrangements, booking the benefit of those deductions to its
 bottom line, and ignoring the tax law that says you can’t double dip. It is understood the
Tax Office is investigating.
Aveo is adept at eliminating its taxable income too, and therefore its tax bill. Over the three
years of available Tax Office transparency data, the group recorded $1.4 billion in total
 income and showed zero tax payable.
Both Lend Lease and Aveo are expanding rapidly in aged care. They enjoy large subsidies
from government but pay little or no tax themselves.
Bear in mind we are talking only about the leading corporate players in the eldercare sector.
What of the smaller players whose financial statements cannot be found?
There are risks with these big players. Lend Lease is one of Australia’s leading blue chip
companies but our investigations found earnings inflated by aggressive asset revaluations
and reclassifications. We also found leverage buried in joint ventures, loans from one joint
venture used to fund a buy-back of Lend Lease shares.
For its part, Aveo appears to be higher risk. Tax haven associates, a circuitous array 
of corporate entities globally and a host of related party transactions make this a very
 tough enterprise to examine.
Does the Department understand the risks? Do the regulators understand the risks?
In reporting on more than two decades of share market booms and crashes I can say that the
warning signs for corporate crashes were often in aggressive pursuit of profits, aggressive
 secrecy and aggressive – that is labyrinthine – corporate structures. The use of tax havens,
trusts, off-balance sheet debts in joint ventures, leverage which cannot easily be detected;
these are the things which are only ever fully understood when it is too late.
As the numbers in aged care are exploding, this sector faces many challenges.
Instances of abuse of residents, gross failure of care and the gouging of residents have
 been well publicised.
I submit that it would be worthwhile for authorities to pay close attention to the corporate
providers, particularly private equity operators who tend to be more aggressive on cost-cutting and leverage.
Above all, transparency is critical. A few suggestions:
1. Aged care providers with revenue of $20 million or more should file general purpose financial statements (GP) with the relevant state and Commonwealth departments.
2. All tax haven connections should be separately disclosed, as should the full amount of
government subsidies, and a record of all breaches of relevant professional standards.
Residents and their families should not be expected to trawl through the ASIC database to
find the relevant corporate vehicle. This is even beyond the capacity of most journalists.
Moreover, ASIC fees are prohibitive at $38 for a single set of financials which may not
 even be for the relevant entity.
The statutory materials should be published on the website of each operator along with the
glossy marketing material.
3. Examine the security of resident loans, leases and bonds, and consider whether this
needs to be tightened to protect the elderly and their families. In the event of a wind up,
will there be anything left over?
4. Contracts need to be simplified.
END

Khazanah directors threat of resignation may have exposed entire board to liability for billions lost as a result of their "undated letter" misadventure.


by Ganesh Sahathevan


The eight other members of Khazanah Nasional who resigned
 (clockwise from top left): Tan Sri Md Nor Md Yusof, Tan Sri Mohamed
 Azman Yahya, Dato' Mohammed Azlan Hashim, 
Raja Tan Sri Dato' Seri Arshad Bin Raja Tun Uda, Yeo Kar Peng, 
Dato’ Dr Nirmala Menon, Dato' Sri Nazir Tun Abdul Razak, and 
Tan Sri Andrew Sheng Len Tao



In a typically Malaysian move the chairman and directors of the  Malaysian sovereign wealth fund Khazanah have chosen to threaten to resign, sending Prime Minister Tun Mahathir undated resignation letters so that he can decide if they should resign.

The problem for the chairman and the board is this:it matters little what the PM does with their undated letters, their duty remains to the company and its shareholder.

Directors can of course resign at any time, and they do so by submitting written,dated ,signed letters of resignation to the company secretary. This "let the PM decide" maneuver does little more than convey to the shareholder that the board has gone on strike. While this may work for  coolies, it does not work for company directors.Directors who refuse to work are in breach of their duties as directors, and may be liable for the fall in share prices at Tenaga, Telekom and other Khazanah companies listed on the Bursa Malaysia,caused by their threat of resignation. Billions lost, all of which may be attributed to the board.

Khazanah Nasional managing director Azman Mokhtar (above) and eight other members of the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund's board have submitted their resignations to the government.

Khazanah Nasional managing director Azman Mokhtar (above) and eight other members of the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund's board have submitted their resignations to the government.PHOTO: THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK

END 

Khazanah directors threat of resignation may have exposed entire board to liability for billions lost as a result of their "undated letter" misadventure.



by Ganesh Sahathevan



In a typically Malaysian move the chairman and directors of board Malaysian sovereign wealth 
fund Khazanah have chosen to threaten to resign, sending Prime Minister Tun Mahathir undated 
resignation letters so that he can decide if they should resign.


The problem for the chairman and the board is this:it matters little what the PM does with
their undated letters, their duty remains to the company and its shareholder.


Directors can of course resign at any time, and they do so by submitting written,dated ,signed letters of
resignation to the company secretary, This "let the PM decide" maneuver does little more than convey to  
the shareholder that the board has gone on strike. While this may work for  be coolies, it does not work for
company directors.Directors who refuse to work are in breach of their duties as directors, and may liable 
for the fall in share prices at Tenaga, Telekom and other Khazanah companies listed on the Bursa Malaysia,
caused by their threat of resignation.




The eight other members of Khazanah Nasional who resigned
 (clockwise from top left): Tan Sri Md Nor Md Yusof, Tan Sri Mohamed
 Azman Yahya, Dato' Mohammed Azlan Hashim, 
Raja Tan Sri Dato' Seri Arshad Bin Raja Tun Uda, Yeo Kar Peng, 
Dato’ Dr Nirmala Menon, Dato' Sri Nazir Tun Abdul Razak, and 
Tan Sri Andrew Sheng Len Tao


Khazanah Nasional managing director Azman Mokhtar (above) and eight other members of the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund's board have submitted their resignations to the government.

Khazanah Nasional managing director Azman Mokhtar (above) and eight other members of the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund's board have submitted their resignations to the government.PHOTO: THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK

Saturday, July 21, 2018

NZ's Winston Peters ends China honeymoon over security concerns:Will he put right the Shewan Inquiry's 1MDB-China money laundering issues?

by Ganesh Sahathevan

First see :

Was the Shewan Inquiry compromised by John Shewan's China Construction Bank links-1MDB New Zealand links overlooked in deference to the PRC?



AND NOW,MAYBE HOPE OF SOME ACTION:

New Zealand ends China honeymoon over security concerns

New defense policy no longer calls Beijing an 'important strategic partner'
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi, right, meets New Zealand's Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters in Beijing on May 25.    © Reuters
WELLINGTON -- New Zealand's balancing of its relationships with China, its most important trading partner, and with traditional allies Australia and the U.S. has shifted toward the latter two, after the announcement of major new defense spending and a strategic report using uncharacteristically critical language about China.
The commentary on China in the Ministry of Defense's Strategic Policy Statement released July 6 is relatively mild and also includes positive references to the country's international role in the Asia-Pacific region. But it marks a departure from Wellington's previous stance of carefully avoiding causing any offense and no longer refers to Beijing as an "important strategic partner."
The more forthright tone from New Zealand can be partly attributed to increased pressure from Australia and the U.S., analysts said.
On July 9 Defense Minister Ron Mark announced that New Zealand would buy four Boeing P-8A Poseidon submarine-hunting maritime patrol aircraft for 2.35 billion NZ dollars ($1.6 billion). One of the key reasons Mark gave for the purchase was the aircraft's ability to operate in joint missions with allies such as Australia, the U.S. and Canada.
Acting Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has been signaling this year that New Zealand must respond to a rapidly changing regional security landscape.
"The Asia-Pacific region is much more contested. Great power rivalries have intensified ... Overall, there is less of a consensus on what the future of this region will look like and greater concern about the strain on the international rules-based order," he said in a recent speech.
The defense policy statement said China is deeply integrated into the rules-based global order but has not consistently adopted the governance and values of the order's traditional leaders. It noted Beijing had "adopted a liberalising economy absent liberal democracy."
New Zealand's Acting Prime Minister Winston Peters, center, and Defense Minister Ron Mark, left, announcing that the country has agreed to buy four Boeing maritime patrol planes from the U.S.   © AP
China's more confident assertion of its interests has raised tensions with neighboring countries and the U.S., and some of its actions challenge the existing world order.
"China has expanded its military and coastguard presence in disputed areas of maritime Asia. It has determined not to engage with an international tribunal ruling on the status of sovereignty claims," the statement said.
"Both domestically and as a basis for international engagement, China holds views on human rights and freedom of information that stand in contrast to those that prevail in New Zealand."
Peters confirmed Beijing had protested about the commentary through diplomatic channels. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a Beijing press conference on Monday her government had made "stern representations with New Zealand on the wrong remarks it has made on China."
"We urge New Zealand to view the relevant issue in an objective way, correct its wrong words and deeds and contribute more to the mutual trust and cooperation between our two countries," she said in reference to comments on the Chinese militarization of contested islands in the South China Sea.
Peters defended the change in tone in the statement, telling reporters this week that New Zealand was now willing to be more candid and honest, "rather than pulling all our punches and doing nothing about things we don't agree with."
The statement comes just six weeks after Peters visited China and announced a new round of negotiations to upgrade the two countries' free trade agreement. Since The FTA was signed in 2008, China has overtaken Australia as New Zealand's largest trading partner and annual exports to China have increased sixfold to NZ$12.2 billion.
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm TurnbullAustralian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government has introduced sweeping new laws aimed at preventing interference by foreign governments.    © AP
David Capie, the director of the Centre for Strategic Studies at Wellington's Victoria University, said there was a growing perception in Washington and Canberra -- rightly or wrongly -- that New Zealand was unwilling to confront growing Chinese political influence within the country.
"To address this, the defence policy statement is a clear tilt back towards traditional partners, notwithstanding some gentle criticism of Washington's decisions about TPP and the Paris Climate Change agreement," Capie said in a commentary.
The debate over political influence within New Zealand intensified last year with revelations that Jian Yang, a legislator in New Zealand's then-ruling center-right National Party, had taught English to Chinese spies before leaving China in the 1990s and becoming a New Zealand citizen in 2004. Yang denied having spied for China and remains in Parliament.
A report last year by Canterbury University political scientist Anne-Marie Brady also claimed Beijing had taken control of nearly all New Zealand's Chinese language media and was influencing the expatriate Chinese community in New Zealand through front organizations.
Similar allegations about Chinese interference in Australian politics led this month to the passage of sweeping new laws by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government aimed at preventing interference by foreign governments.
The growth in the economic relationship between New Zealand and China has also created domestic political tensions. Chinese buyers were partly blamed for the boom in Auckland housing prices, especially between 2014 and 2016, which has made housing unaffordable for many first-time buyers.
Chinese companies buying farm land and agricultural companies in recent years also became controversial, although China still accounts for only a relatively small proportion of total foreign investment in New Zealand.
The Labour Party-led coalition government, which came into power in October last year, has responded by announcing a proposed ban on housing purchases by non-resident foreigners and has also made rules for foreign investment in rural land more restrictive.
China's growing influence in the South Pacific, a region where New Zealand and Australia traditionally were the leading powers and aid donors, has come under renewed scrutiny. Without naming China, Peters has referred to growing competition and influence by non-traditional partners in the region, where Chinese-funded roads, buildings and other aid projects are an increasingly common sight.
New Zealand announced a large increase in aid to the South Pacific this year and with Australia is reportedly planning to sign a new security, aid and cooperation pact with South Pacific countries later this year.
Peters said China and New Zealand remain close but the government would in future be "upfront and speak plainly to our friends."

Anwar Ibrahim & the IIIT: The Children Also Rise........

by Ganesh Sahathevan


Anwar Ibrahim's children continue faithfully his IIIT work.From Washington to Florida (recall Sami Al-Arian et al). Daughter Nurul Izzah condemns RadioHead, while  som  Mod Ihsan does his thing out of New York.




END

Reference

JOHNS HOPKINS' SCHOOL OF ADVANCED TERROR
by Ilan Weinglass
   
Johns Hopkins University is demonstrating a disturbing pattern of awarding fellowships to Islamists with an avowedly anti-Western agenda. Mustafa El Khalfi, the Moroccan Islamist who was recently awarded a fellowship[1] at the university's School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), is not the first. In March of 2005, SAIS granted a visiting fellowship to Anwar Ibrahim, a terror-supporting Malaysian Islamist whose Virginia-based organization apparently committed tax fraud in his benefit.
On March 30, 2005, SAIS announced[2] that Ibrahim, the former deputy prime minister of Malaysia, was joining the university's Foreign Policy Institute, as a visiting scholar. Ibrahim was to "present seminars[3] on contemporary Southeast Asian politics, economic reform, Islam and democracy... [and] join in SAIS activities." The announcement by SAIS said that Ibrahim would also be working on "a project examining democratization in the Muslim world." While SAIS described him "as a strong advocate for civil society, economic liberalization, moderate Islam and democratic governance," publicly available evidence shows the opposite. A quick glance at his website[4] reveals a prominently featured photo of Ibrahim together with Yusuf Qaradawi, a leading Islamist scholar who is associated[5] with the Muslim Brotherhood and supports HAMAS, and who recently issued a fatwa calling for the Islamic conquest of Europe.[6]
Anwar Ibrahim is a founder[7] and director of the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT),[8] a think tank in Virginia that has alleged links to terrorism. IIIT's 2003 tax-exempt IRS filing[9] lists a $720 donation to the al-Haramain Islamic Foundation of Ashland, Oregon, which was designated[10] as a terrorist funding organization by the U.S. government in 2004. Among the Treasury Department's findings were that the Oregon branch of al-Haramain engaged in tax fraud, money laundering, supporting Chechen mujahideen affiliated with al Qaeda, and had "direct links between the U.S. branch and Usama bin Laden." In fact, many of al-Haramain's offices around the world were closed for supporting terrorism.
There is more evidence of IIIT's links to terrorism. A few examples: according to court documents[11], in the early 1990s IIIT donated at least $50,000 to a think tank run by Sami al-Arian, the World Islamic and Study Enterprise (WISE), that served as a front group for Palestinian Islamic Jihad. IIIT is also named as a defendant in two class-action lawsuits brought by victims of the 9/11 attacks. One alleges[12] that IIIT received the bulk of its operating expenses from the SAAR network,[13] whose component groups are accused in another class-action suit[14] of being "fronts for the sponsor of al Qaeda and international terror." The same suit lists IIIT as well as every officer of IIIT besides Anwar Ibrahim as a supporter of the SAAR network. This public information was available to SAIS, yet the school extended a fellowship to Ibrahim.
Ibrahim, along with three other IIIT directors, is also a trustee[15] of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). According to congressional testimony[16] of testimony of Jonathan Winer, former Deputy Secretary of State for International Law Enforcement, in October 2002 WAMY made Hamas leader Khalid Mishal an "honored guest" at a conference held in Riyadh. A Saudi opposition group reports[17] that WAMY disseminates literature encouraging "religious hatred and violence against Jews, Christians, Shi'a and Ashaari Muslims." Evidently, as a trustee of this group, Anwar Ibrahim is far from advocating moderate Islam.
Ibrahim and his family were also the beneficiaries of an apparent tax fraud perpetrated by IIIT. The same tax filings showing a donation to the al-Haramian foundation show $92,200 in contributions to Ibrahim's daughter, Nurul Izzah. IIIT violated U.S. law when it wrote "none" under "Donee's relationship" when listing donations to Ibrahim's daughter. The group would have lost its tax-exempt status had it been known that it was sending money to the family member of a director. Ibrahim never disavowed this act when given the chance and even stated explicitly[18] that these contributions were made for the education of his six children.
Moreover, the International Free Anwar Campaign (IFAC), which was established when Ibrahim was in a Malaysian prison, has some apparent links to al Qaeda. Rahim Ghouse,[19] who was an IFAC leader based out of Melbourne, Australia, had business dealings with Yassin al-Qadi, who is on the Treasury Department's list of Specially Designated Terrorists for funding al Qaeda. While this alone is not conclusive, it should have raised a red flag. Instead, SAIS assigned Ibrahim to "counsel students[20] who wish to learn more about Southeast Asia and the Muslim world."
Perhaps most importantly, Ibrahim never disavowed IIIT's support of terrorism. On the contrary: in an October 25, 2003 response[21] to the broadcasting of terror-supporting charges against IIIT on Australian television, he effusively praised the organization and said that charges against it were politically motivated.
SAIS also recently announced a fellowship, funded by W.W. Norton & Company, for students with the "firm intention to pursue a career that promotes international understanding between the United States and other countries and works toward the goal of preventing terrorism." In light of fellowships granted to Mustafa El Khalfi and Anwar Ibrahim, it seems that SAIS, is doing the exact opposite.
SAIS, however, recently lost Ibrahim to the newly renamed Prince Alwaleed bin Talal[22] Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, at Georgetown University, where he lectures "on several topics."[23] It is ironic that this trustee of WAMY, which supports HAMAS and has been implicated[24] in funding al Qaeda and other Islamist organizations, has been assigned to teach Georgetown students "modernity in Islam, [and] interfaith understanding."
Footnotes
1.  Olivier Guitta, "Johns Hopkins U's Islamist Fellowship," Front Page Magazine, December 21, 2005,
(www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=20599).
2. Felisa Neuringer Klubes, "Former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia Anwar Ibrahim Joins JHU SAIS as Visiting Scholar," March 30, 2005,
(www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/media_events/ Media_Advisories/MA2005/Ibrahim05.html).
3.  See [2.]
4.  http://www.anwaribrahim.com/ver2nd/enter.html
5.  "Hostage: how the Muslim world battled for the life of Norman Kember," The Guardian, December 11, 2005,
(www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1664682,00.html).
6.  Joel Leyden, "How Al-Qaeda Justifies Terrorism and Genocide," December 26, 2005,
(www.israelnewsagency.com/al-quaedaterrorismus10012.htm).
7.  Fareed Zakaria, "Anwar Ibrahim,"
(http://foreignexchange.tv/?q=node/736)
8.  "In Search Of Friends Among The Foes," Washington Post
(www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12823-2004Sep10_3.html).
9.  Guide Star Database of Non-Profit organizations,
(www.guidestar.org/pqShowGsReport.do?npoId=921171).
10.  Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Treasury, "U.S.-Based Branch of Al Haramain Foundation Linked to Terror Treasury Designates U.S. Branch, Director," JS-1895, September 9, 2004,
(www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/js1895.htm).
11.  Dep't of Justice website,
(www.usdoj.gov/usao/vae/ArchivePress/OctoberPDFArchive/03/ safaaffid102003.pdf).
12.  Find Law,
(http://news.corporate.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/ ashtonalq90302cmp.pdf).
13.  Douglas Farah and John Mintz, "U.S. Trails Va. Muslim Money, Ties," Washington Post, October 7, 2002,
(http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=inthenews502& Category=inthenews&Subcategory=0).
14.  Find Law, (http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/burnettba112202acmp.pdf).
15.  Dep't of Justice website,
(www.usdoj.gov/usao/vae/ArchivePress/%20SeptemberPDFArchive/ 03/biheirisupp091203.pdf).
16.  Find Law,
(http://www.mipt.org/pdf/s-hrg108-245.pdf).
17.  Ciaonet Org,
(www.ciaonet.org/pbei/winep/policy_2002/2002_673.html).
18.  "Response Of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim To The Attempt To Connect Him To The 'Al-Qaeda Terrorists," October 25, 2003,
(www.freeanwar.net/July2003/press_release261003.htm).
19. "Probe into Anwar terror claims," Sidney Morning Herald, October 25, 2003,
(www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/25/1066974373724.html).
20.  Felisa Neuringer Klubes, "Former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia Anwar Ibrahim Joins JHU SAIS As Visiting Scholar," SAIS, John Hopkins University,
(www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/media_events/Media_Advisories/ MA2005/Ibrahim05.html).
21.  "Response Of Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim To The Attempt To Connect Him To The 'Al-Qaeda Terrorists," October 25, 2003,
(www.freeanwar.net/July2003/press_release261003.htm).
22.  Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, "Faculty,"
(http://explore.georgetown.edu/people/ai55/?PageTemplateID=75).
23.  Nora Boustany, "An Unlikely but Eager Voice Between Islam and the West," Washington Post, September 2, 2005,
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/ 2005/09/01/AR2005090102308.html.
24.  Ciao Org,
(http://www.ciaonet.org/pbei/winep/policy_2002/2002_673.html).

Ilan Weinglass is a fellow at the American Center for Democracy and a business intelligence analyst in the private sector. He graduated from SAIS in 2005.
This article appeared in Front Page Magazine (www.FrontPageMagazine.com), January 12, 2006.

Friday, July 20, 2018

Johor has a water shortage;Singapore wants a water deal with Johor : Mahathir should bless the "win-win"solution

by Ganesh Sahathevan









A dry Congok Dam in Mersing. Rainwater, which the dam relies on to replenish its reserves, is scarce thanks to the El Nino phenomenon. Pic by Mohd Azren Jamaludin



First, the brainwave  which seems to have been inspired 
by Singapore:



The crown prince of Johor, Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim, has said that water in the state belongs to the state government, and he prefers that the federal government not interfere on the issue, as it relates to the existing agreement with Singapore. 
Speaking in an exclusive interview with Channel NewsAsia on Thursday (Jul 19), he stressed that water is an issue over which the state has sovereignty, and that the Johor state government should decide on a “win-win” agreement with Singapore.
“At the end of the day, the water in Johor belongs to Johor. Water is state sovereignty. When it comes to religion, land and water, it belongs to the state. Therefore, I think it's the Johor state government (that) should decide. (I prefer) not to have federal interference when it comes to water between Johor and Singapore,” said Tunku Ismail.

Meanwhile, the reality is that Johor is running out of raw water that it can supply Singapore without harming its own supplies:



A GHASTLY sight greets those who are given permission to enter the Congok Dam in Mersing, Johor. Resembling anything but a dam, all one sees is cracked, parched earth dotted with pools of water barely there.
The water level at the dam was at 2.5m and 2.6m this past week — dangerously below the critical level of 3.5m, thanks to the drought caused by the El Nino phenomenon, which has hit Mersing for the past two years.
The drought affected the output at the Tenglu water treatment plant, which relies on raw water sourced from the Congok Dam. The dam relies solely on rainwater to replenish its reserves.
As a result, 40,000 people in Mersing are putting up with a fifth month of water rationing.
This comes in the wake of a four-month water rationing exercise that caused hardship to 600,000 people in Pasir Gudang, Masai and part of Johor Baru last year.
Another 66,000 people in Tanjung Surat, Pantai Timur and parts of Kota Tinggi had also experienced water rationing around the same time due to the low water levels recorded at two dams in the state.
In Mersing, traders, businesses and households are the most affected by the latest round of rationing, as their taps run dry for two days before supply is resumed for a 24-hour period.
Unfortunately, the “back on” supply in certain areas in Mersing was reduced to six hours recently, compounding the people’s hardship.
The situation is as grave as it gets. In an exclusive interview with the New Straits Times last Tuesday, Sultan of Johor Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar said the recorded rainfall this year was half of last year’s.
The ruler urged industries to use recycled water, and for state authorities to look into adopting Singapore’s water management model.
The city-state is known for its sustainable water management, including its NEWater (treated used water).
With Johor’s water reserves being susceptible to weather patterns, and because 99 per cent of the state’s raw water are sourced from surface water, new sources are needed to cope with the lower rainfall.
The Johor Water Regulatory Body (Bakaj), which is responsible for managing the state’s water resources, said it had been working to protect water catchment areas.
Bakaj director Mohd Riduan Md Ali said it spared no effort to ensure water reservoirs and their catchment areas were protected.
He said Bakaj, along with the state government and other water-linked agencies, such as the state water utility SAJ Holdings Sdn Bhd, were in talks to find new water sources, including a proposal by the state government to tap underground water via tube wells.
“The state government will make the announcement on the likely location for the tube wells,” Riduan told the New Sunday Times.
He said Bakaj had been proactive in acting against those who disrupted Johor’s water supply system, including through agriculture or industrial activities that encroached into water catchment areas.
Under the Johor Water Enactment 1921, those found guilty of causing blockage or interference to the water supply system related to any dam can be fined up to RM500,000.
Riduan said anyone who wished to set up farms or industries near water catchment areas needed to get a licence from Bakaj.
He said Bakaj had fenced water catchment areas to prevent encroachment since last year.
“We began with the Upper Layang Dam in Masai where we partially fenced the 2,575ha water catchment area. The second phase involving 13km of fencing in the same area will begin by end of the year.”
He said fencing would first be done around critical dams in the state before it was expanded to other catchment areas.
“We have partially fenced the Sungai Pulai water catchment area and this has prevented encroachment.”
Riduan said Bakaj was moving to gazette all water catchment areas under its jurisdiction to further protect them.
“There were cases where the boundary of agriculture land breached the boundary of the water catchment areas.
“With the fencing and the creation of buffer zones between agricultural land and catchment areas, as well as regular checks, we have controlled the situation.”




SEE ALSO 
Taps in 1.8 million south Johor households run dry

Mahathir should bless this union ,between a state bound by national boundaries,and a city state which has no choice but to remind Malaysia that the water agreement is at the basis for Singapore's very existence as an independent sovereign state."

END